|
|
|
instep interview
"The plays that I have brought here, like
Moulin Rouge and Phantom of the Opera, are still reproduced in
London and New York. I don't see what's wrong in the kind of theatre
I am doing."-- Shah Sharabeel
He's a mover and a shaker who offends a lot of people
and a lot of sensibilities. The man who introduced amateur theatre
to the capital speaks out in his own defense. Instep hears what
he has to say…
Maria Tirmizi
|
|
If
you have been living in Islamabad for a good few years now, and
still haven't heard of Shah Sharabeel, it is safe to declare that
theatre isn't one of your particularly consuming interests. A figure
who first came to town amidst much pomp and cheer, bringing people
out of their sheltered bureaucratic existence and giving young artists
a platform they weren't accustomed to, he has quite some reasons
to be content with his life and his work.
But he doesn't seem to be rejoicing much. Pensive, and at times
intensely defensive, he keeps up the appearance of a man who has
been wronged.
Every man deserves a chance to speak out for himself, and those
who feel that the media has been biased towards them, perhaps even
more. Here is what Sharabeel had to say to Instep.
|
|
|
Instep: How did you get
involved in theatre?
Shah Sharabeel: The story is a bit personal. I was in first year
and had never seen a play in my life. I was with this young girl
who was studying at Kinnaird College and she used to take part in
KC's annual plays. I got to see a few plays with her but didn't
take it very seriously. After 2, 3 years, our relationship came
to an end like any other relationship. I loved her I guess, and
whenever some incident takes place in my life, I try to make a positive
resolution out of it. When she walked away, I thought to myself,
maybe I wasn't very intellectually stimulating for her. I decided
that I will do theatre--- such a theatre that the whole country
will know my name.
Instep: What was your first play?
SS: I did Phantom of the Opera in 1990 in Lahore. At that time,
plays used to take place only at Kinnaird, Aitchison and Government
College. There was no concept of private production. I did it all
by myself, putting up black and white posters on electricity poles.
The cost of production of my first play was 25,000 rupees. And now,
that is the amount we pay to each student.
Instep: So you actually pay amateur artists?
SS: Well, there was no concept of paying amateurs. I'm the one who
started it. But still, you will find that I am somewhat controversial
because the 20 per cent of people who come to work with dedication
become my best friends, and the 70 per cent who're into theatre
to party and get popular with chicks end up disliking me when I
put my foot down with them.
Instep: Tell us something about your life before you got into theatre.
SS: I have five sisters and I'm the only brother. My parents got
divorced when I was five. My father is a very well educated person.
He has done two PhD's and three masters. But he has never worked
in his life. He would sit reading books in his rocking chair all
day long. It was my mother who worked really hard to take care of
us.
I was in hostels most of the time and after I did my matriculation
and came home, I started throwing my weight around, telling my mother
not to do this or that. One day she said to me, "When you grow
up and have financial responsibilities of your own, then you will
have the right to talk". When she said that, I picked up my
clothes and left the house. I was only 16. I said to myself, I will
earn money on my own. Loads of money.
Instep: And what was the first job you took?
SS: I was mopping bathrooms in Inter Continental Hotel. I have waited
tables. I have been a salesman at a store. I started my own men's
wear label in the 90s and opened up a snack bar called Malibu at
Pace, Lahore. I will never let my urchin streak die out in me because
it has made me what I am. I'm a workaholic who worked 18 hours a
day just out of reaction.
Instep: What has this whole theatre experience been like to you?
SS: Theatre is now my life. Theatre has taught me how to be a good
manager. Theatre has taught me business and administration. I believe
I'm an average person when it comes to talent but one reason I'm
successful is because I am crazy about discipline.
I want to share something else as well. In theatre, audiences are
the opinion makers of society. And our audience constitutes of the
privileged class. This class, with due respect, is very difficult.
It's not easy getting a round of applause from them.
Instep: Why do you find the privileged class so difficult?
SS: I'm from a lower middle class. A lot of things happened in my
life that made me interact with this privileged class and I have
this strong belief that most of them are opportunists and selfish.
At least 90 per cent of them. I've seen well educated people deriving
political mileage out of things. I believe Pakistan has no system
or structure. Let me tell you something. People talk about this
country needing education. I disagree. It's not only education that
we need. Because if you pick up a malicious man, send him to Harvard
or Yale, his maliciousness will sharpen even more. On the other
hand, if you send a decent, well-intentioned man to a mediocre university,
he will turn out to be an asset to the country. All this country
needs is a sense of justice, and that has nothing to do with education.
Instep: Speaking of justice, during one of your plays, Bombay Dreams,
your statements regarding the chief justice got you a lot of flack
from the media. Why did you make those comments, knowing they were
very controversial and went against the major sentiment in the country?
SS: Firstly, the major sentiment has been created by the media.
