| Jang Online | Daily Jang | The News | Site Map |



Year 2009, another year has passed by with a slight improvement in certain key macroeconomic indicators as compared to 2008. It is for sure that our economy will have to face quite a lot of challenges in the year 2010.

Economic highlights and analysis of 2009:  The IMF (International Monetary Fund) approved a 23-month loan of $7.6 billion in 2008 to help Pakistan to cope with the global financial crisis and balance of payment crisis. Up till now, Pakistan has received $6.5 billion from the IMF. IMF support has had a positive effect on certain areas, for e.g. macroeconomic imbalances have been shrinking, inflation has declined and the exchange rate has become more flexible as foreign currency reserves have increased, but there have been some negative consequences as well.

The government was required to adopt tight fiscal and monetary policies. Interest rates were kept high contrary to global trends, taxes were increased and subsidies were reduced that resulted in a very low GDP growth and rise in poverty. Moreover, foreign debt liabilities also increased and those were also short term, implying continued pressure on BOP (Balance of Payment) and fiscal deficit.

On 17th April 2009, the Friends of Pakistan (FoP) pledged more than $5 billion to stabilize PakistanŐs economy and fight terrorism The US and Japan pledged $1 billion each. Saudi Arabia added $700 million and the EU $640 million. Only a fraction of this amount was disbursed. In August of 2009, a FoDP forum was carried out in Turkey; however Pakistan failed to secure swift aid from donors.

Another development on the economic front was the approval of Kerry Lugar bill that got signed by US President Barrack Obama on 15th October, 2009 and on 21 Oct 2009 the federal cabinet formally accepted the Kerry Lugar law. One of the major objectives of this bill is to triple non-military aid to Pakistan to Rs.7.5 billion. Some of the economists were against this bill due to the fact that Pakistan is losing its self sufficiency and getting more dependent on foreign aid. But, the problem lies in our weak security situation which is demanding more budgetary expenditure that can only be made possible through the materialization of foreign funding. (see table-1)

Inflation was brought down with the help of tight monetary and fiscal policies but the challenge is to keep the downward trend going while stimulating growth.

Looking at the downward CPI inflation trend, the SBP (State Bank of Pakistan) cut the rate by one percentage point in April from 15 to 14 per cent. On August 16th, SBP cut the interest rate by 1 per cent to 13 per cent effective from August 17th. In November 2009, the SBP again cut the interest rates by 50 bps. It is evident that SBP is giving top priority to reducing inflation at the cost of growth. In this respect, the performance has been impressive with inflation reduced by one half in a span of few months. It seems that growth stimulation has been left to fiscal relaxation and foreign aid, although there has been a little easing of monetary policy as well. (see table-2)

Because of tight monetary and fiscal policy as directed by the IMF, demand was kept in control that resulted in reduced imports and better balance of trade. Higher remittances and reduced oil prices also helped.

Foreign investors had been cautious in bringing additional capital throughout the year. The reasons behind the decrease in foreign direct investment include, deteriorating law and order situation, power shortages and lack of policy implementation.

SBP expects a gradual recovery during FY10, and expects real GDP growth to be close to the target of 3.3 per cent in 2010. Signs of economic recovery include, (a) a rise in imports during July 2009, which points towards a possible pick up in domestic demand, (b) easing of LSM contraction and (c) resolution of circular debt problem would also support production activities in oil and energy sectors. The anticipated recovery may also be supported by the re-stocking of inventories and a small recovery in exports as the incipient recovery in major economies gather pace. However, the risks related to higher commodity prices and delays in anticipated external flows remain intact. SBP anticipates fiscal slippages led by a surge in expenditures due to security related operations and below par tax revenue collection. The central bank expects a current account deficit and a fiscal deficit at around 5.2 per cent, a level we have seen in FY09. However, its inflation outlook for FY10 stands at 10-12 per cent relative to 20.8 per cent reported in FY09.

Besides all these economic facts and figures, the real questions which arise are whether we, as a nation have moved ahead or not? Was 2009 really a useful year for our economy and what can we expect from 2010? Finally, the most essential query to ponder upon is if the poor, that is perhaps the most dominant segment of our society can expect something concrete and beneficial for themselves in the new year or not? These questions will only be answered in the days to come.

TABLE-1: MONTHLY CPI

INFLATION COMPARISON

Months          2009          2008

January          -0.4          1.91

February          1.0          0.49

March  1.4          3.08

April    1.4          3.04

May    0.2          2.69

June    1.0          2.10

July     1.5          3.34

August 1.7          2.14

September          0.5          0.97

October          1.0          2.12

November          1.4          -0.12

 

TABLE-2: BALANCE OF PAYMENT FOR 2009

(Million $)

          1Q-09          1Q-08          2Q-09          2Q-08          3Q-09          3Q-08          Oct/Nov,       Oct/ Nov,

                                                                   2009          2008

Trade Account          -2045          -4602          -2365          -4184          -2809          -4484          -1889          -252

Current Account          -550          -3636          -875          -4181          -532          -4258          827          ---

Exports          4231          5163          4800          5961          4620          5713          3057          2941

Imports          6276          9765          7165          10145          7429          10197          4945          5476

Remittances          2018          1662          2153          1723          2331          1879          1501.08          1086.65

FDI     497          1499.4          678.2          2104          471.7          1116.4          302.4          504.4


|Back Issues: The News - Daily Jang | Community | Greetings | Tariff | Advertising | Contact Us | Comments |