A lawyer's ordeal
Munir A Malik narrates a chilling account of his imprisonment and near-fatal illness caused by negligence

By Beena Sarwar

"It was psychological torture to the worst degree," says Munir A Malik, former President Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA), talking about his three-week ordeal in prison before he was belatedly taken to hospital with renal failure. "It can drive a person insane to be lying on a bed staring at the ceiling for 16 hours."

meeting
'Cinema for me is a very sensuous experience'

Govind Nihalani has a way with dark themes. Whether it's Aakrosh (1980), his debut feature that strikes you for its frighteningly realistic depiction of a victim of the faulty judicial system, Ardh Satya ('83) that exteriorises the moral dilemma of an honest police officer in a corrupt system; Tamas ('88), a hard-hitting chronicle of the travails of a Hindu family forced to leave Pakistan at the time of partition; Drohkaal ('94) -- set in the backdrop of terrorism; or Hazaar Churasi Ki Maan ('97), about the awakening of self of a revolutionary's mother -- this celebrated Indian film director-cum-cinematographer has mostly addressed strong social and political issues impacting an individual. Even his comedy -- Party ('85) -- was in the Black genre. All these movies remain his career milestones.

Of loss and the other Damon
Man rediscovers his self both in connection and confrontation with the city in the etchings of Australian print maker Damon Kowarsky 
By Quddus Mirza
Damon Kowarsky, the Australian print maker, recently held his solo exhibition 'Home and Away' at Alhamra Art Gallery Lahore. He is an artist in residence and visiting faculty at the Beaconhouse National University; before coming to Lahore, he visited other parts of the world including Yemen, Egypt and Mexico.

Of their own choice
The musical nights of the World Performing Arts Festival were so organised that there was something for everyone
 

By Sarwat Ali
It appeared that the music programmes of the World Performing Arts Festival were the most popular shows of the event. Every night after the plays, the puppets , the films and dance performances were over, the scene shifted to the vast open air auditorium of the Alhamra Cultural Complex and musical sessions were held that lasted late into the night. Despite the vast spaces and the growing cold of the late November and early December, it was rare that one felt that the venue was too big for the holding of such programmes.

 

 By Beena Sarwar

"It was psychological torture to the worst degree," says Munir A Malik, former President Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA), talking about his three-week ordeal in prison before he was belatedly taken to hospital with renal failure. "It can drive a person insane to be lying on a bed staring at the ceiling for 16 hours."

Malik was arrested on Nov 3 from his hotel room in Islamabad. His colleague Justice (retired) Tariq Mahmood (who also got ill in prison) was with him earlier. Both had just reached Islamabad when they heard about the emergency. Expecting the arrest, Malik waited in his hotel room with the door open. The police arrived at about 10.30pm and took him to Kohsar police station where he deposited his cell phone. He arrived at Adiala Jail at 3am, half an hour after Aitzaz Ahsan.

The following day the superintendent said Malik was being transferred "to a 'better class', by which he meant B Class. Aitzaz threatened to bang his head against the wall until it bled if they removed me. They left."

The superintendent was transferred, having apparently lost the trust of the agencies running the show. "The new Superintendent had a Taliban-style beard and no moustache," says Malik. "He is the man who was Yusuf Raza Gillani's, [PPP Leader] nemesis when he was in Jail. I was woken up at 2am and told he wanted to see me. We woke up Aitzaz. Hameed Gul (who was brought in with his son that day) offered to go with me, but I said no, Aitzaz is my leader. The superintendent said I was being transferred to Attock. Aitzaz again wanted to resist, but I refused. They would have taken me by force."

At around 3am, Malik was put in a police mobile along with Siddique-ul-Farooque, [PML Leader], who was being sent to Bahawalpur Jail -- via Attock! Farooq had to endure the bumpy four-hour long ride to Attock, plus many more hours to Bahawalpur in the south. It was bitterly cold. The prisoners did not have adequate clothing. They arrived at Attock at 6.30 am, where plainclothesmen took Malik through a side gate, and into a room.

"Inside was a mean-looking fellow, weighing about 200 pounds, with a shawl over his shoulders. He thumped his chest and said, 'You know who I am? I am the person against whom the first suo moto action was taken' [i.e. by Chief Justice of Pakistan]. He wanted to know where Hamid Khan (another former SCBA President) was -- he had said that if Musharraf's uniform would have to be peeled off if it was a 'second skin'."

