Editorial
Four years
white, black and grey

Journalism is generally about the here and now. Follow-ups are its Achilles’ heel. Four years into power and having just been through a phase where elections looked round the corner, a performance evaluation of the current federal government is in order.

white
4 years in power
Sheer resilience

This gives a sense of the political history of the country where a mere completion of four years in power is celebrated as an achievement of a government. The resilience of the government is indeed outstanding considering the objective realities.

black
Blasphemy laws

It’s blasphemous

In January last year, Salmaan Taseer was assassinated by his bodyguard for supporting Christian woman Asiya Bibi who was accused of blasphemy; two months later, in March, minorities minister Shahbaz Bhatti was shot dead by gunmen who ambushed his car in broad daylight; five months on, in August, young factory worker Najeeb Zafar was killed for allegedly desecrating Quranic verses when he removed a calendar from the wall. Astonishingly, the perpetrators of violence have not been charged, tried or punished.

 

 


 


Editorial
Four years
white, black and grey

Journalism is generally about the here and now. Follow-ups are its Achilles’ heel. Four years into power and having just been through a phase where elections looked round the corner, a performance evaluation of the current federal government is in order.

What is being presented on the media is one point of view by one side; the government does not tire of counting its achievements and the opponents keep listing its failings. The truth lies somewhere in between. We understand, there   was the genuine limitation of taking charge under very critical circumstances. To its credit, those at the helm    of the government   turned its weaknesses into its strengths and survived four years in office.

The next four years weren’t easy. From suicide attacks to floods to power shortages to military operations to an activist judiciary were challenges that many thought would undo the democratic experiment. But today after the successful conclusion of the Senate elections, we mark the sheer resilience of this government.

But four years is also a long enough time for the government to have put in place the right structures. For journalists, it is  the right time to make a list of failures along with successes. About some things we at TNS weren’t so sure and so we decided to put them in a third list — the grey matters.

Objectivity is a difficult exercise; easier said than done. We are sure people on both sides of the fence will have problem with the distinctions as we have drawn them. Honestly, some realities are fluid. Energy that looked like a grey area to us last week is now a perfect black, considering the protests across the country over the unscheduled loadshedding etc.

So the lists may look arbitrary but we have tried to cover all the major issues confronting the country and how they have been dealt with by the present government.

 

 

white
4 years in power
Sheer resilience

This gives a sense of the political history of the country where a mere completion of four years in power is celebrated as an achievement of a government. The resilience of the government is indeed outstanding considering the objective realities.

Just to refresh the memory, in March 2008, when the current political dispensation was put in place after the February election, the country had survived a massive earthquake in 2005, was under the grip of suicide attacks by militants especially in Punjab and KPK, and had just seen the violent assassination of its most able leader.

The weak leaderless players were successful in putting together the strongest coalition in the following four years that were defined by military operations, floods of the worst kind, an anatagonist judiciary and the almost weekly deadlines given by the media about government’s ouster. The last one year has been especially uncertain — Osama bin Laden’s discovery in an Abbottabad compound was bound to end in Memogate; as for the Senate elections, it looked like they’ll never take place.

Little wonder, the PM takes pride in declaring every now and then he is the longest serving prime minister in this country’s history. In standing up to the army, he has managed to raise his stature too.

All said and done, the appointment of leader of the opposition as chairman Public Accounts Committee, as per the Charter of Democracy, should be counted among the successes of this government. For a good three years of its tenure, the leader of the opposition Ch. Nisar Ali Khan presided over the committee and to everyone’s satisfaction.

Towards the end of last year, in November to be precise, Ch. Nisar resigned from his position over some flimsy charges on the appointment of the new auditor general. His response was more in line with that of the chief justice of Pakistan who wrote a letter charge-sheeting the AG on seven grounds. Analysts argued the charges had no legal basis and the CJ subsequently accepted his appointment; but not Ch. Nisar who wouldn’t budge.

