For people travelling along national highways, scrapped
slices of road piled along the countryside are a much common sight. In
fact, they have become so much a part of the scenery that most people pass
by without even noticing while some consider it as trash marring their
view and only a few actually foresee the consequences for subsoil and
groundwater contamination.
These days a vast area on the lower periphery of Rawal
Dam, Islamabad, is cluttered with road debris removed from old pavements
to build a new six-lane freeway linking the airport and the city. Here,
the soil remains saturated for at least part of the year due to the
seepage from the lake and hence concerns arise about the leachate from the
saturated soil matrix containing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs),
which will ultimately appear in the groundwater. While the use of coal tar
in road construction presents unacceptable hazards to environment, dumping
the debris containing coal tar is simply unimaginable. Realising the
overall environmental consequences, it pains to see authorities
responsible for the safety of the environment so indifferent to these
issues of today. Let us analyze what can go wrong.
Historically, coal tar has been extensively used for
coating road stone to improve adhesion between stones. In the last few
decades, coal tar was replaced with bitumen-based products to reduce
environmental hazards. Use of asphalt is recommended now over coal tar and
bitumen for environmental reasons. This is because coal tar is a
condensation by-product obtained by burning coal in the absence of air.
More than 400 compounds have been identified in coal tar including complex
combinations of hydrocarbons, phenols and heterocyclic oxygen, sulphur and
nitrogen.
Bitumen, on the other hand, is derived from the
distillation of crude petroleum, and is also a complex mixture containing
a large number of chemical components but of relatively high molecular
weight.
Both coal tar and bitumen contain PAHs but the later
has significantly lesser concentration. PAHs are carcinogenic while the
chronic effects of some of the constituents in coal tar include damage to
the liver and harmful effects on the kidney, heart, lungs and the nervous
system. PAH mixtures can possibly be phototoxic as well.
Since the concentration of PAHs found in coal tar
products is higher than in bitumens, the carcinogenic potential of coal
tar was well recognized and widely accepted since 1985 by the
International Agency for Research on Cancer. Coal tar is completely
soluble in a wide range of organic solvents but it is also slightly
soluble in water and may enter in the groundwater by leaching. The water
soluble compounds will tend to move to groundwater and/or subsurface soils
(where degradation rates are typically slower) when the soil gets
saturated especially during the monsoons. The leachability of coal tar
products is especially high due to the fact that these compounds are not
adsorbed by soil particles. New concepts of solute movement through porous
media suggest that the leaching substance can actually by-pass much of the
matrix and can appear in groundwater quickly.
When open to atmosphere, coal tar breaks down very fast
into benzene, toluene, phenol, naphthalene, anthracene, and other volatile
compounds in hot, windy, and sunny climates. The product compounds are
expected to disappear quickly by evaporation and degradation into the
environment in our climatic conditions. The fact that coal tar contains
compounds of substantially lower molecular weight, many of which are
liquid at ambient temperatures, is a matter of great concern.
Therefore, spreading coal tar debris should be
prohibited to safeguard the environment - at least in the capital. The
continued disposal of coal tar products flies in the face of global best
practice.
The Pakistan Environmental Agency, Ministry of
Environment, the body trusted with the responsibility to safeguard our
environment, probably never raised the issue at any forum neither did it
talk about the realization and capacity to measure the parameters.
One hopes that PAK-EPA were built on scientific
foundations especially when the Ministry of Environment has a bureaucratic
stone at each corner which apparently cannot be moved by any level of
urgency or dearth. Finally, one can only pray to the contractors to
consider alternatives, recycling for example, as an obligation to the
civil society. Otherwise, the environmental impact will be ruinous and
everlasting.