Uniformed policemen searched Malik so thoroughly "that if they had been looking for a needle in a haystack they would have found it." He was glad he had removed his money from his socks and handed it in (it was deposited into his account). He was finger printed and photographed like a criminal. Plainclothesmen then took him to the old part of the jail to an area marked 'Maut-yafta qaidiyon ke liye' - for prisoners condemned to death. "There was no one else there. They opened a cell and pushed me in." The cell was bare, with a high ceiling and a concrete slab for a bed. Malik was provided a rough blanket, a rug and a pillow.

"At 8.30am, someone brought a bucket of tea and raw 'nan' (bread) which they offered through the bars. I refused it, saying I was on hunger strike -- that is something I learnt from Aitzaz, as a very effective means of protest in jail. I told them I was not a criminal; I was brought there under preventive detention, not charged with any offence."

Malik used his account to get another blanket and a pillow, but was still cold. However, the cold was easier to endure than the isolation. "It was difficult to pass the day. At 4pm they lock you in until breakfast. You can only lie on the mattress and stare at the ceiling. I listened to the trains and reconciled their timings with my watch. The first train went by at 6am. I had no newspapers, nothing. I started scratching on the wall to record the days, to retain my sanity and sense of time. On the second day, I was still on hunger strike."

The jail superintendent said Malik was not in solitary confinement, but there was no other accommodation. "I asked if I could have something to read, but for that, he said the orders would have to 'come from above'."

At around 6 pm on Nov 7, Malik's solitary confinement ended, although he was allowed no visitors until four days after -- close family and one legal counsel (he appointed Tanvir Paracha, a local advocate). He was taken to the new portion of the jail, 'Pehra number four', a quadrangle with sixteen cells, about 8x4 feet each, with a concrete 'bed' slab. Malik was put in Cell no. 6, "the 'qusuri' cell meant for prisoners who had violated a jail rule or. They would be shackled if they were considered dangerous."

Each cells could accommodate one person ("and even that was suffocating") but contained three to four prisoners each. They were sent elsewhere when Malik was brought in. Apparently the barrack was needed for lawyers and those resisting the emergency.

Seven other lawyers were brought in at around 3am from Multan, having been picked up from courts. Others came in and were released over the coming weeks. One lawyer came in from Sahiwal.

"He was among the 41 who were injured during a torch-lit procession during the lawyers' movement to restore the chief justice. The police threw acid at them. His face was still disfigured. The Sahiwal bar has given the greatest sacrifices. The police filed an anti-terrorism case against them. The lawyers filed a direct complaint against police brutality. The Chief Justice of the Lahore High Court froze their file to protect the police," alleges Malik.

Malik ended his hunger strike because the local PML-N representative, former MNA Sheikh Aftab sent breakfast for the prisoners. "He was very generous and sent food for all of us, even when at one point there were 26 of us (when PPP workers were arrested and brought in)."

The first four cells of the barracks were apparently reserved for Nawaz Sharif: carpeted, air-conditioned bedroom with mattress, kitchen with fridge, study with table, and a bathroom. The bedroom was the only place with an electric socket where an ECG machine could be plugged in when a doctor from Attock General Hospital came to check the prisoners after newspapers reported that Malik was unwell. "He checked all the prisoners, we got to lie on the mattress for 30 minutes." They were allowed in the open courtyard from 7.30am till 4pm, but it was difficult to pass the time after being locked in for the night. The cell was cold and uncomfortable. Malik would fall asleep around 10pm. The light bulb hanging from the ceiling stayed on 24 hours.

By Friday, Nov 9, Malik started getting ill. The jail doctor catered to 1,400 prisoners (the facility has a capacity of 340). The medicines prescribed were often not available in Attock, and someone had to go to Rawalpindi to purchase them. Malik's medication was frequently changed. It did not work, and he had to take sleeping pills at night.

"When I had visitors, I had to say I was fine. It was for them to judge from my body language. There was always someone from ISI standing behind me and I feared repercussions. By the next Friday (Nov 16) I could feel the fluid shifting from one side to the other in my stomach. Specialists from outside hospitals came to see me. They all said I should be transferred to hospital, but no one did anything." One specialist extracted water from Malik's stomach with a syringe. Contrary to the impression of his family and friends, he was never transferred to the jail hospital.

"By the third Friday (Nov 23) I was completely incoherent, unable to even get up." He doesn't remember much of the next couple of days, after being finally taken to Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad. By then, he was near death. Doctors say it is a miracle he survived. He has undergone dialysis four times since then. He was transferred from PIMS to the Sindh Institute of Urology & Transplant in Karachi, on Nov 29.

