analysis
A colonial army
The barrage of public criticism directed at the army for its over-arching role is a qualitatively new phenomenon

By Aasim Sajjad Akhtar

At a time when the Pakistan Army faces the most acute criticism in its history, it is imperative to study the historical genesis of this state institution, in particular the (dis)continuities between the British Indian Army and its Pakistani successor.


Newswatch
The morning after the night before

By Kaleem Omar

The parliamentary form of government was invented in Britain, which, of course, is why the British parliament is known as the mother of parliaments. But the British writer and satirist Hillaire Belloc took a somewhat cynical view of things when he wrote after the British elections of 1922: "The accurs'd power that goes with privilege, / And women and champagne and bridge, / Broke, and democracy resumed its reign, / That goes with bridge and women and champagne."

industry
SMEs -- heading for nowhere

SMEs in Pakistan have constantly been lacking adequate access to financing from the formal sector, because of which they have to take credit from the informal sector at a much higher interest rate

By Hamid Waleed
The new Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Policy, unveiled by the government recently, has invited a lot of criticism from the concerned circles. The stakeholders have expressed the fear that it would further marginalise the small entrepreneurs; while, at the same time, it would strengthen the big ones. 

Countering tax evasion and money laundering
Astute and stringent measures need to be devised to curb tax evasion, so that the burden of taxes can be distributed fairly and justly

By Huzaima Bukhari and Dr Ikramul Haq
It is a curious paradox of Pakistan's economy that while there is a dearth of money for industrial growth and public sector projects on the one hand, a colossal amount of unaccounted for cash is circulating in the country, in search of further undercover gains, on the other. What is even more unfortunate is that this social evil inherent in our tax system necessitates additional tax burden on those who are law-abiding.

extremism
Media and extremism

The concluding article of this series analyses the role of media in promoting or curbing terrorism

By R Khan 
In the modern age, the media has become so much integrated with social institutions that sociologists have started regarding it as one of them. The media's positive as well as negative impact on other social institutions has been a topic of intense debate among researchers around the globe. Just like its role in promoting or curbing any societal trend, the media also has a very strong bearing on the phenomenon of terrorism.


Bypassing rules
The organisational culture for infrastructure development is usually derived from the military: it does not allow criticism, least of all accountability

By Dr Noman Ahmed
Following the collapse of Karachi Northern Bypass Bridge, the usual steps are being taken without even examining the situation. For instance, the National Highway Authority (NHA) has instituted a routine inquiry into the incident. This appears absurd as any inquiry cannot be considered appropriate and impartial if it does not hold all the concerned parties accountable and liable to response.


debate
Time to deal, Mr president!

An alternate but composite political formula to deal with the complex political and constitutional vortex facing the country

By Arshed H Bhatti 
One has termed this formula 'National Deal for Reconciliation and Harmony'. It is conceived to be a win-win scenario for all contenders, most of all the citizens and civilians; and is supposed to begin from September 10, when Nawaz Sharif and his younger bother Shahbaz Sharif are due to land in Islamabad. It offers a plan of complete transition from a military-dominated state, democracy and governance to a civilian-led dispensation by April 2008.


A cruel custom
Three-year-old Iqra was made to pay for her father's illicit relations with a woman

By Delawar Jan Banori

Iqra was too young to even properly say 'Abai' (mom) and 'Baba' (dad) when her father agreed to give her in 'Swara'. The three-year-old girl is the daughter of Pervez Khan, a resident of Jaffarabad in Lower Dir, NWFP. She was set to be shifted to her in-laws' house on August 31, but was stopped thanks to the media and subsequent action by the police.


For whom the bell tolls
Shakeel Pathan raided the private jails in Sindh and daringly rescued bonded labourers

By Shahid Husain
Human rights have become a 'flavour-of-the-month' term in contemporary politics and even dictatorial regimes try to give the impression that they respect them. However, it is difficult to find people in Pakistan who have actually waged struggle for human rights and have suffered as a result.



analysis
A colonial army
The barrage of public criticism directed at the army for its over-arching role is a qualitatively new phenomenon

By Aasim Sajjad Akhtar

At a time when the Pakistan Army faces the most acute criticism in its history, it is imperative to study the historical genesis of this state institution, in particular the (dis)continuities between the British Indian Army and its Pakistani successor.

This is an important exercise because the nature and practice of national armies cannot and should not be taken for granted, in the sense that the armies inherited by post-colonial Asian and African states were only occasionally armies of national liberation that had fought on behalf of the anti-colonial movement for the cause of freedom.

In comparison, in many Latin American states that gained independence from the Spanish and Portuguese rule in the early part of the twentieth century, armies of national liberation were constituted by independence movements that later became national armies in the new states. This was also true in the case of the Red Armies of China and Russia that spearheaded those countries' respective Communist revolutions.

Similarly the largely guerilla armies of Algeria, Cuba and Vietnam secured unprecedented victories in their freedom / revolutionary struggles against regular, organised armies that on the face of it were far superior to them in terms of size, weaponry and other infrastructure.

Aptly, many of these armies of national liberation / revolution were called the 'People's Army'. This reflected the immense importance of implicit or explicit public support for these armies -- particularly in the case of guerillas -- without which it is unlikely that the physical battles of the freedom movements could have been won.

People's armies were also conceived of as playing a major role in building the new society, not just through their physical exploits but also as members of a collective that shared values and a commitment to meeting the people's needs. It can be argued that many people's armies have since evolved in a very different direction, complicity undermining the people's will.

But there are still examples of modern-day armies that remain committed to the principles of national liberation and the people who comprise their nation. Among others, one of the most prominent examples of such an army at the present-time is that of Venezuela, which has been a crucial component of ex-army officer President Hugo Chavez' Bolivarian Revolution.

For a large number of Pakistanis, the idea of a people's army is increasingly difficult to reconcile with the very clear and consistent self-aggrandisement that has characterised the army's conduct in the economic and political spheres of Pakistan's social life for about three decades. The discontent has increased slowly but surely, and has reached a feverish pitch in the last six months, particularly during the lawyers' movement for the restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry.

It is important to bear in mind, however, that the barrage of public criticism (rightly) directed at the army for its over-arching role is a qualitatively new phenomenon. For most part of Pakistan's history, the army was projected as, and considered by many to be, a people's army. At the very least, this is what was assumed.

In practice, however, the army was considered as a people's army by only a certain segment of the population. For the under-represented ethno-national groups, the army was anything but a people's army -- in fact, it was very much perceived to be a colonial army that considered its primary objective to be the subjugation of the very people it purported to protect.

This was a legacy inherited from the British Indian Army, which performed two basic functions for the colonialists. On the one hand, it protected as well as extended the empire's external frontiers ranging from as far west as the Indian subcontinent to Australia and New Zealand in the Pacific. Indian soldiers travelled all over the world in the name of the British Empire, killing and being killed in tens of thousands along the way.