According to reports, the government has requested the Leader of the Opposition to retake the chairmanship of the committee. In the analysis, the government won on this.

Electoral reforms
Steps in the right direction

The present government has empowered the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) to a greater extent. In the 18th amendment, the authority to appoint chief election commissioner has been transferred to a parliamentary committee with equal representation both from government and opposition. Before, it used to be the discretion of the president.

The method is the same for members of ECP. Their tenure has been increased from three to five years. After the 20thamendment, the ECP will have a greater role in appointing interim governments at federal as well as provincial levels if the government and opposition fail to develop a consensus.

The computerised voters’ lists are another success. The government has provided technical and financial support to ECP to introduce a database of voters which would automatically be updated with the help of NADRA. The ECP has prepared a five year strategic plan 2010-2014 to reform the institution. A major achievement would be the establishment of a political finance wing to scrutinise the financial statement and assets of parliamentarians. All steps in the right direction.

 

With this government in power, electronic TV channels have persisted at full throttle and the print media has closely followed behind, however, a little meekly. Some serious faux pas aside — too many spokespersons and too many diverging party views on talk shows every evening — and too many quick changes in information ministers, from media’s darling Sherry Rehman to Kaira to Ashiq, the government has nevertheless managed this medium of information well. It has faced the storm steadfastly — remember Zardari’s unexpected visit to Dubai late last year for reasons of ill health. It did nothing to threaten the freedom of expression and did not pave way for gagging it.

It has sat back and allowed the TV hosts and their guests to vilify the party, the president and its elected parliamentarians all the way.

Institutional framework
Legislative revolution

On account of legislation, the performance of the parliament has been pretty impressive. During the last four years, it unanimously amended the Constitution three times. Out of these, the historic 18th amendment could be described as a Legislative Revolution. It aspires to convert Pakistani experience of coercive federation into a cooperative federalism. The 20th amendment stirs hope that in future there will be free and fair elections.

The parliament also created history as couple of women parliamentarians successfully piloted their pro-women Private Members’ Bills. In the Senate, a labour-friendly Private Members’ Bills has been passed. These are positive developments in a country where the tradition of passing such Bills is rare.

Analysts often examine the performance of the parliament only in quantitative terms. Figures on this yardstick are impressive. During the last four years, the parliament passed 65 Acts, the National Assembly passed 96 Bills, and 147 Private Members’ Bills were introduced in the Assembly. The Senate performed equally well and passed 80 Bills. Ninety one ordinances including 30 plus of General Musharraf were laid before the Parliament after a court verdict against the emergency of 2007.

In qualitative terms, the Parliament adopted many pro-women laws to check harassment at work place, against domestic violence, against acid throwing, and on National Commission on the Status of Women.

Labour-friendly laws to reinstate sacked employees and restore trade unions are worth mentioning.

Other significant pieces of legislation include: new statistics law and law to establish a National Commission on Human Rights. However it failed to enact the National Accountability law that is pending since 2010.

On occasions, Pakistan appears to be an over-legislated country. We need to functionalise this reformed framework. Time has come to evolve mechanisms to transform ‘the statutory’ into ‘societal’ so that the people are able to feel the difference.

 

The federal cabinet’s approval to phase out the negative list of tradable commodities between Pakistan and India and grant MFN status to India by December is no small achievement. The issue had been pending since 1996 when India granted the same status to Pakistan.

Besides, the government is constantly pressurising India to give easy access to Pakistani products and remove non-tariff barriers.

Formal trade between India and Pakistan rose to $2.7billion in 2010-11 from $144million in 2001, while informal trade including third country trade is estimated at $10billion. Both governments expect increase in revenue if informal trade is normalised.

Another plus is that the government has adopted a cautious approach. It did not award the status right away and prescribed a timeframe. Stakeholders are constantly identifying problem areas, especially the industries that feel threatened if cheap Indian goods are allowed to flood Pakistani markets. The government intends to take safeguard measures under WTO regime to protect such industries till the time they become competitive.