He is still weak, but recovering and able to take a small daily walk. The doctors are still investigating whether any permanent damage has been inflicted on his kidneys. He still has trouble sleeping, as the tubes inserted for the dialysis procedure do not allow him to turn on his side.

Many imprisoned lawyers around the country were released after they signed undertakings promising not to take part in politics. However, Malik received no such offer. In any case, he says that he "would have died rather than sign such an undertaking".

 


meeting
'Cinema for me is a very sensuous experience'

Govind Nihalani has a way with dark themes. Whether it's Aakrosh (1980), his debut feature that strikes you for its frighteningly realistic depiction of a victim of the faulty judicial system, Ardh Satya ('83) that exteriorises the moral dilemma of an honest police officer in a corrupt system; Tamas ('88), a hard-hitting chronicle of the travails of a Hindu family forced to leave Pakistan at the time of partition; Drohkaal ('94) -- set in the backdrop of terrorism; or Hazaar Churasi Ki Maan ('97), about the awakening of self of a revolutionary's mother -- this celebrated Indian film director-cum-cinematographer has mostly addressed strong social and political issues impacting an individual. Even his comedy -- Party ('85) -- was in the Black genre. All these movies remain his career milestones.

As a cinematographer, he has worked on Richard Attenborough's Oscar-winning epic, Gandhi, and Shyam Benegal's National Award-winning Junoon.

Once an avowed part of the so-called 'parallel cinema' movement in the 70s and the 80s -- that was a reaction against the popular mainstream Bollywood -- and having worked with its doyen "Shyam babu", Govind is today raring to "move on and explore the other genres of film making". Though 2000's Thakshak and, more recently, Dev, have already seen him make a departure from his 'usual' style. Up next is a colourful animation. He is also planning a musical and a thriller.

Govind was recently in Lahore to attend the RPTW's World Performing Arts Festival 2007, where he had been especially invited by the Peerzadas to showcase some of his best works, when he took time out to speak to TNS.

 

The News on Sunday: Is this your first time in Lahore?

Govind Nihalani: Yes; and also my first time in Pakistan. Though, I was born in Karachi (in pre-partition India), I could never go back. In fact, I've been thinking about a film with Lahore as the backdrop, which was basically the idea of Usman Peerzada whom I met early this year in Delhi where he was performing Patay Khan. The idea couldn't materialise, but when Usman invited me to attend the festival I jumped to the occasion.

TNS: What are your early memories of the place?

GN: Unfortunately, my first memory is that of fear and blood. It's more of an emotional memory than a logical sequence of events. I must be six or seven at that time. Much later, when I was making Tamas, these were the haunting images that formed the backdrop of the film, and provided me with my much-needed catharsis.

TNS: You grew up to enroll at a film institute?

GN: Well, I knew I had a film maker in me, but I didn't want to get into films untrained. So, I enrolled at S J C Film Institute in Bangalore, graduating in Cinematography.

TNS: What were your early cinematic influences?

GN: Chiefly Bergman, Francis Ford Coppola, Martin Scorsese, and the neo-realist European cinema. On home ground, I was inspired by the works of Satyajit Ray, Hritik Ghatak, Mrinal Sen, Arvindan and Shyam babu. I was excited by the possibilities of media, the scope of aesthetics that they employed, and the way they treated the stories. Then, Gulzar's movies have a lyrical quality that appealed to me a lot.

TNS: What does cinema mean to you?

GN: That's actually a very difficult thing to answer. But, I can safely say that cinema for me is always a very sensuous experience -- both as a film maker and as a viewer. I don't look at a film as just a medium to tell a story. I want to create an experience for my audience. That experience starts with me, as an individual, and I am the first viewer of my film. So, the film has to first excite me, and only then I'd want to share that excitement with the viewer. I don't look at film as an exercise which is exclusive.

TNS: What kind of audience do you generally find for your kind of movies in India?

GN: I think my audience is the educated middle-class, mostly urban-based and comprising students and professionals.

See, I've never tried to make a movie that should please everybody. It's an exercise that dilutes the intensity because then you simplify things beyond a point where they become simplistic.

TNS: So, you would rather intellectualise a concept?