However, arguably the more important function of the colonial army was to ensure order within India. In other words, the army was the bastion of colonial rule -- it was charged with the responsibility of guarding the state as well as insulating it from the challenges posed by rebellious elements.

In exchange for the services rendered by Indian officers and soldiers to the British empire, land was allotted generously to them, particularly in the newly irrigated parts of Punjab and Sindh. Much of the rank-and-file of the British Indian Army hailed from Punjab and the NWFP, under the guise of a quasi-biological theory of racial affinity that designated these regions to be the home of 'martial castes'.

The internal order function, the ethnically-skewed composition of the army and the practice of rewarding army men for serving the political objectives of the state have remained major characteristics of the Pakistan Army in the post-independence period.

It is horrifying that the army has fought almost full-fledged wars against dissenting ethno-national movements, including that of the Bengalis in 1970-71, the Balochs in the 1970s and at present, the Sindhis in 1983, and the Pakhtuns on various occasions in the last 60 years. More generally, the army has directly undermined political parties by intimidating, harassing, arresting, torturing and even killing dissidents, primarily those associated with left-of-centre ideologies.

The reason why these practices did not necessarily invoke outrage in Punjab until very recently -- arguably the reason why the army no longer enjoys a pristine image in the areas in which it traditionally did has more to do with its interference in the country's economic affairs rather than its repressive role -- has to do with the fact that the loyalty of Punjabis continued to be 'bought' in much the same way as the British had done.

It should not be forgotten that the British decision to make Punjab the bastion of its rule had to do with the fact that the province stood with the empire during the War of Independence in 1857. Thus there is a long history of mutually-reinforcing interests, though contradictions of an increasingly serious nature are now emerging.

The Pakistan Army has also served the purposes of western imperialism for a large part of its 60-year history. However it has been an unpopular policy for the most part, with only the Afghan War in the 1980s perceived as a just one by the country's people.

This reflects not only on Pakistan's continued geo-strategic importance, but also on the sensibilities of the army officers who have always remained close to the West in terms of personal lifestyles and ideological inclinations. This has arguably changed in the last 25 years or so, but clearly internal ideological divisions in the army have still not compromised the imperative of unity vis a vis its relations with external powers.

It is then simply a matter of stating fact that the Pakistan Army remains a colonial one. Perhaps the most damning characteristic of colonial armies is their arrogance, and their unshakeable belief in their moral and physical superiority. For 60 years, through a variety of means, the Pakistan Army has managed to put off the inevitable surge of anti-army sentiment that now has finally come to the fore.

One fears, however, that even after the intense public scrutiny to which it has been subject, the army -- and particularly its high command -- remains imbued with the elitist ethos that it has inherited from its colonial past. Thus, it is likely to fight against its own people for control over this state called Pakistan until the bitter end. One can only hope that the generals consider what history has proven time and again -- there can be only one winner in the battle between the coloniser and the colonised.



Newswatch
The morning after the night before

By Kaleem Omar

The parliamentary form of government was invented in Britain, which, of course, is why the British parliament is known as the mother of parliaments. But the British writer and satirist Hillaire Belloc took a somewhat cynical view of things when he wrote after the British elections of 1922: "The accurs'd power that goes with privilege, / And women and champagne and bridge, / Broke, and democracy resumed its reign, / That goes with bridge and women and champagne."

John F. Kennedy would have agreed with Belloc. In 1961, Kennedy said: "It is one of the ironies of our time that the techniques of a harsh and repressive system should be able to instill discipline and ardour in its servants -- while the blessings of liberty have too often stood for privilege, materialism and a life of ease."

Then, there was this piece of graffiti seen on a wall in London in 1979: "If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal."

Bernard Baruch, the American financier who was the first one to use the term 'cold war' in a testimony before the US Senate War Investigating Committee on October 24, 1948, said: "Vote for the man who promises least -- he'll be the least disappointing."

Some Pakistani politicians and other holders of high office here have undoubtedly taken Baruch's message to heart. That's why the last song on their hit parade is 'I'll Never Promise you a Rose Garden'. We are forever being promised rose gardens that either fail to materialise or else turn out to be a patch of weeds.

Elections in this country and many others, too, for that matter, are like cobwebs, which may catch small flies, but let wasps and hornets break through.

French writer Simone de Beauvoir (1908-86) -- much associated with the Existentialist movement; companion of Jean Paul Sartre until his death in 1980; author of the novels 'She Came to Stay' and 'The Mandarins', several volumes of autobiography, and 'The Second Sex' (1953), one of the earliest statements of the modern feminist movement and perhaps her most influential book -- said: "The ballot box is a most inadequate mechanism of change." However, she did not say anything about there being a better mechanism of change.

American sociologist Edgar Z Friedenburg, better known by the pseudonym 'RD Laing', said back in 1973: "To vote, then, may make the voter feel as if he has accepted some meaningless badge from an authority he dare not admit he loathes."

Writing in the 'Daily Mail' newspaper in 1964, British journalist Bernard Levin said: "Ask a man which way he is going to vote, and he will probably tell you. Ask him, however, why, and vagueness is all."

Arch right-wing American columnist George F Will said in a piece in 'Newsweek' magazine in 1976: "Voters do not decide issues. They decide who will decide issues."

In Pakistan, elections tend not to be about issues but about political personalities. It is another matter, however, that many of our worthy political personalities would not recognise an issue if they tripped over it. Even so, issues have a way of tripping up politicians.

At a dinner party in Karachi a few years ago, a well-known Sindhi politician once said: "Sain, when in Rome, do as the Romanians do." I won't name him because I don't want to embarrass him.

James Dale Davidson, former executive director of the US National Taxpayers Union, said back in 1978: "Democracy is that form of government where everybody gets what the majority deserves."

The 1948 Hollywood film 'A Foreign Affair' had one of the characters saying: "If you give a hungry man a loaf of bread, that's democracy. If you leave the wrapper on, it's imperialism."

'The London Observer' newspaper quoted German novelist Gunter Grass as saying back in 1965: "The job of a citizen is to keep his mouth open."

The British novelist of today is a neatly-dressed, soft-spoken indoor horticulturalist tending a highly prized and exotic hothouse plant. Not for him the call of the wild. One look at shaggy, pipe-smoking, beer-drinking Grass tells you that such a life holds no appeal for him. He looks like, and is, a trouble-maker, a rabble-rouser. And, as such, he has a large popular audience.

Grass has not been afraid to speak his mind strongly on issues throughout his life. Even in Germany, his idiosyncratic views are said to have annoyed both conservatives and social democrats at different times.

