The Viewer's
Forum is a platform where you can share your views with others on
any particular current issue.
Please Note - The views in this forum are from the contributors'
perspectives.
Now
that Pakistan's CE, General Pervez Musharraf has accepted the
invitation of the Indian PM, Mr. Atal Behari Vajpayee, what do
you think should be the agenda of the meeting to ensure lasting
peace in the region?
Please
send your opinions at
vf@jang.com.pk
Your
Opinion
- The central aim of the
agenda should be peace and progress between the two
countries. Pakistan must respect the 'accession of Jammu
& Kashmir' to India, which took place legally and was
accepted by all. All these years, Pakistan had been the
oppressor and India the
oppressed. Pakistan must realize the fact that all the
wars initiated by them brought only misery to themselves.
Apart from losing all the wars with India, they even lost
their East Pakistan. For achieving peace, Pakistan must
cooperate with India instead of resorting to their
regular hate-India attitude since the last 53 years.
GIRI RAJU,
Chennai, India
- The coming talks between
India and Pakistan must be seen in the global
perspective. Kashmir is no longer a bilateral dispute.
Let us see the facts related to it today:
India cant afford to leave Kashmir, as that will
tempt many other nationalities in India to seek the same
end.
People of Kashmir are not with India.
Pakistan cant afford to give up the State, from
where the originating rivers are keeping Pakistan green.
China wants peace on its frontier, but sure hates to have
the US sitting there in any form.
USA wants to derive advantage from both India and
Pakistan, and wants a share in Kashmir for its own
geo-strategic requirements.
- The coming talks are not
because India is sincere in solving the issue, or,
because Pakistan has been "willing to talk anywhere
any time" with India, to discuss and solve the "core
issue of Kashmir". It is because the US has been
active behind the scenes and has forced both India and
Pakistan to meet and talk.
The main US interest in this region is to contain China
and towards this end, has engineered the forthcoming
talks. Be that as it may, the Pakistani negotiators
should keep the interests of the country and the Kashmiri
people in view while talking to India.
Habib Siddiqui
Karachi
- I feel very uncomfortable
with General Musharrafs acceptance of
Vajpayees invitation. However, since the General
has shown his desire to visit New Delhi, Islamabad must
take into account the sacrifices of the Kashmiris, the
Pakistan armed forces the Pakistani people including the
daring Mujahideen groups.
The geo-strategic picture in and around South Asia has
become volatile and extremely unpredictable. New
alliances and the strategic partnership between the only
super power, USA, its NATO allies and the likes of
Israel, India, Russia and Iran including the former
Central Asian States indicates that the US would like to
buy more time for India through these meaningless parleys
between Musharraf and Vajpayee.
In order to be
proven diplomatically and politically correct, Musharraf
should use his own judgement based on the ground
realities of the brutal and inhuman atrocities that had
been committed by the Indian occupational forces in
Kashmir and its non-compliance with the UNSC resolutions.
UMAR KHAN DAWAR
Canada
- The core issue is
"Jammu and Kashmir" and lasting peace can be
achieved once this issue is resolved.
The issues which our Indian participants are mentioning
are less important. If "Jammu and Kashmir" were
not the main issue then Pakistani's would like to know
the absence of "Madhuri Dixit" from Indian
commercial movie screen.
Shahzad Alam
Frankfurt-Germany
- General Musharraf should
first ask for a plebiscite in Kashmir as agreed upon in
the UN Security Council to enable the people of Kashmir
to decide their own future. All other disputed matters
should be linked with the settlement of the Kashmir
Issue.
Mohammad Manzar Husain
Florida-USA
- There is a flurry of Op-ed
pages in free press of Pakistan suggesting agenda for the
meeting between CE Musharraf and Vajpayee. Most
ex-officials who write such opinions return to what was
said and done in the past, starting with the Simla
Agreement or the UN resolutions while forgetting that
times have changed and the world has moved on. Most
forget that clear choices are between a road to
reconciliation or continued confrontation. The new world
is dominated by the powerful forces of globalization,
economic interdependence and trends in conflict
resolution.
Fresh thinking requires for a win-win agenda to get away
from contentious issues both parties have failed to
resolve over 54 years. Diplomacy is an art of the
possible. We can learn from USA-China (1970s) relations
and France-Germany relations (after W.W.II). Germany and
France stand out as the best example of how economic
forces and cooperative security transform hostility into
partnership. A peacefully negotiated resolution of a
recent spy-plane incident showed that the USA-China
working relationship based on economic interdependency
instead of the contentious issues paid a handsome
dividend. These are two good models worth considering for
the talks between two elephants of the subcontinent.
Failure precipitates when fantasy meets reality. Just
because Kashmir or other lands are on our wish list
doesn't mean that other party is going to capitulate at
the negotiating table and hand over what we desire.
Anyone who believes in such delusions lives in a
fools paradise. Right or wrong, both countries have
invested heavily in parts of Kashmir they control and
political realities dictate that negotiators would be
committing suicide if
they agreed to part with the area under their respective
control.