GN: If by intellectualising, you mean that an issue is analysed at the cost of drama or emotion, then that's not what I do. If I'm making a film based on a certain social or political issue, there is a certain amount of research that goes into it, and there is a certain point of view that I like to introduce in the film, but I also try to see that my contact with the audience is not disturbed. That contact comes about basically when I create empathy for the characters and I can get my audience emotionally involved.

TNS: When you started in films, there was a movement of the so-called 'parallel' or 'art' cinema gaining popularity. Did you feel a sense of affiliation with that? Were you part of the group that looked down upon Bollywood?

GN: No, we didn't look down upon Bollywood. We just found that there was some disconnect between the popular cinema and the way we were thinking. So, we were rejecting their norms. They wanted stars and songs, but we didn't. They wanted happy endings, but we didn't.

Much later, though, I realised that one could not constantly be in a state of confrontation. You cannot create a film thinking that you don't want such-and-such elements. For me it was like a painter who said he wouldn't use bright colours, but later realised that he shouldn't limit himself to just the gray tones. You can say that first it was a total anti-thesis of popular cinema, and now it's drawing towards a happy synthesis.

TNS: Was this the time when you made Thakshak, your first 'commercial' film?

GN: In Thakshak, I made a conscious effort to use the popular format. Though, the story here wasn't typical of the popular genre. The only elements we had in common were stars and songs.

See, I have nothing against popular cinema. In fact, I believe that popular cinema is the product of our own narrative, folk lore and theatrical traditions, Raas Leela, Ram Leela, nautanki, and tamasha. All the stylistic elements, songs, enactment, melodrama, dialogue and the like form part of the popular cinema. Then we have the old Sanskrit treatise on performing arts -- the nine 'rasas' that include comedy (hasaya), fear (bhaya), eroticism (shinghaar) etc. According to the theory, in every work of art, you must have these 'rasas'. But, one 'rasa' has got to dominate. If you arrive at a work where all the rasas are balanced, that's when you create the epic.

TNS: You've never attempted a comedy, have you?

GN: No, but I'd love to. I'd also love to make a musical. Even a thriller. As a student of cinema, I want to explore all genres. I appreciate the concern of the viewer and the critic who think that perhaps my work is getting diluted, but they should also consider the fact that I am trying to challenge myself.

TNS: Today, when 'crossover' is the buzzword in Indian cinema and all big production houses are eyeing global market and getting rid of the old-fashioned Bollywood cliches, is there a need for 'art' cinema at all?

GN: See, we have to get rid of these definitions, to begin with. These terms are the legacy of the 70s and 80s when such terms were created in an effort to understand the new kind of cinema (parallel).

TNS: Some critics believe that you are a better cinematographer than a director. Comment.

GN: I cannot fault those who think that way. The subjects that I choose are not very glamorous anyway. But, when I was working with Shyam babu, I could afford to indulge myself because my concentration would completely be on camera work. Whenever there's a conflict between the cameraman and the director, it's the latter who wins.

TNS: Any recent works you've truly admired?

GN: A few films that I have liked recently, apart from my own film Dev which is very dear to me, are Omkara, Rang De Basanti, and Metro. I also enjoy David Dhawan and Priyadarshan movies. The good thing about their films is that they are not pretentious. Here, I'd like to quote Bernard Shaw, "As normal people we need trash and classics at the same time." (laughs)

TNS: Ever had a chance to see a Pakistani film?

GN: Unfortunately, no. I've just seen Khamosh Pani, and I liked it a lot. Actually, we don't have access to your movies in India.

TNS: Currently, is there an idea that's exciting you the most?

GN: I am working on a film which is a 3-D animation called Kamlu. It's about a baby camel and its adventures in the desert.



Of loss and the other Damon
Man rediscovers his self both in connection and confrontation with the city in the etchings of Australian print maker Damon Kowarsky 

Damon Kowarsky, the Australian print maker, recently held his solo exhibition 'Home and Away' at Alhamra Art Gallery Lahore. He is an artist in residence and visiting faculty at the Beaconhouse National University; before coming to Lahore, he visited other parts of the world including Yemen, Egypt and Mexico.

His etchings in the show depict that displacement is the main theme for the artist who is living away from his home. In this respect he is not alone; a number of people in the metropolises today are alien citizens who have moved from their homelands.

This kind of dislocation produces a certain type of behaviour: of surviving [in] a contradiction. We experience this attitude among people who live in a particular place, but often appear to be in a state of constant discontentment. This kind of response mainly develops because of hardship, frustration and failure one faces in the daily struggle for survival.

