|
|
|
instep
interview
Probing into
A Mighty Heart
Asra Q Nomani talks to Instep, furthering her views on her friend
Daniel Pearl's murder, the film A Mighty Heart and its depiction
of Pakistan and its people
By
Sonya Rehman
|
|
A
journalist beheaded, a mujahideen killed, a government overthrown
and a race exterminated. These are the stories, of people and nations
that are kept alive via documentaries, docudramas and feature films.
And for years, filmmakers have produced works of their very own individual
accounts of a historical or political event. You will notice, for
instance, that a film (which has been reproduced by different directors)
will differ in its facts and overall execution. Personal perspectives,
on the part of various filmmakers, will eventually and inevitably
seep into the movie's script; its general backbone.
But at times, even the slightest stereotypical depiction or unrealistic
approach/angle to a film unleashes a roaring visual vehicle of distortion,
which in turn, affects the viewer's perception. And that is what is
truly dangerous.
|
|
|
A
Mighty Heart, a book, penned down by the wife of a slain American
journalist, Daniel Pearl, was adapted into a film which has been internationally
released this year in June. Mariane's book chronicles the events that
led up to her husband's disappearance in Karachi, Pakistan, in 2002.
But as stated in the beginning, somehow, the movie manages to teeter
off the edge into a pool of murky bias in some aspects. |
|
"Obviously
any film about Daniel Pearl is bound to inevitably reflect badly upon
Pakistan," Hasan Zaidi founder of the Karafilm festival says.
"Considering the kind of incident it was, it wouldn't create
a positive impression of Pakistan. But my problem with the movie is
something different. The film doesn't tell you anything more than
you already know. Winterbottom, don't get me wrong, is an extremely
talented director but I was looking for something slightly more insightful
as to what really happened. As depicted in the film, the bustling
roads of Karachi, and its overall 'exoticization' could have been
less stereotypical."
Hasan was absolutely right. And to delve into the matter further,
I decided to contact Asra Q Nomani - Daniel's colleague whose role
was played by the talented Archie Punjabi in the film.
|
|
|
What
truly prompted me to contact Asra was her article (which appeared
in quite a few national and international publications) entitled,
A Mighty Shame, where she writes: "…the moviemakers and
their PR machine seemed intent on two very different and much shallower
goals: creating a mega-star vehicle for Angelina Jolie, who plays
Mariane, and promoting the glib and clichéd idea that both
Danny and Mariane were 'ordinary heroes'", and, "For me,
watching the movie was like having people enter my home, rearrange
the furniture and reprogram my memory".
I felt the need to get to the bottom of Asra's discontentment with
the film and therefore, in an email interview, I finally got my answers.
Instep:
Did either you or Mariane get to read the final script before the
film went into production?
Asra Nomani: I was given a copy of scripts through the summer of
2006, close to the date of production. I offered many suggestions.
By the time they had a final script, I had probably become such
a pain they might have wished I'd just go away, so I didn't see
the final script. |
|
|
Instep:
What were Mariane's thoughts about the film?
AN: From the press interviews I've read, she has publicly said that
she liked the movie.
Instep: And what were Mariane's sentiments regarding Jolie's
depiction of her?
AN: There, too, from the press interviews, it seems that Mariane
liked Angelina Jolie's depiction of her.
Instep: Do you think Archie Panjabi did a good job playing your
role?
AN: Archie did a really good job with what she was allowed to do.
Like most people, I had a cynical view about the intellect that
actors put into their roles. Archie, as well as the Pakistani actors
whom I met during production in India, proved me wrong. Michael
Winterbottom sent the actors to visit with the characters they would
be playing. Archie was the lucky winner of a visit to the heartland
of America: my home in Morgantown, West Virginia. I went through
my photos of my days as a pal of Danny's in the Washington DC bureau
of the Wall Street Journal. She saw Danny in his long hair and ponytail
phase. She read our email exchanges to each other so she'd understand
our banter. She even tried my favourite item at our local Dairy
Queen - a banana split Blizzard - to be able to know me better.
But most importantly she learned the details of the investigation
to find Danny as thoroughly as if we were still in the midst of
it. She knew every player and every twist and turn in our struggle
to try to find Danny. And in a true signal of professional sacrifice:
she learned to speak English with an American accent, stopping just
short of saying 'dude', as I do, and she spoke the same lyrical
brand of bad Urdu that I speak. When I watched the movie I felt
sad because not only did I feel the movie didn't capture the real
people portrayed, but I believe it didn't reflect the depth of all
of the individuals who were involved in the film. In India, I met
many of the Pakistani actors who were in the movie, and I was very
impressed by their thoughtfulness and intellect.