Success results when skills match opportunities. There
are plenty of opportunities on both side of the LoC to
capitalize on. Reasons to consider include strategic and
economic. Uncertainty of outcome of any military
confrontation, nuclear or conventional, sustainable
defense, grinding poverty, deteriorating social
indicators and the need for decent living are
finding articulate voices among sane elements of both
countries.
Based on such considerations I think a win-win agenda for
the meeting should
cover the following elements:
1. Competition: yes, hate: no.
2. Self-reliance: yes, outside mediation: no.
3. Excellence: yes, mediocrity: no.
4. Collective wisdom: yes, dubious UN-type
multilateralism: no.
5. Strength: yes, weaknesses as in inept politics: no.
6. High road of peace: yes, instigated false Jihad: no
7. Equilibrium through inner strength (superior
knowledge, quality
scholarship, research, excellence in arts, technological
skills, agriculture
and above all youth with marketable skills needed to
generate wealth): yes,
dogma based politics (sectarian and ethnic cleansing):
no.
There is still hope for miracles, yes!
Kishan Bhatia
USA
- General Musharraf should
ask India to keep away from Kashmir and India should hold
a plebiscite immediately in the disputed region.
Impartial international observers should be invited for
the event. The Kashmiris should be given the option to
choose between staying with India or becoming an
independent nation.
Bill Butterworth
London
- Kashmir
Proportional reduction in defence budgets.
Trade
Sarfraz Khan
The Netherlands
- Amongst other things, I
would like the two Governments to discuss the option of
extending "priority" business visas and tourist
visas to the Pakistani and Indian nationals based in the
AGCC countries.
This region is the only region outside India/Pakistan
where the Hindus and Muslims work and live together (in
such a large number) and still behave themselves. And
definitely there are many instances where casual
friendships have developed into deeper bonds.
Till date priority visa policy of both the countries has
been India and Pakistan specific.
Syed Asad Ali
Oman
- The agenda for discussion
should be:
a) First priority should be Kashmir, i.e. return of POK
(Pakistan-Occupied-Kashmir) to India.
b) Nuclear non-proliferation.
c) Stopping cross-border terrorism.
d) Increase in trade.
e) Violation of the rights of minorities in Pakistan.
f) Resumption of cricket matches.
Somraj
India
- To achieve peace and
prosperity in the region there is only one option and
that is to resolve all conflicts and to drop hostile
intensions. When we look at our 50-odd years of history,
we find that each and every time we had a war, India was
an oppressor and this perspective has been acknowledged
by the International media. Each and every time the issue
was Kashmir.
In the light of the above mentioned facts we can
confidently state that the core issue of Kashmir should
be resolved swiftly and justly according to the rulings
of the United Nations and India should honour it, not
because they are being pressurized by the International
Community, but because the situation has changed
dramatically as both the nations have nuclear arsenals
and their missile programs are underway. Due to these
huge defence spendings, the IMF and World Bank are
monopolizing both countries. Poverty is at alarming
levels. The security spendings of India in Occupied
Kashmir can lead them to bankruptcy as was observed
during the Kargil scenario. Had the Mujahideen not
withdrawn, India would have gone bankrupt as it would
have had to make some 70,000 sorties of supplies to its
forces like in the Siachen Glacier operations. Therefore
we can conclude that in a decade or two, India would have
reached the same stage as the USSR had and which broke it
into a number of states.
My suggestion to Mr. Atal Behari is that he should take
time during his bed-rest at hospital and come up with the
right decision for a lasting peace and prosperity for the
people on both sides of the border.
Mohammad Jawad Alam
Pakistan
- The agenda of the
Vajpayee-Musharraf meeting must only be free and fare
plebiscite on Kashmir. Only then can the Kashmir issue be
resolved. The Indian government must accept the verdict
of the Kashmiris afterward.
Liaquat Ali Khan
India
- Here is what I would
consider to set a win-win agenda for the planned meeting
between CE Musharraf and PM Vajpayee.
1. Let's not kid ourselves by insisting that unless the
Kashmir problem is resolved there can be no progress in
improving bilateral relations.
2. Let's accept that the average Reshma and Rahim on both
sides of the LoC are poor and more concerned about 'Roti,
Kapada, Aur Makan' than forcing their religious beliefs
on others.
3. Let's accept the fact that even after fourteen
centuries of trying, five of every six persons in the
world follow beliefs other than Islam of any sect.
4. Let's accept realities and work on an agenda that
emphasizes on building a complex
economic interrelationship to generate wealth using
knowledge workers with marketable skills.
5. Let's work to build bridges to defuse hate and enhance
opportunities so that cheaper goods available across the
LoC reach consumers through the shortest route instead of
being routed through the Middle-East or Singapore as is
currently being done using parallel economy.
6. Let's foster good neighborly relations by sharing
natural resources at international prices to minimize
hardships across the LoC.
7. Let's remove restrictions on the flow of visitors
across the LoC so that favorable conditions to build
trust at a personal level between the average Reshma and
Rahim on both sides could be established.
8. Let's get used to earning instead of demanding respect
for each others beliefs.
9. Let there be pronouncements of cooperation and a
vision for the growth for the poor on both sides of the
LoC.
Kishan Bhatia
USA
Send this page to a friend!
The News International
Pakistan