To cope with their difficult situations, several among us choose to create an imaginary setting, containing elements from our places of origin and picked up from memory. Here the mind operates in a positive manner; it transforms the past experiences into pleasant (yet imagined) realities. The social setup of big cities -- with minimum personal contact and huge crowds of unknown people swarming in the shopping malls, streets, parks and other urban places -- aggravates the feeling of loneliness.

In that sense, man rediscovers his self both in connection and confrontation with the city. City assumes a great significance in the psyche of a citizen who perceives it as a combination of structures that are unknown, uninviting and unbearable. Perhaps, for him, roaming in the city is an experience not much dissimilar from moving in a desert, since in both places one tends to lose the sense of direction and gets an illusion of being lost.

Actually this interaction between a human being and a space constructed/divided into buildings and houses is a relatively new urban phenomenon. People, who migrate from villages, find it hard to spend their lives in isolated structures -- be they flats, quarters or bungalows -- detached from their nextdoor neighbours. This social pattern is new for our public; yet it manages to subvert urban alienation by making connections with others living in the same surroundings.

So, for a majority of us, the urban experience is not only about isolation; it could be a means to create new bonds and establish new relationships. But not everyone in other parts of the world shares the same experience. Often, living in industrial cities of the West is like being lost in a concrete jungle. Hordes of people are rushing from one place to the other -- walking close to others, but without having the faintest idea of their identity or existence. Their entire concentration is focused on their destinations -- offices, apartments, restaurants etc.

This search, which is almost a norm in every big city of the world, appears to be the primary concern for Damon Kowarsky. In his prints, human beings are drawn in relation to the built environment. A large figure of a man almost half naked (probably in an attempt to depict a man without any national identification, which is possible through the style of clothes) is set against a blocks of houses and a jumble of buildings. He appears to be an outsider, trying to reach the heart of a city that is apparently devoid of inhabitants.

But in an interesting paradox, this outsider -- the primordial figure who is away from the houses -- is the real city. As cities are formed with human population, so one can not conceive a town without people; and in some way, the city is not outside of man, it is the man himself that makes the city. Somehow, this situation is similar to one of the stories of Jorge Luis Borges. In his story 'The Approach to Al-Mu'tasim' (also the title of one print by Kowarsky), a man is split into different identities -- becoming himself the subject of his writing. The story ends with a reference to the Persian text 'Mantiq ur Tair', in which a large number of birds fly to search their king Simurgh who, after the hard course of journey, on reaching their destination, find out that only thirty of them survived the journey. Then they realise that actually they themselves are Simurgh, the king of birds (because Simurgh literally means thirty birds).

Likewise, the lonely figure on the outskirts of the city is the city itself. So even though it is away, it is not detached. This seems to be the fate of many people around us, who can identify with the situations created by Damon Kowarsky.

Besides the obvious theme of alienation in these prints, it is the deft handling of materials that contributes towards making his work more meaningful. The simplified drawing of a masculine figure, constructed with a few lines and marks, conveys the essential position of a man looking longingly towards the estranged world. This basic aspect of human behaviour is enhanced with the rendering of cityscape (inspired from various places such as Mexico City and Cairo) like an unfathomable wall. The lines of houses with details of pipes, windows, doors and other details stretch like a fortress behind the man.

The narrative of man and the built environment may have a personal interpretation for Damon, since Lahore is the recent port of arrival in his itinerary of travels. We have to wait to find out in what way the city of Lahore will emerge in his work in future. Looking at his exhibition at Alhamra, one assumes that it may not be too different since the city in his work is an internal site -- an element that makes his work interesting, relevant and familiar, even though he comes from another continent, Australia.


Of their own choice

It appeared that the music programmes of the World Performing Arts Festival were the most popular shows of the event. Every night after the plays, the puppets , the films and dance performances were over, the scene shifted to the vast open air auditorium of the Alhamra Cultural Complex and musical sessions were held that lasted late into the night. Despite the vast spaces and the growing cold of the late November and early December, it was rare that one felt that the venue was too big for the holding of such programmes.

Even when the music programmes of forms which are not that popular, like that of classical music, were held it was heartening to see that the venue was almost full. Lahore with its diverse population and varied interests has an audience for all kinds of music. During the session it was not unlikely to overhear remarks and comparative comments about the musical performances of pre-partition era -- those great days when Ustads Ashiq Ali Khan and Bare Ghulam Ali Khan ruled the roost and enthralled people by their virtuosity and antics and the state of music these days. Being among people who want to listen to more esoteric and arcane forms of music revives the hope that even now something can be done about the more serious forms of musical expression in the country.