Then, of course, there is Prince Philip. Visiting Paraguay in 1962, he once said: "It's a pleasant change to be in a country that isn't ruled by its own people." Dictators of every stripe would say: "Right on, Prince Philip." Indeed, they might even make him an honorary dictator.

German philosopher Herbert Marcuse took a somewhat similar view. He was quoted by the 'London Daily Telegraph' newspaper in 1972 as saying: "The general will is always wrong. Wrong inasmuch as it objectively counteracts the possible transformation of society into more humane ways of life. In the dynamic of corporate capitalism, the fight for democracy thus tends to assume anti-democratic forms."

In his book 'Minority Report' (1956), American essayist and journalist HL Mencken said: "Under democracy, one party always devotes its chief energies to trying to prove that the other party is unfit to rule -- and both commonly succeed, and are right."

In Pakistan, however, we usually have dozens of parties contesting elections, though some of them are little more than tonga parties -- meaning parties whose total membership would fit into a tonga. And while tongas may have become pretty much a thing of the past in many parts of this country, we still have plenty of tonga parties around. The forthcoming elections are likely to see scores of tonga parties in the fray.

Seventy parties contested the 2002 elections -- all of them clamouring that their rivals were unfit to rule. That's why I didn't vote. I couldn't decide just which party was the least unfit to rule. Happy elections, everybody!



industry
SMEs -- heading for nowhere
SMEs in Pakistan have constantly been lacking adequate access to financing from the formal sector, because of which they have to take credit from the informal sector at a much higher interest rate

By Hamid Waleed

The new Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Policy, unveiled by the government recently, has invited a lot of criticism from the concerned circles. The stakeholders have expressed the fear that it would further marginalise the small entrepreneurs; while, at the same time, it would strengthen the big ones.

Having a total outlay of Rs 13.128 billion, the first-ever SMEs Policy aims at creating a conducive environment for the growth of small business units to ensure more jobs and, ultimately, a considerable reduction in poverty. In broader spectrum, the policy has initially identified four major areas -- Small Business Development Centre, Credit Information Bureau, Business Cluster and Credit Enhancement Mechanism.

The policy names a number of initiatives with regard to its implementation, including the establishment of an SMEs Credit Guarantee Agency with a fund of Rs three billion and an SMEs Promotion Council with a fund of Rs 143.72 million; and setting up of an SMEs Subcontracting Exchange costing Rs 26.09 million, an SMEs Development Institute costing Rs 115.66 million and an SMEs Export House costing Rs 156.89 million.

To ensure proper implementation of the SMEs Policy, a permanent monitoring mechanism has been proposed in the form of National Committee on SMEs in addition to the four provincial committees on SMEs. In this regard, the government has approved a fund of Rs 25.82 million for the Policy Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation Unit.

Simple allocation of funds, however, is not enough to bring about a drastic change on the ground. The critics strongly believe that the definition of SMEs given in the policy is aimed less at their promotion and more at that of big companies. The policy sets the SME employment size of up to 250, paid up capital of up to Rs 25 million and annual sales of up to Rs 250 million. According to these critics, the definition of SMEs given in the Medium-Term Development Framework (MTDF), unlike the new policy, sets the employment size of up to 50 employees, and paid up capital of Rs 2-20 million.

The consultation process initiated by the Small and Medium Enterprises Authority (SMEDA) last year proved to be a futile exercise, as the turn over of SMEs representatives remained lower than expectations. The SMEDA, eventually, decided to expand the consultation process to smaller cities after getting a poor response in big cities like Karachi, Lahore and Peshawar. Due to these reasons, the consultation process lingered on for months without any concrete outcome.

During the consultation process, SMEs representatives from Peshawar also pointed out that the government should safeguard the interests of micro-level enterprises and demanded a separate definition for them in the new policy. However, their plea fell on deaf ears and the SMEs Policy has so far failed to address the micro-level cottage industry.

SMEs have played a key role in developing economies of various South East Asian countries -- Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, Hong Kong and China to name a few. Some countries of Latin America and India have also been concentrating their efforts on developing this sector. In Pakistan, SMEs constitute nearly 90 per cent of all the enterprises, they employ 80 per cent of the non-agricultural labour force and their share in the annual Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is almost 40 per cent. Despite this, they have constantly been lacking adequate access to financing from the formal sector, because of which they have to take credit from the informal sector at a much higher interest rate.

The SMEs sector has not only been highly unorganised, but it has also been one of the most ignored sectors in Pakistan. Half-hearted government policies over the years have further compounded their problems. Despite tall claims by successive government to put the house in order, the viability of SMEs still depends largely on the large-scale manufacturing (LSM) sector.

It is an irony that the SMEs sector has never been taken seriously by the country's rulers, who looked after the interests of big industrialists at the cost of SMEs. Despite such supportive measures, the growth in the LSM sector is stagnant over the last 30 years -- it was growing at the rate of 16 per cent in 1985 and is still growing at the same rate.

The first genuine effort to streamline the SME sector was made in the last era of former prime minister Nawaz Sharif, when SMEDA was formed with Khawaja Bilal, a hosiery tycoon, as its first head. Initially, since the prime minister was himself looking after the authority's day-to-day affairs, many efforts were made to make the SME sector more functional and a number of related projects were launched.

Not only did SMEDA became functional, other government ministries and departments also started taking notice of its performance. Meanwhile SMEDA launched the Textile Vision 2005, a first-of-its-kind initiative that attracted an impressive investment of $5 billion. The realisation that the major focus of the Textile Vision 2005 was limited to the basic textiles only dawned upon the policy-makers much later. As a result, a major chunk of the new investment went to the basic textiles, and SME sectors like garments and hosiery were more or less ignored. This negatively affected not only the value-added sector's production level, but also the country's exports.

After Nawaz Sharif was ousted from power, SMEDA was given under the control of the Ministry of Industries. This badly affected the authority's functioning, for which SMEs had to pay the price. SMEDA, as a matter of fact, continued to do cosmetic arrangements in the name of SMEs. It is another thing that the hosiery units of Khawja Bilal, the first head of SMEDA, have also closed down by now.

Other than the SMEs Policy, SMEDA has been actively pursuing the One Village One Product project on the direction of Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz. No impressive development, however, has so far been witnessed in this regard. Similarly, business incubators for women entrepreneurs were introduced at a limited scale. They are yet to show results either. All this suggests but one thing -- the chances of success of the new SME Policy are bleak.

 


Countering tax evasion and money laundering
Astute and stringent measures need to be devised to curb tax evasion, so that the burden of taxes can be distributed fairly and justly

By Huzaima Bukhari and Dr Ikramul Haq

It is a curious paradox of Pakistan's economy that while there is a dearth of money for industrial growth and public sector projects on the one hand, a colossal amount of unaccounted for cash is circulating in the country, in search of further undercover gains, on the other. What is even more unfortunate is that this social evil inherent in our tax system necessitates additional tax burden on those who are law-abiding.