The government tactfully countered the propaganda of interest groups like local manufacturers and Difa-e-Pakistan Council which was formed overnight. Apparently it did not have to face opposition from the armed forces.

NFC and CCI
Moving towards solutions

National Finance Commission (NFC) Award, as per the 1973 constitution, design the formula of resource-sharing among different federating units. This has not happened for most parts of our history. The fifth NFC Award in 1997 was controversial as the federal government allocated higher shares of all taxes to itself. General Musharraf tried his level best during his regime to bring about a consensus among provincial governments and federal government on NFC Award but failed and issued a presidential distribution order in 2006.

In 2010, the present government successfully concluded with consensus the seventh NFC Award which itself is a huge achievement. It is for the first time that the distribution of resources among provinces is based not only on population but also on other factors like inverse population density, backwardness and revenue collection/collection. The share of provinces has increased from 47.5 percent to 57.5 percent in the Federal Divisible Pool which is a major shift in vertical revenue sharing.

This award, for the first time, has helped find solutions of issues like Gas Development Surcharge (GDS) and Hydroelectricity profit.

The role of the Council of Common Interests (CCI) has also been enhanced and made provincial autonomy-oriented after the 18th amendment. It is an inter-provincial coordination committee which is responsible for mega projects, cross provincial matters such as water disputes between provinces as well as matters that require constitutional change.

Past governments had curtailed its role to an extent that from 1971 to 2008 only two meetings of CCI were held but under this government it has been holding meeting regularly. It has become a major forum for resolution of differences of provinces on different issues.

 

Of the few foreign policy initiatives taken by this government, reviving good relations with Iran has managed to survive (it may have been sheer coincidence that President Zardari’s overtures to India culminated in Mumbai attacks in 2008). Iran as the cornerstone of our foreign policy has survived despite and not because of the uneasy relations with the US.

The business community sees great value in having good relations with all our neighbours including Iran. Of course there are occasional spoilers like the illegal border crossings and alleged presence of Jundullah, a terrorist organisation, on the Pakistan side of the border, but by and large, the atmospherics between us and Iran have remained cordial in the last four years.

The much-trumpeted gas pipeline from Iran to Pakistan and beyond has brought the two countries even closer. This has come about despite the adamant US pressure to shelf the project. Iran has also found a natural market for its product in the shape of its eastern neighbours. From Pakistan’s perspective, good relations with Iran also mean a chance to neutralise sectarianism.

No political prisoners
No jails for politicians

Some commitments of Charter of Democracy have been kept. The politics of revenge was laid to rest and, unlike the 1990s, the spirit of reconciliation has prevailed in the last four years. The government likes to claim credit for no political prisoner in these four years. It has every right to.

 

 

This is a tricky subject. We all need to ask ourselves: do we really feel secure now after spending almost a decade under the shadow of death and destruction caused by bombing and suicide blasts? What about last four years? Yes, people in Lahore and in other major cities feel more comfortable moving around as the frequency of terrorism-related incidents has waned to a good extent.

However, our countrymen in Peshawar may choose to disagree. They are still feeling the brunt as their city echoes with blasts. People in the tribal areas are equally vulnerable.

Though the cost was rather high, Pakistan has, eventually, been successful in containing militancy. The world is still far off from declaring a complete victory in the war against terror, but the gradual success against al Qaeda and Taliban militants keep alive the hope for a peaceful Pakistan.

This government inherited a mess that was not easy to clean in a short span of time. Nor are we hundred per cent secure. Still a long way to go.

BISP
Income or
lethargy

We have placed this programme in the list of grey areas while the government may tout this as one of its biggest successes. Direct cash transfer to the poorest of the poor has its merits. Others think it generates lethargy. So the opinion is divided. For those five million families with a monthly earning of less than six thousand rupees, one thousand rupees extra per month may be like windfall.

