|
The
limits to growth
By Aftab Ahmad
Khan
The debate on the limits to growth in the last
three decades has been an eye opener and it has been accompanied by
considerable refinement and sophistication of the notion of limits. When
Malthus enunciated his ideas about human population eventually
outstripping available food supply, he was essentially talking about
limits. Since then several efforts have been made to estimate the major
resources essential to the survival of human kind and the period for which
they are likely to be available. Most of these forecasts went wrong
because they were based on the technological constants of their time and
did not take into account human ingenuity and possible scientific
advances. The question remains relevant, however, and human kind must take
care not to cross the bounds. It should continuously look for substitutes
so that life sustenance system of the planet does not break down.
The limits to growth have been discussed mostly in the
context of the earth’s capacity to sustain an optimum population given
the quantum of food that can be produced and the natural resources
available for energy needs and industrial utilisation. The problem
essentially concerns the capacity to sustain and to yield, the two of
which are linked. The earth’s resources are finite, and therefore there
is a logical limit to the number of people it can support and to the
length of time for which this support can extend. However, man has the
capacity to manage the environment, to conserve it, to improve it, and to
innovate within it, provided he is given a propitious setting, the right
motivation and an efficient organisation with a positive operating
culture. The environmentalists’ warning that pollution levels in air,
water and ground are rapidly rising to dangerous levels is correct, but it
is within man’s capability to ensure that they do not become a hazard to
survival. Such a programme would require massive inputs and continuous
monitoring, but it would still be manageable. A beginning has already been
made and the results attained so far give every reason to hope that
science and technology will be able to tackle the problems. Life styles,
land use and industries can all be slowly modified to ensure that the
environmental damage from them is minimal. New technologies can embody
adequate safeguards.
The limits to food production as forecast – that it
can go only so far and no further – again assume a technological and
scientific constant. That these barriers can be crossed has been
demonstrated adequately by the success of the Green Revolution. The new
hybrid dwarf varieties of cereals are not only high yielding; they also
resist diseases, pests and some other vagaries of nature. With the right
mix of these improved varieties of seeds, fertilisers, pesticides and
irrigation, surprisingly higher levels of production can be attained. This
technology has already been put to use but its full potential still
remains to be achieved in many countries of the developing world. Cloning
may give some wonderful results in agriculture generally and in vegetable
growing and horticulture particularly, in the years to come. The
possibility of growing rich crops under water has already been
demonstrated, although much work needs to be done before this can become
economically viable. Here again, the constraints can be overcome.
Energy is another resource which is finite if only
conventional sources are considered. Fossil fuels, in terms of their known
reserves are not infinite, but fresh explorations are constantly
identifying new sources. Cost efficient ways of utilising them are being
found. If one is willing to pay the higher unit cost, the dangers of
resource exhaustion are not immediate. The search is on for cleaner and
less expensive substitutes. Solar energy is already beyond the stage of
experimental use, and nuclear energy has been in use for several years.
Both remain relatively expensive, but there are good prospects of their
cost being reduced. Biomass has a tremendous potential. Wind and the tides
might also become rich sources of energy. The future so far as energy
availability is concerned is certainly not one without hope, because it
will not be subject to the day’s technological constraints.
These projections should not, however lull us into a
sense of false security. The present situation in grim and only Herculean
effort can turn it into a positive and promising one. In many Third World
countries the population has to be stabilised, food production increased,
and cost efficient energy utilisation ensured. The key items in any agenda
for the future, therefore, would be the conservation and efficient
utilisation of resources, the preservation and enrichment of environmental
quality and the replacement of conventional sources of energy by new
sources that are economical and environmentally clean. The developed
countries have to give as much attention to these problems as the
developing ones. This is only one world and one environment. Since all
depend on it, all must share in looking after it.
In the context of growth limits, it may be pertinent
to point out that for most Third World countries; the high consumption
style of the affluent industrialised countries is unattainable, at least
in the foreseeable future. It is a mirage that these countries should not
run about endlessly chasing. That would only result in frustration. What
is needed is a non-emulative path of development which draws heavily on
indigenous creativity and also partakes of those growth points of modern
science and technology which can be viewed as the common heritage of man.
Such a path would gradually do away with the tendency to depend on
borrowed resources and would make the best possible use of local resources
and indigenous capability. Of course local resources and capability would
be continuously upgraded and enriched. In many sectors the technology to
the adopted, adapted and innovated would be labour intensive, low in
energy consumption and environmentally clean. Of necessity, the
alternative design for living would be low in personal consumption and
rich in social services.
In the final analysis, in the case of developing
countries, there is an urgent need to attend to the inner limits of growth
set by social structure, cultural norms, value attitude system, individual
and collective motivations, work ethics and organisational efficiency.
These involve such diverse cultural specificities that each society has to
seek its own solution.
|