The most important problem faced by a government under a fiscal reform programme is that of devising astute and stringent measures to curb tax evasion, so that the burden of taxes can be distributed fairly and justly between people belonging to different walks of life. The honest taxpayers need to be safeguarded, as day by day they are being disillusioned by the fact that tax-evaders are paying nothing in connivance with their friends in the tax machinery. This unholy alliance between tax-evaders and corrupt tax officials has to be eliminated as a first and foremost step, if we want to initiate any meaningful change in the tax system.

Responsible for the collection of federal taxes, the Central Board of Revenue (CBR) has miserably failed to introduce any comprehensive plan to counter massive tax evasion and money laundering. It has yet not devised a computer-based, reliable tax intelligent system, despite the fact that it has a market-wage oriented company, Pakistan Revenue Automation Limited (PRAL), at its disposal with huge funds from international donors. This failure, coupled with corrupt practices (according to a rough estimate, at least Rs 250-375 billion go annually into the pockets of tax officials) has contributed to the generation of enormous black money in Pakistan.

Large-scale tax evasion and the existence of a large black economy, while resulting in colossal loss of revenue to the state, tend to reduce the built-in elasticity of a fiscal system to the extent that the tax evaded income is spent on goods and services that help to generate inflationary pressures and raise prices of real property.

In the context of the prevailing challenge to combat terrorism, together with the money laundering crisis and the problem of ever-growing black money (which according to official and independent experts is around Rs 2.5 trillion or about 70 per cent of the total economy), there is an urgent need to introduce a well-thought out anti-money laundering law to prevent this huge money from becoming a lethal weapon in the hands of mafias, who now are in control of economy as well as the government. However, before introducing such a law, it is important to identify the sources generating black money. If such sources are not blocked, black money will keep on thriving notwithstanding the existence of stringent laws.

According to a conservative estimate, an amount of Rs. 800 billion is generated every year in Pakistan by the parallel economy. Add to this the black money generated through smuggling in goods and narcotics trade -- Rs 300-500 billion. This amounts to a whooping Rs 1,300 billion. When the presence of black money is so apparent, why its criminal accumulation and generation is not revealed and the offenders not punished? This question continues to baffle the minds of honest citizens, who ask whether it is on account of lack of political will or collusion of tax dodgers and tax administrators?

During the last 25 years, money launderers in Pakistan have hardly needed any international channel, as all support from the state was available at home. Even today, if somebody brings money (earned from whatever sources, including drug trade) into Pakistan through normal banking channels, the State Bank and tax authorities do not pose any question about the source.

Tax evaders, drug-arm-human traffickers, rent-seekers and terrorist apparatus remit millions of rupees into the country every year from bank accounts maintained in various countries in fictitious names. This money, in the hands of drug-mafia, tax evaders and terrorist networks, has made them invincible, besides making life harder and harder for those who earn from legitimate sources.

In the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, promulgated on the dictates of International Monetary Fund (IMF) on September 13, 2001, a special provision {section 111(4)} has been inserted, facilitating the money launderers to remit their ill-gotten money through banking channels; and surrender the foreign currency to the State Bank and get Pakistani rupees as encashment.

This way, they can escape not only taxation but any query from the CBR. This scheme, presumably announced as a measure to attract huge foreign funds, succeeded immensely as foreign reserves of Pakistan have crossed the $16 billion mark in the wake of this facility. This scheme has been used liberally and cleverly by the Pakistani drug syndicates and tax dodgers to launder their money under the state's patronage.

The people hooked on ill-gotten wealth for the last many years know for certain that after every two or three years, there will be an amnesty scheme giving them a chance to get their income whitened by paying far less an amount than what they would have been required to pay under the normal income tax regime. It is a tragic situation where the entire state apparatus is subservient to those who blatantly manage to hide their income and wealth. It is an ugly joke with those who are paying their taxes honestly at much higher rates than those offered to tax evaders.

The ugliest face of black money emerges in the corridors of power, political as well as administrative. No country other than Pakistan knows better the dangers of allowing money launderers and drug traffickers to get an upper hand. We are at present not only facing a drug-abusing population of nearly four million, mostly young, but also many terrorist organisations, which by themselves are a threat to the government. The fact is that a cartel or a group of cartels have become so powerful that they can work out agreements with terrorists and saboteurs to undermine the authority of the state.

Pakistan has been facing a perpetual crisis of fiscal deficit (for fiscal year 2006-07, despite record collection of Rs 841 billion by the CBR, it was Rs 200.5 billion) for the last many decades. Amongst many causes for this malady is the ever-growing size of the underground economy. No serious effort has been made by successive governments, both military and civil, to determine the loss of revenue due to the existence of underground economy, not to talk of devising concrete counter measures to bring enormous untaxed money into the mainstream of economy. Rampant corruption and unprecedented tolerance towards black money has made Pakistan a state where the very survival of public institutions is at stake at the hands of ruthless forces representing money power.

One of the worst consequences of black money and tax evasion is their pernicious effect on the general moral fabric of society. They put integrity at a discount, and place a premium on vulgar and ostentatious display of wealth. This shatters the faith of the people man in the dignity of honest labour and virtuous living. It is, therefore, no exaggeration to say that ill-gotten wealth is like a cancerous growth in the country's economy, which if not checked in time is certain to culminate in its death.

It is not possible to determine the precise amount of revenue loss and size of black money or informal economy in Pakistan. According to an estimate by the World Bank, the country suffered a revenue loss amounting to $18.08 billion in 2005-06 because of smuggling. In 2005, its quantum was estimated at over $14 billion. According to government's own admission (page 262 of Economic Survey 2006-07), tax loss under the head of granting exemption to capital gain earners alone during the fiscal year 2006-07 was Rs 112.45 billion.

Besides direct monetary costs of corruption, other significant costs --such as loss of government credibility, spread of injustice, distortions in resource allocations, and loss of foreign and local investment -- are destroying the very fibre of civil society in Pakistan. According to figures released by independent quarters during 2006, the parallel economy is growing at an alarming rate of 22.93 per cent per annum.

Every fifth rupee transacted in Pakistan is black, according to the volume of black money generated in the year 2005-06 -- Rs. 900 billion. This also means that everyday tax fraud in Pakistan exceeds Rs 247 million. This is not the final count. We have yet not accounted for kickbacks in foreign trade, smuggling (for example, huge tax evasion in the name of Afghan Transit Trade) and foreign exchange racketeering, apart from narcotic trade and other criminal traffic.

It is tragic that in a country where billions of rupees are being made on daily basis in speculative transactions in real estate and shares, tax-to-GDP ratio is pathetically low at just 9.5 per cent in 2006-07. The government seems least bothered to tax undocumented economy and benami {name-lender) transactions. The mighty sections of society are engaged in these transactions and the CBR, being their handmaid, has neither will nor ability to tax them. It exposes the uselessness of the CBR as an institution to tap the real tax potential of the country. So, it hardly matters that its name is being changed to Federal Board of Revenue or anything else.