Instep: In one of your emails, you stated: "If you can believe
it, I stood up against the movie's portrayal of the 'Karachi elite'
whose intellect I thought was too quickly dismissed." Could
you elaborate on this further because one does feels the representation
of the 'Karachi elite' to be insensitive somehow. Why? Also, did
that scene take place in actuality? If it did, how was it different
from the film's dinner scene?
AN: As the movie showed, I did throw a dinner party at my house
the night Danny left for the interview (that he thought was going
to be with Sheikh Gilani). I wanted to introduce Danny and Mariane
to the world I had entered in Karachi through my boyfriend at the
time. Sadly, as the movie showed, Danny never arrived for the dinner.
Through the evening Mariane was calling Danny's mobile phone, but
it had gone out of service. I started calling, as well, and then
I told my then-boyfriend and his friends. It's true that while concerned
they didn't jump into action. As I remember that night, I am filled
with regret, because maybe if we had sent up a flare to U.S. and
Pakistani officials as soon as we knew Danny wasn't picking up his
phone, we could have gotten clues about his whereabouts while the
trail was still hot. Alas, folks didn't kick into action until the
next morning. To me, the movie took the easy way out. It's easy
to caricature and mock the elite of any country as arrogant and
cavalier. But sometimes I think we forget that - despite the privileges
of inherited status that many of us most certainly receive –
they have probably become the elite through some expression of intellect,
education and proficiency. Shaukat Aziz, for example, is a living
example of a so-called member of the elite who could be dismissed
but indeed he is actually being substantive in his contribution
to his country. Back to our dinner, I argued that it wasn't appropriate
to dismiss the men and women who were gathered for the dinner. My
former boyfriend, for example, was the one who suggested we immediately
contact the Citizens Police Liaison Committee, but I didn't take
the suggestion seriously because - you have to admit it - on the
surface the name sounds sort of funky. That was me, however, being
cavalier and dismissive.
I thought the movie had an opportunity with that dinner party to
show more than just dispassion in the Karachi elite, because at
the end of the day, they are also very smart and they care enough
about their country to remain on its soil.
Instep: In your opinion, why did Paramount fail to give depth to
Pearl's character? A Mighty Heart focuses only on the 'hunt' for
Pearl's murderers. As a Pakistani one feels disconnected from the
movie. The script fails to bond the protagonists and the viewers.
Pakistan has been depicted as a barbaric, suspicious and filthy
country – the energy of A Mighty Heart seems thoroughly prejudiced.
What's your take on this?
AN: Truth be told, despite all of the protests from Paramount Vantage
that the movie wasn't a star vehicle for Angelina Jolie, playing
the role of Mariane, I think that's what the movie was edited to
become on the big screen. Sadly I think that nobody's character
got developed. That's Hollywood, so to speak. But I felt it was
unconscionable that Danny's character was sacrificed. When I watched
the movie for the first time, I told my mother, "Danny played
a cameo in his own murder." To me, as a Muslim, I thought that
the film also squandered an opportunity to show the complexity of
Pakistan and Muslims. For example, after we learn of Danny's murder
through beheading, we see a scene where a man is about ready to
butcher a goat for Eid. I cringed in my seat when I saw the image,
because I felt that this ritual of Muslim culture became a symbol
of barbarism by Muslims – the kind of barbarism that killed
Danny. As a Muslim, I know that it's not that simple. Sure, we have
issues - serious problems that we need to tackle - but we are neither
monolithic nor barbaric as a people.
Instep: How has the film been received in America?
AN: Before the movie was released in the theatres, reviewers loved
it. I wondered if they watched the same movie I had seen. After
the movie was released, it tanked in theatres, not making much money
and being pulled from many theatres because of the poor audience
turnout. Some people would say that that reflects the failure of
a serious movie in American theatres. But I wouldn't draw that conclusion.
To me, the movie simply wasn't a good movie.
Instep: What other contentions do you have with the film?
AN: Look, I'm not one to ever give a government official a pass,
but I have to say that while then-Interior Minister, Moinuddin Haider,
did try to blame India and even Danny when we met with him, seeking
help, he didn't cut us off and run us out of his office, as the
movie showed. That was an instance where I felt that creative license
was used to caricature a foreign government official. And, definitely,
President Musharraf was made to look like a hapless, clueless leader
when he said that he hoped that Danny was alive during his visit
to Washington to meet with President Bush, and we later find out
he was actually already dead.
|
|
|