The beneficiaries and the government apart, the critics see the programme as “too little for too few, breeds dependency and has problems of corruption, over-centralisation, leakage and patronage”. They don’t buy the women empowerment argument either.

The improvements or restructuring suggested in the programme includes making it a conditional financial support — linking it with getting children enrolled in school, getting them vaccinated and women getting skills. The micro-credit has already been incorporated into the programme though some people believe it should be an only micro-credit facility.

 

Our forex reserves are up to $18.3 billion, our exports have crossed the $25 billion benchmark, and our per capita income has risen from $990 to $1152, claims government representative Fauzia Wahab without realising that the government has got very little to do with these indicators.

Forex reserves do increase with remittances which have increased due to global crackdown against unofficial funds transfer channels like hundi. Similarly, per capita income is an average and an inflated figure; it does not mean wealth is properly distributed among the people.

Anyhow, the government deserves credit for increased agricultural output that it has achieved despite the devastating floods for two consecutive years. The production of wheat is 25 million tonnes this year and the output in the cotton crop has shown an upward movement from 10 million bales to 14 million bales.

On the other hand, the list of failed initiatives is quite long. The production at factories came down because of chronic energy shortages, the local currency lost value against dollar and other currencies, the efforts to expand tax net have not yielded results, restructuring of loss making public enterprise is still a dream and mass unemployment a grave reality. For the layperson, economy would be counted as a grey area for this government.

Pak-China relations
Deeper than oceans  but twisted

For all the talk about looking eastwards and building new alliances, Pak-China relations will be counted among the grey areas for this government.

No complexities here. Pak-China relations falls within the foreign policy domain and the elected government has liked to steer clear of that department all along. Besides, foreign policy for Pakistan means security-driven relations (whoever gives us the weapons) and this is the reality of the ‘time-tested’ friendship with China.

“Pak-China friendship is higher than mountains, deeper than oceans, stronger than steel and sweeter than honey” followed by “‘your friends are our friends, your enemies are our enemies and your security is our security” — hyperboles like these have been uttered ad nauseum in the last four years as frequently as they have been since the 1960s.

In fact, the second quote — though a little twisted here — aptly sums up the relations. The actual quote that brought China into the equation was “the enemy of your enemy is your friend”. Pakistan is now trying to bolster its friendship with China in an environment where its relations with the US have deteriorated. Ironically, China today cannot risk annoying either the US or India. It will not tolerate any terrorism-related adventurism from our side. Higher than mountains indeed!

Devolution
Burden of
implementation

By devolution, we mean transfer of subjects like health, education, environment etc. from the centre to the provinces with the aim of promoting provincial autonomy. The move was given institutional cover under the 18th amendment that was passed unanimously.

Keeping in view the political history of the country, consensus-making on this issue was a feat worth celebrating. May be, for this very reason, all the 28 members who worked on the amendment were conferred with Nishan-e-Imtiaz.

On the flip side, the move has proved to have been made in haste and without proper homework. So far, the problems in implementation of the amendment outdo the benefits associated with it. The problems that have come to light so far include capacity of the officials in the provinces to handle these subjects, the distribution of assets, the absence of a central Drug Regulatory Authority etc. This should not have stopped the course of devolution. It’s only that transition could have been more smooth through proper deliberation and consultation.

The administrative, judicial and political reforms in the draconian Frontier Crimes Regulation (FCR) laws brought into effect in 2011 were considered a sterling achievement of this government. The inhuman clauses in civil and criminal matters were reformed and the FCR was made “responsive to human rights”. What was universally hailed was the extension of Political Parties Act to the tribal areas.

On paper, all this looked good. But there were caveats — pertaining largely to implementation. Soon there came a presidential ordinance called Action in Aid of Civil Power giving military unbridled powers to contain militancy. The conditions have not been conducive for political parties to conduct political activity in the area which alone is the solution of FATA’s multiple problems including development. People within FATA want an abolition of FCRs.