 

The writers are tax advisers. Email:

www.huzaimaikram.com

In the modern age, the media has become so much integrated with social institutions that sociologists have started regarding it as one of them. The media's positive as well as negative impact on other social institutions has been a topic of intense debate among researchers around the globe. Just like its role in promoting or curbing any societal trend, the media also has a very strong bearing on the phenomenon of terrorism.

Since terrorism is generally defined as "the politically-motivated violence", the media plays an important role by disseminating the motivations and demands of the perpetrators of violence. Through reflection and construction of the social reality, the media justifies or otherwise the cause and tactics of terrorists, and wins for them either supporters or opponents.

Dr Abdul Siraj, chairperson of the Mass Communication Department, Allama Iqbal Open University (AIOU), Islamabad, views that the media and terrorism have a "symbiotic" relationship.

"The extremists and terrorists want to remain in the news to obtain not only massive -- possibly worldwide -- publicity, but also the legitimisation that media attention gains for them in the eyes of their sympathisers. At the same time, terrorist acts provide an endless source of sensational and visually-compelling news stories for media organisations, thus boosting the number of their audiences or readers," he told TNS.

Dr Siraj further says that as long as media organisations exist, terrorists will continue to long for what former British prime minister Margaret Thatcher called "the oxygen of publicity". Similarly, he adds, as long as terrorists keep on committing acts of violence, the media will continue to scramble for sensational stories.

Media coverage of terrorist acts has been instrumental in the growing public knowledge about extremism in Pakistan. Experts believe that extremists and terrorists are fully aware of the importance of media for them. "Since getting media attention is critical to extremists, they even resort to terrorist acts to get their message across," views Khalid Sultan, a senior television producer.

The strategy employed by extremists and militants in Pakistan is to either control the media or, where this option is not feasible, to influence it favourably. In line with this strategy, they have been able to control journalists in the tribal areas as well as some parts of the NWFP, thereby effectively stopping the dissemination of facts.

The sway over media representatives has been achieved through naked aggression, threat of force and other violent means. In the process, many conscientious journalists working against the interest of extremists have lost their lives, while others have to bear with intimidation.

The extremists have also tried to influence the mainstream media by inviting its representatives to their hideouts and obliging them through 'information', which at best is one sided. They have also tried to advocate their cause and justify their tactics through the media, by using the good offices of their high-profile sympathisers within right-wing political parties like the Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal (MMA) and the Pakistan Muslim League (PML).

Through the use of an assortment of tactics to sway the mainstream media and by taking an anti-government stance, especially through propaganda that it is acting on behalf of foreign masters, extremists and militants try to construct the 'reality'. "Extremists have been able to achieve only limited success in this effort, as the traditional values of the media like liberalism have foiled their strategy to a great extent," views Khalid Sultan.

Another strategy employed by extremists, which has been critical to their overall goals, is to organise local media channels and networks, and target mainly rural areas and illiterate people. In this respect, FM radio stations have been the first choice of extremists -- as they are inexpensive and their contents can easily be directed to the desired target group. The FM radio stations in the hub of extremists have greatly served their purpose of radicalising the society, and winning legitimacy for them and their tactics.

The exact number of FM radio stations operating in the NWFP and the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) is not known, though some estimates put their figure at around 300. The Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) has already seized dozens of illegal FM radio stations in the NWFP, but its powers do not extend to FATA or the Provincially Administered Tribal Areas (PATA).

According to sources, some FM radio stations in FATA have been indoctrinating people -- including women -- to become suicide bombers. Though it is difficult to ascertain the impact of extremist messages being delivered through FM radio stations, it can be said with certainty that they do influence at least a part of the population.

"The propaganda tools used by terrorists -- such as communiques, broadsheets, pamphlets and magazines -- generally have a very limited circulation, but they do serve the vital function of maintaining ideological militancy among members and sympathisers, besides spreading militant ideas to other potentially sympathetic groups. It would be foolish to underestimate their importance as channels of propaganda, as means of inspiring fervour, and as means of explaining new policies of leaders to the rank and file," views Dr Siraj.

Internet is yet another tool which extremists in Pakistan have very effectively used to disseminate their messages and to terrorise the society. With terrorists unable to reach the mass audience directly due to the fear of law or other limitations, Internet has come in handy to serve their purposes.

Besides the strategies being used by terrorists and extremists to meet their ends, the violence that is portrayed in the media also indirectly serves their purposes. Television programmes in general have been instrumental in injecting violent trends in the Pakistani society, thus preparing a large number of people ready to join the ranks of terrorists in order to give a vent to their extremist feelings.

Violence in TV programmes may have an impact on viewers at a number of psychological levels, which can be broadly divided into cognitive, affective (emotional) and behavioural. Behavioural effects of TV violence have been hypothesised to act via a number of mechanisms, principal among which are catharsis, arousal, disinhibition, imitation and desensitisation. According to the catharsis hypothesis, accumulated aggressive impulses can be discharged by individuals if they become absorbed in violent events.

As the media research in this regard has been conducted in the United States and Western countries with almost universal education, it seems that the catharsis hypothesis is irrelevant to Pakistan. In our context, the other four hypotheses seem more relevant.

The arousal hypothesis suggests that watching violent television programmes can arouse viewers and make them excited. According to disinhibition hypothesis, watching violence on television may legitimise the use of violence by the viewer in real life by undermining social sanctions against behaving violently that normally work to inhibit such behaviour. This is typically the case in the Pakistani society.

The imitation hypothesis assumes that viewers, most especially very young ones, are inclined to learn from behaviours they see performed by TV characters and copy the actions themselves. It is hypothesised, for example, that children may learn that violence is a useful and appropriate way of overcoming one's problems. Alternatively, young viewers may copy their heroes' behaviours to become more like them, through a psychological process known as identification. The strategy of al-Qaeda and the Taliban to make movies depicting slaughtering of their opponents by children is a typical example of employing this hypothesis.

Desensitisation is another method which serves the purpose of extremists and terrorists indirectly. According to this hypothesis, repeated viewing of TV violence leads to a reduction in emotional responsiveness to violence on the screen and to an increased acceptance of violence in real life. In the light of the knowledge of extremists' use of media for their radical purposes, there is the need for an elaborate strategy to protect the society and the state from total radicalisation.

The writer is a journalist/analyst and researcher. Email: razapkhan@yahoo.comxxx



Bypassing rules
The organisational culture for infrastructure development is usually derived from the military: it does not allow criticism, least of all accountability

By Dr Noman Ahmed

Following the collapse of Karachi Northern Bypass Bridge, the usual steps are being taken without even examining the situation. For instance, the National Highway Authority (NHA) has instituted a routine inquiry into the incident. This appears absurd as any inquiry cannot be considered appropriate and impartial if it does not hold all the concerned parties accountable and liable to response.