The programmes had been so organised that there was something for everyone. If there was the classical music night to culminate the festival there were folk, qawwali, devotional music, pop, fusion and world music nights as well. It was interesting to note that every form of music had its own audience and it was not small and it was rare that the audiences overlapped. Most of the people just came to listen to the music of their own choice -- the pop, rock, fusion and world music drawing the younger lot much more than the other forms which now has a niche audience.

Due to the cold the organisers had made special concession by altering the order of performance. It is a norm with classical music shows that the most senior and venerated artists are the ones to perform last. This time round the most senior artists performed in the middle as most of them are now well into their seventies and some are not keeping great health. It has been a common complaint and grumble of Lahoris that usually in such concerts when the best artists come to perform the night is about to end with only a very few diehard lovers left in the auditorium. These Ustads performed in the middle while a small audience had been left to listen to the not that well-known performers that rounded off the programme.

The artists who performed were Ustad Fateh Ali Khan, Rustam Ali Khan, Ustad Ghulam Hussain Shaggan, Qadir Shaggan, Mubarak Ali Khan, Ustad Fateh Ali Khan Hyderabadi, Mazhar Shaggan, Chand Khan, Sooraj Khan, Akbar Ali, Salman Amjad Amanat and Ali Amjad, Tassadduq Ali Khan, Hamid Ali Khan, Hussain Buksh Gullo, Shafqat Ali Khan, Latafat Ali Khan, Muhammed Akhtar Khan, Sharafat Ali Khan, Naqi Ali Khan and Rakae Jamil.

Among the qawwals who dominated the qawwali night were Mehr Ali Sher Ali, Abu Fareed and Ghulam Farid Ayaz, Muazzam and Rizwan and last but not the least Sher Miandad. One misses the trio of the great qawwals who established this form at the international level but echoes of Nusrat Fateh Ali, Ghulam Fareed Sabri and Munshi Raziuddin can still be heard in the present day qawwali.

Another very popular trend is that of fusion. Most of the fusion endeavours are not preplanned but just happen as the artists get into an improvisational mould. Many of the previous fusions were acts of spontaneity as well. In this festival too a whole night was dedicated to fusion. With growing globalisation and the explosion of the media it has become impossible to nurture one's tradition in isolation. Perhaps the voice and sound of the contemporary era is the coming together in fusion, albeit not in any perfect harmony.

The groups and artists who participated in the festival were Kamaliya from Ukraine, Cankisou from the Czech Republic, Lal from Canada, Kenny Hogan from Singapore, Martin Lubenov from Bulgaria, Caravan Quartet from France, Peter Pankee from Germany and Char Venner from Norway.

A large number of artists performed at the folk night like Allah Ditta Lunewala, Arif Lohar, Mansoor Malangi, Surraiya Khanum, Zarsanga, Akhtar Channar Zehri, Babar and Javed Niazi, Raza Allan, Krishen Lal Bheel, Bashir Lohar, Sain Zahoor, Taaj Mastani, and Iqbal Bahu. It was quite representative of the various regions of this country as some of the major folk forms were played. If there was kafi, there was also jugni; if there was geet there was also Pushto, Brahvi, Balochi and Sindhi folk.

The ghazal night had a number of performers, some known and some not that well known? Tina Sani was there with her repertoire of ghazals mainly from Faiz, and there were Naqi Ali Khan, Shahzad Ali, Surraiya Khanum, Hussain Buksh Gullu, Hamid Ali Khan and the devotional night had Sain Zahoor, the dholias from the Punjab, Gunga and Mithu Sain, Shah Jo Fakirs from Bhit Shah, and Sanam Marvi.

Among the younger crowd the pop and fusion stars were the biggest draw. If there were the local pop groups there were also those who belong to the Diaspora and have been mainly instrumental in bringing this fusion to some respectable stage. Atif Aslam was a big attraction as was Abrarul Haq. Many others participated in the session including Sohail Salamat, Javaid Bashir, Natasha, Raga Boyz, Rafaqat Ali Khan, Arieb Azhar, Omar Inayat, and groups like Roxen, Overload, and Call were all applauded well into the night.

|Home|Daily Jang|The News|Sales & Advt|Contact Us|


BACK ISSUES