At the end of the day, the status of FATA is the bone of contention; it has to either merge with the KPK or exist as a separate province so that the reforms are meaningfully implemented.

 

 

 

 

black
Blasphemy laws
It’s blasphemous

In January last year, Salmaan Taseer was assassinated by his bodyguard for supporting Christian woman Asiya Bibi who was accused of blasphemy; two months later, in March, minorities minister Shahbaz Bhatti was shot dead by gunmen who ambushed his car in broad daylight; five months on, in August, young factory worker Najeeb Zafar was killed for allegedly desecrating Quranic verses when he removed a calendar from the wall. Astonishingly, the perpetrators of violence have not been charged, tried or punished.

The outrage generated on these and several other blasphemy cases is not forgotten. Yet, the government has shown no intent so far to amend the blasphemy laws (295-C), if not repeal the laws, or even to curb vigilantism. PPP MNA Sherry Rehman who was supposed to bring before the parliament the proposed changes to Blasphemy Laws was forced to go into hiding after the death of Salmaan Taseer. Meanwhile the government has decided to stay silent and Asiya Bibi languishes in jail.

Governance
Patronage or misgovernance

Governance is, in effect, everything a government does. Therefore to put governance in the list of failures would mean this government has simply failed. Period. But governance in our country has a peculiar context to it.

Political patronage, disregard of merit and, of course, corruption. This is how we generally describe the failure of governance and the political governments are known to have failed on these counts. Ironically, the panacea suggested in our context is autocracy or an ‘efficient’ military government. International players [for us the donors] have harped upon the idea of governance to the exclusion of democracy.

Like all previous political governments, this government too is faced with this charge — failed governance. The whispering campaign of corruption in the highest corridors begins in the capital and then trickles down. Absence of electricity, shortage of gas, kickbacks to the patwari and to lower officials in courts are all considered as governance failures.

Since there is no objective analysis of this government’s performance according to the Worldwide Governance Indicators that include six dimensions — voice and accountability, political stability and lack of violence, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, rule of law, control of corruption — we are more likely to conclude it as its failure for the simple reason it was not able to market its successes properly. Appointing an Intermediate-pass as the head of OGDC is a charge that the government will not find easy to defend, all political patronage notwithstanding.

 

Pakistan’s largest city and economic hub has become a permanent festering wound.

Ironically, all three major political parties of the city MQM, PPP and ANP are coalition partners of both Sindh and federal governments but still there is a war going on among different stakeholders to strengthen their hold on the city. Violence regularly comes to haunt the city in the shape of target killing, sectarianism, kidnapping and extortion.

As we write these lines, during the last two weeks more than 100 people have been killed in different parts of the city but no one has been arrested. The Interior minister Rehman Malik has been issuing warning to criminal elements every second day since the formation of the present government. Zulfiqar Mirza, ex-home minister of Sindh once claimed that he had all the evidences against the people responsible for violence in Karachi and also put blame on MQM during a press conference last year after resigning from his ministry. His opponents blamed him as the culprit.

Meanwhile, Karachi bleeds.

Pakistan’s largest city and economic hub has become a permanent festering wound.

Ironically, all three major political parties of the city MQM, PPP and ANP are coalition partners of both Sindh and federal governments but still there is a war going on among different stakeholders to strengthen their hold on the city. Violence regularly comes to haunt the city in the shape of target killing, sectarianism, kidnapping and extortion.

As we write these lines, during the last two weeks more than 100 people have been killed in different parts of the city but no one has been arrested. The Interior minister Rehman Malik has been issuing warning to criminal elements every second day since the formation of the present government. Zulfiqar Mirza, ex-home minister of Sindh once claimed that he had all the evidences against the people responsible for violence in Karachi and also put blame on MQM during a press conference last year after resigning from his ministry. His opponents blamed him as the culprit.