Going by this logic, the NHA too must be answerable for this episode as any other stakeholder. Besides, the terms of reference that are normally worked out for these inquiry exercises are extremely limited. At best, they focus on the finding of immediate reasons for the collapse of the bridge. The people hardly have any faith in the conduct and outcome of such inquiries, as they have seldom generated any worthwhile result in the past.

The boiler explosion incident in North Karachi, collapse of Ran Pathani Railway Bridge, complete destruction of Makran Coastal Highway (another trumpeted feat of the NHA) and countless tragedies were investigated in the past. Soon thereafter, the matters fizzled out and the files were put in cold storage -- only to be taken out for witch-hunting in future.

Infrastructure development in Pakistan, including Karachi, is undertaken through a peculiar institutional format. There are federal bodies of various hues and profiles that are entrusted this task. The NHA, housing authorities, port authorities, land development agencies and power generation/distribution bodies are all examples.

Many of these bodies are only top-heavy organs, which sublet almost the entire outlay of their work. The organisational culture is usually derived from military organisations, with the top leadership coming from the same domain. It makes a happy combination for all concerned, as they are quick in taking all the credit if some project proves successful. They are equally skillful in preventing any disciplinary action if the projects fall apart. The military elements do not allow criticism, least of all accountability.

These organisations are very eager to involve their sister concerns. For instance, the Frontier Works Organisation (FWO) is usually hired whenever and wherever any project is initiated by the NHA. The FWO then acts as the supra-execution agency with further layers of contractors working under it. One can imagine the unnecessary rise in the cost of projects due to the multi-layered project design and implementation mechanism.

The multiplicity of organisations, their confusing and overlapping jurisdictions as well as absence of coordinating mechanisms, have been a prominent ailment in city development affairs. The city nazim absolves himself of the responsibility of looking after the management of the entire metropolis for the same reason.

It is true that different bodies do exist and continue to perform parallel functions related to infrastructure development and management tasks, but this is quite common in many large cities across the world. What makes them better managed is that the objectives of and approach to development and management are defined for the common people. In other words, the singularity of purpose does not make the multiplicity of managers a handicap.

What is peculiar to Karachi and many other cities of Pakistan is the lack of common purpose and sincerity in application at various ends. Thus one finds the most vital of urban infrastructure projects being transformed into nightmares due to organisational conflicts and managerial disarray. Bridge disaster is a case in point where agencies instantly began the blame game in order to off-load any responsibility of action to the next stakeholder.

Programming of development works is an important consideration in urban infrastructure management. It is usually carried out with great care to obtain the best value for municipal spending as well as to reduce the inconvenience to the citizens. The city has been turned into a hodge podge of make-shift arrangements as all the prime transportation and sanitation projects seem to have begun in one go. Flyovers, trunk drains, interchanges and other related civil works were all initiated without any reference to scientific programming.

Owing to political insecurity, the city nazim announced the launch of high spending projects, assuming that the city shall be able to brave out inconvenience.s Little did he know that the limited capacity of contractors, inherent process jams in approvals and release of funds as well as delays would turn the city into an inconceivable nightmare. The rains further compounded the problems.

One is not sure whether the quality of construction would remain as specified, given the endless spot damages caused to the various components of projects. Loosening of earth, inappropriate concrete applications, poor quality of masonry works and stagnant water in vital spaces are common sights.

In addition, the emergency relief was non-existent. Possibility of local/neighbourhood or even town-based relief work also did not exist. Similarly inter-agency coordination was lacking, eventually evolving into an ugly blame game. One agency was blaming the other for diverting stagnant rain and sewerage water to the jurisdiction of the other. Needless to say that the infrastructure is the common property of the city and its custodian agencies, and each one has a collective responsibility to safeguard and manage it in the larger interest of the people.

Several important steps need to be taken in this respect. The first step is to create a viable institutional set-up to address the issues on a long-term basis. An administratively potent and professionally capable planning agency need to be created within the framework of CDGK. This agency must be allowed to independently plan and guide the development process, including infrastructure development. Even federal and military based urban projects should be scrutinised by this agency.

It may be noted that the existing provision of Master Plan Groups of Offices (MPGO) in the city is not in a position to tackle these spread out responsibilities. The next step is to re-examine the process of design and execution. A revised set of project guidelines must be prepared for making the planning, design execution and operation works compatible to strict standards of quality and performance. The design merit should not be compromised at any cost.

And finally, the infrastructure planning must be undertaken in a coordinated manner. With the recent promulgation of the Access to Information Ordinance 2006 by the governor of Sindh, the task has become achievable, provided the will is there.

One has termed this formula 'National Deal for Reconciliation and Harmony'. It is conceived to be a win-win scenario for all contenders, most of all the citizens and civilians; and is supposed to begin from September 10, when Nawaz Sharif and his younger bother Shahbaz Sharif are due to land in Islamabad. It offers a plan of complete transition from a military-dominated state, democracy and governance to a civilian-led dispensation by April 2008.

This formula is developed keeping in view the big global and domestic political picture that Pakistan is a part of. It is cognizant of various internal rigidities, compulsions and divides. The formula focusses on the common ground approach.

However, it is pertinent and relevant to spell out the assumptions that influence the articulation of this formula. The single major assumption is that General Musharraf, and his allies, are willing to take a giant step back for a quantum leap forward, in the true 'national interest'. One minor assumption is that General Musharraf actually means when he often says: "Sab say pehlay Pakistan!"

The conceptual premise of this article, and the proposed national deal, is rooted in the ageless Asian wisdom reflected in: "Don't fight fire with fire; find water!" (Lord Buddha); and "When flood has approached your house, open the doors and save the house!" (Chinese proverb).

The formula addresses seven major, short-term issues, and a set of as many interwoven, long-term, issues. Following are the details -- possible ways of addressing these issues  -- of this formula:

 

Short-Term Issues

Return of exiled leaders

As a first step towards national harmony, consider offering a general in scope but limited in time clemency, effective between September 2007 and April 2008, primarily from arrests but also from any other explicit or implicit form of prosecution or coercion, to all those who were accused of financial and/or executive wrongdoings while holding elected public offices between 1975 and 2005. This will also cover any action against you, at least for the time being, under Article 6 (high treason) of the 1973 Constitution.

 

Fate of present assemblies

Let the present assemblies, for a change and for the sake of a unique record in the last 60 years, complete their term. Instead of dissolving them, let the parliamentarians go home with some dignity in mid-November 2007.