Secondly, I was never against the fact that the full court should
reinstate the chief justice. He should have been reinstated because
you just cannot throw a chief justice out. Our judges are the assets
of our country. I agree with this fact totally. But I also believe
the decision was incomplete. They should have reinstated the chief
justice, and then also look into the allegations against him. That
was my point.
Instep: Your personal experience with regard to your project being
cancelled got a lot of attention as well.
SS: Yes. I had actually thought that since I had done theatre in
Islamabad and proved myself to be creative and talented, I could
bring that experience to give something back to the public. It started
with these advertisements in the newspapers inviting developers
with money and experience to create an activity park for the general
public, with no permanent high rise structures. Nine parties came
forward and there were six months of presentations. I won an open
bidding on the basis of best presentation, designs and concepts.
But then I was confronted with the land mafia. The place being developed
was next to Jinnah Super, and the land mafia said that we will make
shops here. I refused, because the project was for public entertainment
only.
I had grand plans for the public. I was going to set up bungee jumping,
miniature golf, an amphitheatre, a skating rink, bowling, an adventure
track with jogging, hiking and juice bars, still games etc. It would
have been so fulfilling for the public that even if an enemy was
making it, he should have been allowed to do so. I had even designed
this interesting Chai Ghar dedicated to Ghalib. I had spoken to
Nirala about having hot Gulab Jaman , Jalebi and Namak Paray etc
in one corner, and I had spoken to Lever brothers about having a
modern Chai Bar with lemon chai, masala chai, driver chai, rickshaw
chai, literati chai etc. There were going to be walls dedicated
to Parveen Shakir, Ghalib, Oscar Wilde, Shakespeare, lined with
their books and portraits. Aspiring writers could sit and write
and then read out their work on a microphone. And to enter this
entire activity park, you only needed a five rupee ticket.
When I refused the land mafia, even though they offered me so much
money, they threatened that they will not let me go ahead with this.
And they got the contract cancelled.
I met the prime minister during one of my plays and told him that
I had been given this contract on the basis of merit and it had
been cancelled. I asked him if he could at least give CDA orders
to give the contract to the rightful, deserving party, whosoever
it may be. CDA then re-advertised it all over again and it took
another 6 months. I won the contract again. But due to some bureaucrats,
it was cancelled a second time.
After that, I did another play and this time the president came.
I went up to him and told him what had happened. Another bidding
took place and it took one more year. I won a third time. Then I
started working on the project immediately and vigorously for fear
of another cancellation.
But then the Supreme Court intervened. When my case went to the
Supreme Court, I was in fact happy. I had won the project on merit
and I was fearful that another government in the future could cancel
it again. So it would be better for me to have a Supreme Court endorsement
once and for all.
Instep: The Supreme Court felt that a public park was being used
for personal interests.
SS: The Supreme Court's decision was twofold: that there should
be no commercial project in a public park in future. Second, that
CDA had favoured me and it was a non-transparent lease. Let's say
both of these are absolutely correct. Then how come Monal restaurant
opened in Margallah Hills after this decision? Wasn't that a commercial
project? What about Cinepax, Mcdonalds and Papasallis in Jinnah
Park-- a public park in Rawalpindi?
Second, if it was a non transparent lease, why wasn't I prosecuted?
Why wasn't I put behind bars? Why did they catch the thief and not
punish him? No one can answer these questions.
I even met the president after this happened, and was offered any
land I could put my finger on as compensation to me, because he
agreed that I had been wronged. But I refused to accept that on
the basis of principles. And I will still continue to fight, even
if I might only have a one percent chance.
Instep: Getting back to theatre, what do you say to people who regard
your work as purely commercial and assert that it has nothing to
do with pure art?
SS: See, this privileged class of ours normally sends its children
to study in foreign universities. Some of them have seen London
theatre or done theatre in America. They come to Pakistan and do
theatre here. Complete Flops. Here I am, a plain graduate, who gets
millions of sponsorships and jam-packed halls. In Lahore, my plays
have had lathi charges outside the hall, tickets are being sold
in black. They can't digest this. This privileged class thinks they
have a monopoly over intellectualism. But intellectual plays are
very easy to deliver. It is very dry. You don't need complicated
sets, lights, choreography or elaborate costumes. And I don't want
to be involved in that because I want to give laughter and pure
enjoyment to my audience. I want to give my sponsors a play that
is the talk of the town. I believe in creating packages. The plays
that I have brought here, like Moulin Rouge, Phantom of the Opera
and Bombay Dreams are plays that are still being reproduced in cities
like London and New York. So I don't see what is wrong in the kind
of theatre I am doing.
Instep: What's in your future now?
SS: Well, I'm 35 years old, and at 40 I will retire from business.
Then, like I said before, whenever something traumatic happens to
me, I try to bring something positive out of it. So after my experience,
I will get a degree in law. That is my latest resolution. And I
am also interested in doing a Masters in History in the future.
|
|
|