|
|
| |
perspective
60 years later…
Palestine has been an unsolved issue for so long that the
world often seems to think it doesn’t exist. Now, documentary
filmmakers are at the forefront of keeping it alive.
By Saba
Imtiaz
in Amman, Jordan
|
| |
 |
| |
| Amman,
the capital of Jordan - may not have the fantastic architecture, the
centuries old lanes, or the other landmarks that are the hallmark
of other Middle Eastern capitals like Cairo or Damascus, but what
it certainly does have is a fantastic social itinerary. Darat al Funun,
an art gallery/working space for artists regularly showcases exhibits
featuring artists from the Middle East, as well as documentaries focusing
on the region. Two of the most notable ones I have had the chance
to see lately include The Iron Wall and Occupation 101, both part
of a series of films being screened to commemorate Nabka (Arabic for
Catastrophe), marking 60 years of occupation by Israel. |
| |
The
Iron Wall was an eye opener - even to someone used to having seen/heard
so much about the conflict through Pakistan’s pro Palestinian
media. The Iron Wall is an eye opener, because it coldly details how,
over the past 6 decades, Israel has systematically obliterated any
possibility of there ever existing as of a viable Palestinian state.
The wall, a shocking symbol of what can only be defined as apartheid
in the 21st century, is there for a reason: to create small pockets
of Palestinian villages, cut off from the infrastructure, housing
and sources of income for Palestinians. Using graphs and maps, The
Iron Wall shows how the settlements built by Israel have consumed
the major part of the West Bank. |
 |
| |
| It
delves into Zionist beliefs, coupled by how successive Israeli governments
have used the policy of settlement building to strengthen their
presence throughout Occupied Palestine, and to cement those settlements,
have built - what is indeed an iron wall - to fence off those settlements
from the Palestinian villages. They cut through viable agricultural
land, houses, water sources - and in the opinion of the experts
interviewed for the film, is not a security measure, but the last
bolt in the coffin of a dream of a Palestine free from occupation.
Coupled with heart rending stories - of families clutching their
olive trees and crying desperately in a vain attempt to prevent
Israeli bulldozers.
The document includes testimonials of Israeli soldiers of how Palestinian
towns in the West Bank are virtually under a siege from extremist
settlers who believe that all of the land mentioned in the Bible
is theirs for the taking, replete with scenes of places that are
ghost towns because of the constant state of curfew and violence.
Pieced in with this havoc, are quotes from an Israeli woman who,
like hundreds of other Israeli families are heavily incentivized
by the government to move to the new housing areas. The guilt rings
out in her voice as she feels trapped between the luxurious setting
of the new housing areas, and the realization that she is living
on someone else’s land.
Occupation 101, on the other hand, while focusing on the same issues,
is specifically geared to an American audience, which, using the
same testimonials and settlement issues as The Iron Wall, also presents
an overview of how, despite the Oslo Peace Process continuing in
the 1990s, the settlements and violence increased. It also provides
an insight into how the US Government has supported Israel financially
since the creation of the state, comparing it with US aid given
to developing countries.
Occupation 101 also delves into the conditions in Gaza, which few
media outlets have been able to gain access to or covered, highlighting
the story of an American citizen who was killed in 2003 by an Israeli
bulldozer in Rafah. While the documentary has received accolades
at various film festivals in the US, it remains to be seen what
the impact of a documentary such as this has had, given how one-sided
news coverage from the Middle East appears to be.
It is commendable of the gallery to screen the documentaries - but
these stories are meant for a wider audience, for an audience in
a country that is not a stone’s throw away from Occupied Palestine
and Israel, but for those that are completely unaware to the nature
of the conflict and what this means to the daily life of Israelis
and Palestinians who live in this state, day in and day out.
|
| |
|