 

Setting up of a caretaker government

If you facilitate a truly representative and neutral caretaker government, comprising conscientious people, you and your allies will get a lot of mileage and political boost. This single act will positively influence the process and outcome of several other steps proposed here.

 

The issue of uniform

Announce your intention to retire as the army chief, as part of this proposed national deal, in September 2007; nominate your successor; and choose strategically (or intuitively!) a suitable date for hanging the boots. It would add to your credibility by leaps and bounds if the actual retirement coincides with or, preferably, precedes the setting up of the caretaker government.

 

Free and fair elections

You can win hearts and minds if you could somehow manage free, fair and credible elections -- the mother of all issues. This will primarily require two key steps. One, nominating an independent (and credible) Election Commission, if possible, from a panel nominated by the opposition; and two, holding both the national and provincial elections on the same day with due role of advanced technology for casting, counting and preventing fake votes. A good, affordable and replicable example is the use of simple, push button gadgets used in last Indian elections. One proposes that the elections should be held in early February 2008, which will be within 90 days of the setting up of the caretaker government as per this plan.

 

Election for a public office in uniform

This is the only area that will require an ordinance or a constitutional amendment, offering a universal allowance to all those who retire from the peak of a service (any state service: military, bureaucracy, judiciary, etc) or seek voluntary retirement to take part in public or political life after 12 weeks. Since the spirit and intention behind this proposed step are both universal and inclusive, it is is not likely to be challenged in the Supreme Court.

 

Restoration of the 1973 Constitution

This issue is obviously tricky, but it can be dealt with if the 1973 Constitution is restored in its original shape and made effective from April 2008. Alternatively, it can also be dealt along with the complex, long-term set of issues. In case we opt for the first choice, the proposed elections in February 2008 should be held under the 1973 constitution and for a constituent assembly. The thinking behind this radical suggestion is that a) the 1973 constitution has been so bruised and battered by amendments, violations and outright disrespect that we need a new constitution; and b) since the issue of balance of power (between the president and the parliament) has become so heated, it would make sense to involve people and let the elected representatives decide whether they want to invoke the 1973 Constitution -- with one meta, purgatory amendment --or frame a new constitution.

 

Long-Term Issues

It is proposed that a truly representative Pakistan Forum be set up to advise on all these issues, including an even-handed plan to prosecute the accused (who are being given limited clemency from September 2007 to April 2008) by a single forum. Let us consider that the consensus recommendations of the Forum will be binding on you, Mr president, as well as the government that follows after the elections.

The Pakistan Forum will have to be a nationally representative body of major and minor political and other interests. It is proposed that the Forum should include all parliamentary leaders in the National Assembly; elected representatives of lawyers, businessperons and the media (both journalists and editors/owners); minority leaders; and civil society representatives. It should also include two retired army chiefs (from those who showed respect for democratic governments like General Jehangir Karamat and General Waheed Kakar) and two retired judges of good repute (for instance, Justice Saeeduzzaman Siddiqui, Justice Fakhruddin G Ibrahim and Justice Tariq Mahmood).

Since the Forum will be mandated to advise you also, therefore you should not become its part. It would not include the three leaders who had been abroad for quite some time -- Nawaz Sharif; Benazir Bhutto and Altaf Hussain -- because they have stakes in the outcome of this Forum's working. But, like other free citizens, they would be indirectly taking part through their representatives in the National Assembly.

To sum up, one would say that this National Deal for Reconciliation and Harmony, while balancing the popular and the political in the public interest, would save you from entering into 'deal' with any contender from apparent position of perceived vulnerability.

Besides, it would demonstrate your selfless gesture of providing level playing field to all contenders; would save you from consolidating multiple divides in Pakistan; and would also take many a pressure from you as the Pakistan Forum could act as a bulwark while taking care of, in particular, international pressures on the one hand and the domestic insurgency on the other. One sure outcome of this formula is your augmented stature as a statesman, as we believe that your are aware of its value and it matters to you.

 

Re-election as the president

After taking all the above steps, one does not think you would have any close contenders to be elected as the president of Pakistan. Let the new assemblies elect you, under revised rules of the new or amended constitution. To conclude, one would stress that it is about time to choose between a potential salute, in case of a selfless approach, and drumming out by the nation.

The writer, a former civil servant, is presently a freelance social development consultant based in Islamabad. Email: civiljunction@gmail.com

Iqra was too young to even properly say 'Abai' (mom) and 'Baba' (dad) when her father agreed to give her in 'Swara'. The three-year-old girl is the daughter of Pervez Khan, a resident of Jaffarabad in Lower Dir, NWFP. She was set to be shifted to her in-laws' house on August 31, but was stopped thanks to the media and subsequent action by the police.

'Swara', a cruel custom of giving women to rivals for resolving a dispute, is in vogue in all the provinces of Pakistan. It is known as 'Sang Chatti' in Sindh, 'Vinni' in Punjab and 'Arjani' in Balochistan. The victims of 'Swara' are often made to pay for the wrongdoings of their male relatives. Iqra was also made to pay for her father's illicit relations with a woman.

It is unfortunate that every Malik, Chaudhry, Sardar, Wadera and Khan can hold a jirga in Pakistan, and can impose a decision of his choice on innocent people with impunity, even if it conflicts with the law of the land. Countless lives have been destroyed because of this, but the perpetrators mostly go scot-free. Pervez Khan, a labourer in Kharian, Punjab, developed business rivalry with some Afghans. The Afghans -- Haji Yasin, Inzar Gul, Allah Noor and Qayyum -- accused Pervez of having illicit relations with the wife of their business partner, Fazl Subhan, a Pakistani.

The Afghans received Rs 62,000 from Pervez to put the matter under the carpet, but later they changed their mind and said that Subhan had not been properly compensated. Subsequently, the four-member Afghan jirga 'decided' that the three-year-old Iqra would be 'married' to seven-year-old Imran, son of Fazl Subhan, to resolve the dispute.

Pervez had no option but to agree. JUI-F District Naib Amir Maulana Gul Rahim alias Darbar Maulvi performed the nikkah on January 10, 2007, and August 31 was set as the date for Iqra's rukhsti. However, Pervez later changed his mind and sought the media's help by bringing the minor girl to the Chakdara Press Club.

The story was widely published in the press."The Afghan refugees forced me at the gunpoint to give Iqra to Subhan's son. It was done to punish me for a business rivalry," he claimed. "This is a condemnable act to give a three-year-old child in Swara," SPARC's Manager Law Ijaz reacted. The police took timely action and arrested seven people -- Ghulam Muhammad, Muhammad Gul, Gul Khan, Pervez Khan (Iqra's father), Lal Zada, Amir Nawaz and Sultan Yousaf. The Ouch Police Station first confirmed to TNS that Subhan had been arrested, but later denied it. The Lower Dir Sessions Court ordered the registration of FIR against 18 people involved in performing the matrimonial rituals. Finally, the marriage was stopped and police took custody of Iqra on court orders.