Meanwhile, Karachi bleeds.

The 18th Amendment incorporated Article 140-A to define democratic contours for future local government. It empowered each province to establish, by law, a local government system to devolve political, administrative and financial responsibility and authority to the elected representatives of the local governments. The Election Commission has been entrusted to conduct these elections.

If deciphered democratically ‘political’ and ‘elected’ representatives mean party-based elected local government; administrative implies ‘district cadre for services’; and financial means ‘fair resource allocation and revenue generation possibilities.’ Unlike the time-bound constitutional deadlines for the presidential, federal and provincial elections, the constitution is silent about any kind of deadline for the local elections.     

So far, none of the provinces has moved forward to offer vibrant local government to consumers of democracy and governance at grassroots. The constitutional article is also silent about any kind of local governance in the federal capital, Islamabad, Federally Administered tribal Areas (FATA) and Gilgit-Baltistan.

Local government system in the country has always been identified as a ‘legitimacy ladder’ for the military rulers and the political elite has always shied from establishing any kind of local government system. Net result is ruined grassroot governance. Political parties need to realise that they can accommodate thousands of their political workers as local proxies for the ruling elite and in future deprive the usurpers in uniform of abusing this window.

Quite ironically, on the very auspicious Pakistan Day this year, the country’s largest federating unit saw an ‘officially’-imposed communication blackout. While the government’s intention — to avert any untoward incident — might be sincere, its suspension of cellular network across the length and breadth of the province was enough proof of the state’s inability to handle the crisis that Balochistan has come to.

While the fact remains that Balochistan has ‘harboured’ nationalist/secessionist elements longer than the present democratically elected government has been in the assembly, and that the Centre has been meaning to help the situation — it announced the very well-worded Aghaze Haqooq e Balochistan Package in 2009 followed by the NFC Award — the promises remain unfulfilled to this day.

Where the government has outlined the problem areas, it has failed to identify the key players who could contribute to seeing the package through. Actually, the civilian government has no control over most matters when it comes to Balochistan, especially the missing persons.

It was first promised in the Charter of Democracy and then in PM Gilani’s speech to draft the Freedom of Information law within the first 100 days of government after due parliamentary debate. The 18th Amendment incorporated Article 19-A to acknowledge ‘Right to Information (RTI)’.

In practical terms, the government has yet to move an inch.

In 2008, the debate was confused by bringing the subject from the Cabinet Division to the Information Ministry. Now after the opinion of the Law Ministry it goes back to its original domain. As of today, neither the law has been improved nor has any other practical step been taken to realise this vital right for transparency in governance.

Since October 2011, the post of Federal Ombudsman, an appellate authority in the existing weak Access to Information Law, is lying vacant. For the last two years, the Right to Information has hardly figured even verbally in government priorities. The government genuinely deserves ‘National Lip-Service Award’ for this historic negligence.

Any kind of success is missing when it comes to the missing persons. New cases are emerging on a daily basis.

One of the major reasons of the deadlock on Balochistan is the missing persons’ issue. The nationalist parties of Balochistan claim that thousands of Balochi young people have been abducted by agencies on the pretext of being separatists. Now, the nationalist parties of Sindh are facing similar abductions.

In KPK and Punjab, the issues is mainly related to the war on terror and most of those disappeared are considered to have links with terrorist outfits.

The missing persons’ issue is only a reflection of the structural imbalance of the state itself and national ‘security’ and ‘interest’ is one area where the political government has not made inroads; the matter rests with the army and intelligence agencies.

The right to justice is being denied as mutilated bodies of many of these missing persons are found from roadsides etc. The present government has failed completely to rein intelligence agencies on the issue. It has also failed to bring the Pakistan Army Act of 1952 in the parliament leave alone amending it. It should at least bring it to pre-November 10, 2007 position when it was amended, giving wide-ranging powers to the armed forces to hold court martial of civilians on charges ranging from treason, sedition or attack on members of the armed forces.

