|
Federal Budget
2008-09
Some
uncertainty prevails: changes being proposed
in the size of various allocations
Qamar wanted the National Economic Council to cut the size of the
Public Sector Development Programme for 2008-09 from the amount of Rs 541
billion proposed by
the Planning Commission, but the NEC rejected the finance minister’s
demand
By Kaleem Omar
If proof were needed of the clout wielded by
the Planning Commission’s new deputy chairman, Salman Faruqui, in the
PPP-led coalition government, it was seen at a meeting of the National
Economic Council chaired by Prime Minister Yousuf Reza Gilani in Islamabad
on June 2 when the NEC rejected a demand by Finance Minister Naveed Qamar
to cut the size of the Public Sector Development Programme (PSDP) from the
amount of Rs 541 billion proposed by the Planning Commission.
Qamar’s demand was also supported by Foreign
Minister Shah Mehmood Qureishi. Both ministers reportedly expressed their
reservations on the proposed size of the PSDP, the biggest ever, and asked
the NEC to reduce the amount in view of the tight fiscal position of the
government.
But the four provincial finance and planning ministers
strongly opposed any cut in the Rs 541 billion PSDP, which includes an
amount of Rs 170 billion for the annual development programme of the
provinces and Rs 371 billion for the federal development programme.
The Rs 541 billion PSDP represents an increase of
11.54 per cent over last year’s PSDP of Rs 485 billion. Opposing any cut
in the 2008-09 PSDP, the provincial finance and planning ministers argued
that the proposed increase of Rs 56 billion was essential for the revival
of economic growth in the coming fiscal year, which commences on July 1.
The provincial ministers further argued that increased
spending was required in the infrastructure and social sectors to meet the
needs of the four provinces.
The NEC accepted the point of view of the four
provinces and the planning commission and approved the PSDP of Rs 541
billion proposed by the Panning Commission.
But the Planning Commission didn’t get everything
its own way. Following interventions by the federal Finance Minister and
the Governor of the State Bank of Pakistan, Dr Shamshad Akhtar, the NEC
reduced the Panning Commission’s proposed Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
growth target for 2008-09 from 6.5 per cent to 5.5 per cent.
The NEC also directed the Planning Commission to
revise projections for the Macro Economic Framework for the coming fiscal
year. Growth targets for the agricultural, manufacturing and services
sectors will also be revised in line with the revised GDP growth target of
5.5 per cent.
Of the Rs 341 billion federal portion of the PSDP, Rs
75 billion has been allocated for infrastructure development, including Rs
10 billion for hydel projects, Rs 9.8 billion for the national programme
to improve irrigation water courses, Rs 14 billion for canals and Rs 2.2
billion for canal-lining.
Over the years, sub-soil water seepage from unlined
irrigation canals have become a major source of water-logging, requiring a
series of salinity-control and reclamation programmes (SCARPS) in Punjab
and Sindh to lower the water table and bring salinity-affected
agricultural land back into production. Since the early 1960s, more than
70 SCARPS have been built to date by the Water and Power Development
Authority.
Given Pakistan’s (the former West Pakistan’s)
burgeoning population (which has grown more than 4-fold since 1951 to an
estimated 165 million today), a shortage of fresh water is likely to be
the most serious resource problem the country will face in the years
ahead. To compound the problem, global warming is troubling irrigated
basins like the Indus, where 70 per cent of the cropland is irrigated.
New storage reservoirs will have to be built on the
Indus and other rivers to compensate for the reduction in storage capacity
of the existing reservoirs – Tarbela and Mangla – due to silting. The
Mangla Dam Raising Project being built by Wapda will raise the height of
Mangla Dam by 40 feet, resorting much of the reservoir’s capacity lost
due to silting since the dam was completed in 1968.
Pakistan has become an increasingly water-stressed
country and there are several reasons to expect water shortages to grow
worse. These include increases in irrigated land for boosting food
production to feed a growing population, including growth on the
country’s urban population, requiring a large increase in water
supplies.
Another serious long-term problem is salination. When
irrigation water seeps into the soil, it absorbs mineral salts from the
earth, flushing them to the surface. As the water evaporates, these salts
dry out in the fields, gradually destroying their fertility. According to
one estimate, some 25 per cent of Pakistan’s cultivated land has been
damaged in this way. Recovering poisoned fields is vastly expensive. The
environmental damage caused by man-managed irrigation schemes is a time
bomb that threatens to reverse the gains in agricultural production made
by past schemes.
Pakistan is currently using half its available run-off
- that is, the water that falls as rain and snow in the country and is
collected in rivers, lakes and streams, and is drawing half as much from
underground springs and acquifers. It
has been estimated that by 2025 demand will reach 92 per cent pf the
entire run-off. Pakistan faces an awkward choice. Either it must reduce
the amount of water used by agriculture and urban areas, or it must make
huge investments totalling tens of billions of dollars to develop new
supplies and build more storage reservoirs. Feeding Pakistan in the years
ahead will require such gigantic schemes to be built and it will require
farmers to use water more efficiently.
At present only one-third of the water used for
irrigation actually goes into producing crops – the rest is wasted.
Using water more efficiently would also being environmental benefits.
Cities and their demands will also grow. In 1951, at the time of the first
post-independence national census, there was only one city in Pakistan
with more than a million people: Karachi. Today, there are more than
eight, with Karachi alone now at an estimated 16 million, Lahore at 8
million, and several others at over a million.
Water supplies are also essential for industrial
development. Up to now, few cities have found the industrial development
circumscribed by water shortages – a considerable achievement. With
competing demands for water, however, shortages are likely to occur with
increasing frequency in the years ahead.
Water supply in the lower Indus basin is falling
behind agricultural and urban demand, particularly in Karachi where
population growth exceeds the physical capacity of the public water
system. Conflict between the provinces on the Indus basin water obstructs
cooperation on lower water basin issues.
Karachi currently gets a maximum of 650 million
gallons a day of water from all sources (Indus, Hub, etc.). Based on a
population of 16 million, that works out to a maximum water availability
figure of about 40 gallons a day per person – well below the 70 gallons
a day per person figure recommended by international agencies for urban
centres in developing countries.
Of the 140 million acre feet (maf) of water annually
available in Pakistan, only about 40 maf reach the Indus delta (though it
has been much less in recent years), which supports important fish and
shellfish industries. The lower reaches of the river support unique
riparian species, but are ecologically stressed by upstream impounding of
water and sediment.
In recent decades, surface irrigation and drainage
problems have stimulated groundwater development, involving the
installation of hundreds of thousands of public and private tube wells. In
May 2001, the government said it had directed the Water and Power
Development Authority to install another 20,000 tube wells to augment
groundwater supplies. But a great many more than 20,000 will be needed to
meet the growing demand for water. Also, will the government tell us how many of those
additional 20,000 tube wells have been installed to date? Or is this yet
another example of a scheme that was announced by the government of the
day but failed to materialise? Fixing
targets for PSDP spending on government projects is all very well, but any
PSDP is only as good as its implementation.
According to the new government, the 2007-08 PSDP of
Rs 485 billion fell short by Rs 190 billion due to inefficiencies in its
implementation. What steps does the present government intend to take to
ensure that the same thing doesn’t happen to the 2008-09 PSDP of Rs 542
billion approved by the National Economic Council?
|