Majority of the victims of this barbaric practice across the country are minor girls. In June last year, a two-month-old baby girl fell prey to Swara in Buner, NWFP. It was reported in June this year that two girls, aged five and seven, had been given in Swara to their family rivals to end a land dispute at Hatan Dara in Upper Dir. One of them, Fehmeeda, was recovered on court orders from her 'in-laws' house after two years.

The court ordered the registration of FIR against 19 people under section 310-A of Pakistan Penal Code (PPC), inserted in the PPC through the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 2005, which suggests up to 10 years imprisonment for handing over girls to rivals. However, the accused in these cases were acquitted by the Peshawar High Court on the basis that the law did not extend to the Provincially and Federally Administered Tribal Areas (PATA and FATA).

This barrier came as a blow to the efforts aimed at discouraging the menace of Swara. The legal experts say that the laws prevalent in the rest of the country are not applicable in FATA and PATA under Article 247 of the Constitution, unless the president and the governor extend them to these areas through notifications.

The accused in Iqra case may also go unpunished due to legal compulsions. This social menace needs to be checked with an iron hand and the laws in this respect should be promulgated in all parts of the country, so that education and better future is ensured to the minor girls. "We will launch a campaign for extension of anti-Swara law to the PATA and FATA," Ijaz vowed. These cases necessitate the immediate extension of the above-mentioned law to the PATA and FATA, so that the practice of Swara is legally checked in these conservative societies.

It is, however, encouraging that a seven-member bench of the Supreme Court headed by Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry has declared all Swara, Vinni and Sang Chatti marriages null and void, and ordered district police officers (DPOs) across the country to prevent such marriages in future. 




For whom the bell tolls
Shakeel Pathan raided the private jails in Sindh and daringly rescued bonded labourers

By Shahid Husain

Human rights have become a 'flavour-of-the-month' term in contemporary politics and even dictatorial regimes try to give the impression that they respect them. However, it is difficult to find people in Pakistan who have actually waged struggle for human rights and have suffered as a result.

Shakeel Pathan, who passed away on September 24, 1998, was one such courageous person -- he raided the notorious private jails of feudal lords in Sindh and got bonded labourers freed from their clutches.

Born on April 1, 1956, in Hyderabad, Shakeel did his Master's in Political Science from the University of Sindh. The environment at that time was politically charged, with students actively participating in the movement for the restoration of democracy.

Shakeel joined the left-wing National Students Federation (NSF) and soon became the president of its Sindh chapter. "He started working actively against the class system as a young student and later helped make bonded labour in Pakistan an international issue," recalls Jan-e-Alam, a Pakistan People's Party (PPP) leader and a former NSF activist. "In 1978, when the journalist community waged a struggle for the implementation of Wage Board Award under the leadership of Minhaj Barna, Shakeel #went to jail for the cause of journalists. He was with me in the Central Prison, Karachi. We observed a 21-day hunger strike against the excesses of jail authorities and Shakeel had to be hospitalised," Alam says.

"I was forced to leave the country in 1981, when a PIA plane was hijacked and the hijackers demanded the release of many political prisoners. When I came back to Pakistan after several years, Shakeel was still struggling for human rights," he adds. "He did not succumb to pressure even after being hit by paralysis, and continued his struggle for the rights of peasants and labourers," Alam lauds.

Sohail Sangi, a senior journalist and a former leader of the Communist Party of Pakistan, recalls Shakeel with fondness, love and respect. "I was a member of the Sindh National Students' Federation (SNSF) that had pro-Moscow leanings, whereas Shakeel was an active member of the NSF (Rashid Group) that had Maoist leanings. We differed ideologically, but I can say with certainty that he was a shining star of the Left movement. It was not a joke to raid private jails in Sindh where peasants were kept bonded," he says.

Even before the establishment of Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP), Shakeel was actively fighting for prisoners' rights and formed a committee for that cause. "He also tried his level best to provide solace to the families of the martyrs of the Movement for the Restoration of Democracy (MRD) during the era of General Ziaul Haq," Sangi informs.

Mahmood-ul-Hasan, another former leader of the NSF, says: "Shakeel was committed to the cause of working people, and even imprisonment and disease could not deter him." Shakeel was one of the founding members of the HRCP in 1986. He also worked as coordinator of its Special Task Force for Sindh from 1991 till his death in an accident in 1998, when he was going to Umerkot, Tharparkar, with a team to free bonded labourers.

Shakeel was a part of many fact-finding missions in Sindh, including those relating to abuse of human rights, torture against women and children, custodial deaths, child labour, bonded labour, karo kari, and violence against minorities. It was Shakeel who raided the dungeon of a feudal lord in Sindh along with a team of Anti-Slavery International, a foreign non-governmental organisation, and freed 71 bonded labourers in 1996.

The famous Manu Bheel was not present at the camp at that time, but when he returned he was severely tortured by the feudal lord who suspected that the raid had been conducted at his behest. If we today find Manu Bheel staging a symbolic hunger strike from 9:00 am to 2:00 pm daily in front of the Hyderabad Press Club, the credit goes to Shakeel who gave an impoverished farmer of Tharparkar the will to fight against atrocities.

Though the bonded labour system was formally abolished in 1992 during Nawaz Sharif's first tenure as the prime minister, it continues to be practiced in Sindh and Punjab even today. 'Analysis of Interventions in Bonded Labour in Pakistan,' a study conducted in 2003 by the Pakistan Institute of Labour Education and Research (PILER), an NGO, explicitly says: "Though different NGOs claim that about 30,000 bonded labours have been released in the country during the last one decade, the PILER research team has been able to account for only 8,530 people confirmed released at this moment."

The study further says: "The effectiveness of state intervention can be gauged from the fact that in 12 years since the law was enacted in 1992, a total of 23 cases were detected under Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act and the fine collected during that period was Rs 6,100 only."

Despite the fact that tens of thousands of bonded labourers are still languishing in private jails in the country, there is a silver lining because the Supreme Court has taken a suo moto notice of the plight of Mano Bheel and has ordered top police officials to take steps to recover his family members. The credit goes to courageous people like Shakeel who not only raised consciousness level of bonded labourers, but also acted daringly to free them.

Shakeel also received a special award, conferred by the Lawyers for Human Rights and Legal Aid (LHRLA), in June 1994 for his contribution to the cause of human rights. He was also awarded by the Council of Pakistan Affairs in 1998 posthumously. Also, he was given an award by Shehri Action Committee, Hyderabad, the same year. His wife Nasreen Shakeel continues to carry forward his mission with great zeal, while his son Adeel Pathan is a journalist known for espousing the cause of human rights.

Home|Daily Jang|The News|Sales & Advt|Contact Us|

ACK ISSUES