Stories abound about violence against minorities: Take the May 2010 attack on the Ahmadi mosque in Lahore where scores of innocent people were killed or the Aug 2009 riots in Gojra, Punjab, where the members of the Christian community were attacked. These are perhaps the deadliest examples of persecution of minorities ever.

We know violence and persecution of minorities by the majority is on the rise. We are driving them away from our country. The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan report 2011 further affirms the point. It says the minorities in Pakistan are feeling even less secure than ever before. That’s a shameful reality.

Other than paying lip service to religious co-existence or belated announcements of compensation and half-hearted attempts at encouraging reconciliation, the government’s helplessness in extending support and protection to them is beyond disgraceful this past four years.

It’s time the PPP government does something for the cause of the minorities — as the first step at least revise the textbooks that foster religious extremism in schools.

The joint session of the Parliament is locked in a fresh debate to decide an old issue — redefining relations with the US.

The Raymond Davis episode, the killing of Osama bin Laden in Abbottabad and the Salala checkpoint tragedy (all developments of 2011) have brought the Pakistan-US relations to a head. The parliamentary committee’s recommendations, though as rhetorical as they would be under the military command, contain a symbolic message — foreign policy is now in the domain of the civilian government.

But the recent meeting of the Pakistani prime minister and the American president was no meeting of minds. As someone rightly pointed out, there is no common ground between the US demands for security and Pakistan’s cries for sovereignty.

Lack of trust mars the Pak-US relations and the situation in the last four years has unfortunately gone from bad to worse.

Kindly add how much has been added to the national grid, specify the projects initiated.

This was originally meant to be in the grey list, mind you. But the countrywide protests (not the first ones) forced us to bring it here. The government, it seems, still basks in the agreements that the Benazir Bhutto government signed with the IPPs in the 1990s. It continues to blame the Musharraf government for bringing the country to this crisis-like situation. Energy requires long term planning no doubt. In the short term, the government opted for the Rental Power Plants (RPPs) as a quick-fix. These turned out to be faulty, highly-expensive and non-viable. In the Supreme Court, charges of kickbacks have been brought to light too.

Compared to the Musharraf government, this government made efforts to add more electricity to the national grid. It has started work on more hydro-power generation plans and mulled purchase of natural gas and electricity from countries like Iran and India.

But as of now, when even the summers have not set in, the country faces a record high shortfall of more than 6000megawatts. Unscheduled loadshedding and fuel surcharge in electricity bills have forced the common man to come out on streets in protest.

Student unions
Nurseries of youth politics dried

On March 29, 2008, PM Gilani announced to restore student unions in the first 100 days of his government. Today on the 1,464th day of his uninterrupted rule, the promise is unfulfilled. His two sons and a daughter are lucky to become legislators and Goodwill Ambassadors. Similar is the case of President Zardari’s children being groomed in politics at public expense. The elite kids enjoy this right at universities abroad.

But for the 2.5 million plus students at 132 public-private universities, 1,275 colleges, and 3,399 higher secondary institutions in Pakistan, the constitutionally acknowledged ‘Right to Association’ is a dream. At 18, they are entitled to vote but at educational institutes have to submit an affidavit to remain ‘apolitical.’

Student unions were banned in 1984 by General Zia and endorsed by the Apex Court to dry the supply line of potential leadership. They were briefly restored by Benazir Bhutto in 1988. The Gilani government constituted a committee but majority of the public sector universities resisted the move. The private universities simply refused to facilitate this right. Today, campuses remain an open space for student wings of political parties and jihadi outfits.

 

 

Contributions by Zafarullah Khan, Farah Zia, Shahzada Irfan Ahmed, Usman Ghafoor, Aoun Sahi, Ather Naqvi and Alefia T. Hussain

 

 

 

 


BACK ISSUES