issue
The Diamir angle

The analysis on the killing of foreign tourists at Nanga Parbat Base Camp misses out on one important fact: how Diamir, a Sunni-Deobandi majority district situated in the Shia-Ismaili majority GB region, has been radicalised over the years
By Aoun Sahi
On June 23 at around 10:30pm, some 15-20 terrorists dressed in the uniforms of Gilgit Scouts climbed up to the Diamir base camp of Nanga Parbat. The camp is situated at a height of 13,000 feet above the sea level and is one of the most frequent routes for climbers to scale the Killer Mountain. Situated in Diamir district of Gilgit-Baltistan (GB), the track is very difficult and it takes at least two-days for professional climbers to reach the camp.

Tourism to terrorism
The incident no doubt has directly hit the tourism sector in Pakistan, especially high-altitude tourism in Gilgit-Baltistan. Between 250-300 teams of trekkers and 50-80 teams of mountaineers visit GB in the summer season. A team of trekkers usually consists of 15-20 people and spends 15-20 days and around 25,000USD. On the other hand, a team of mountaineers spends at least 60 days and 100,000USD. At least 250 locals are directly employed with one expedition.
The people in Buner valley through which the climbers travel to reach the base camp receive Rs100 million only as tourism royalty every year. Amjad Ayub, president of the Pakistan Tour Operators’ Association, tells TNS that this was the most promising season after 9/11 but the incident has ruined everything.

review
Of flags and other fallacies

In her ongoing show at Drawing Room art Gallery, Imrana Tanveer converts the form of flag in a comical way to reveal the reality behind the local and international play of power
By Quddus Mirza
On the Independence Day of Pakistan in 2002, novelist and social activist Arundhati Roy spoke to a large crowd in Lahore. To this mesmerised audience, the Booker Prize winner talked about the pomposity of patriotism, the false construct of nationalism and the practice of dividing human beings into countries, states and alliances that pitches the citizens against an imagined ‘Other’.
Seen through the eyes of the state, the Other becomes the enemy, hostile and alien; despite the fact that there may be more common elements than differences among two warring nations. For instance, Pakistan and India or Israel and Palestine have many linguistic and cultural similarities.

Thespian’s life
Father of modern Indian theatre Habib Tanvir’s rambling autobiography is well-translated into English
By Sarwat Ali
Habib Tanvir can be called the father of modern theatre in India. He drew his inspiration from the various folk forms that were being staged in the various languages of the subcontinent.
There was obviously a dilemma for the aspiring theatre enthusiasts in the subcontinent who did not want to continue with the heightened traditions associated with the Parsi Theatre and found the western theatre traditions too cold and alien to the Indian temperament. Very early on, he realised that the new Indian theatrical expression had to have links with the age-old folk traditions. It was only then that the people would connect with the thematic content of what was being presented on stage.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  issue
The Diamir angle
The analysis on the killing of foreign tourists at Nanga Parbat Base Camp misses out on one important fact: how Diamir, a Sunni-Deobandi majority district situated in the Shia-Ismaili majority GB region, has been radicalised over the years
By Aoun Sahi

On June 23 at around 10:30pm, some 15-20 terrorists dressed in the uniforms of Gilgit Scouts climbed up to the Diamir base camp of Nanga Parbat. The camp is situated at a height of 13,000 feet above the sea level and is one of the most frequent routes for climbers to scale the Killer Mountain. Situated in Diamir district of Gilgit-Baltistan (GB), the track is very difficult and it takes at least two-days for professional climbers to reach the camp.

The attackers, who were speaking local language Shina, Pashto and Urdu pulled out the nine foreign climbers belonging to US, China, Ukraine, Slovakia, Lithuania and Nepal, their guides, porters and cooks from their tents, tied their hands with rope and shot the foreigners. They then checked the ID cards of the locals and shot one local cook whose name, Ali Hassan, was Shia sounding.

                                                                                                                                                                                          
They spared all other locals including Sher Khan and two other Ismailies belonging to Hunza.
          
                                                                                                                                                                   
“They were in no hurry; they took their time. They snatched all the money from the foreigners and the locals, smashed all their communication gadgets and made sure everybody they shot was dead. They rose slogans that Allah is great and also in favour of Osama Bin Laden,” says Sher Khan, one of the local survivors, while talking to TNS. “Before leaving, the ‘leader’ delivered a brief sermon to the Pakistanis about the importance of Jihad and Qitaal.”

Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) took no time in claiming responsibility for the incident. “The Jundul Hafsa faction of the TTP has carried out the attack,” said the TTP spokesman Ehsanullah Ehsan, adding the attack was carried out to avenge the killing of their key leader Waliur Rehman Mehsud, and to express anger at the international community for its support to drone strikes.

The police have already identified the attackers and claim that 10 out of 15 including the mastermind Abdul Majeed belong to Diamir. It has so far arrested four of the accused.

A section of both mainstream and social media termed it another conspiracy against Pakistan to disturb its relations with China and prove it an unsafe country for tourists and climbers etc. and seem convinced that a foreign hand was involved. Locals in Diamir go further beyond and term it a conspiracy of international forces against the district to clear a path for a military operation in their area.

There may be some foreign hands involved in the incident but the local police in Diamir have not found a clue about it yet. “We have already arrested four out of 10 locals nominated and also arrested several others for investigations,” Muhammad Naveed, ASP Diamir tells TNS, adding that in the past incidents culprits were not identified. “But local jirga and people have been cooperating this time.”

The incident has widely been reported as the first such attack. This indeed is the first attack on altitude climbers but even worse attacks occurred in the recent past in the area. In April 2012, a charged crowd of hundreds in Diamir loaded off scores of Shia passengers bound for Skardu and Gilgit and killed almost 40 of them. A few months later, a group of terrorists killed 20 Shia bus passengers in an adjacent valley Lulusar.

The TTP claimed responsibility for the last incident which indicated its presence in the area.

There is a long history of sectarian animosity behind these attacks but the actual reasons are more entrenched.  Diamir is a Sunni-Deobandi majority district situated in the Shia-Ismaili majority GB region. The bigger Sunni-Deobandi region extends from Mansehra to Besham to Jaglot (Kohistan) which also connects with Swat. Historically, it has more linkages with Swat and Kohistan than GB. The areas are linked to each other not only through roads but also through complicated high-altitude tracks on the mountains.

A senior police official who has served in Diamir district for several years tells TNS there were some reports that the Taliban from Swat poured into Diamir. One of the most backward areas of Pakistan with less than 10 per cent literacy rate and a female literacy rate almost negligible at 0.02 percent, Diamir has a long history of association with jihadi organisations. In 2001, after the US attack on Afghanistan, the residents of Diamir closed Karakoram Highway for 11 days in protest and opened it only after Mufti Nizamuddin Shamzai personally visited the area and persuaded them to do so.

The same year the UNDP offices in two areas of Diamir-Darel and Tangir were burnt down. In October 2003, Pakistan’s security forces reportedly destroyed a training camp run by Harkat ul-mujahideen (HUM) in Diamir. In 2004, nine schools including seven girls’ schools were destroyed in the district on a single day. In 2009, the under-construction booster of PTV was destroyed in the district. In 2011, once again two girls’ schools were destroyed in the area. There were also some elements in Diamir which were involved in defacing and even destroying the ancient rocks carvings depicting Buddha images. The walls in the district are littered with sectarian graffiti and slogans.

The name of the central chowk in Chilas, district headquarters of Diamir, is Haq Nawaz Jhangvi. The most ironic part is that not even a single culprit involved in any kind of terrorist activity has been arrested in Diamir district.

Police officials in Diamir tell TNS that one nominated culprit in the killing of foreigners is a member of the local chapter of SSP. “It is a complete tribal area like Fata. People here are quite radicalised and opposed to modernity. They have strong links with militant and jihadi organisations active in the tribal areas of Pakistan. Diamir is also directly linked to Neelam valley of Kashmir. In fact, in the 1980s, almost all the youth of the area took jihadi training and took active part in the Kashmir and Afghanistan jihads.

“There were/are no plans to de-radiclise them. Mullahs are very influential in the area and the youth blindly follow them. There are hundreds of madrassas in the area while the number of schools is much less. The area is not going to change in the near future. A lot of efforts from all quarters are needed to bring the area into the mainstream,” says a senior official in Diamir.

Interestingly, the police and other law enforcement agencies (LEAs) are said to have been aware of presence of extremist and militant elements in Diamir but still did nothing to formulate a strategy to provide security to foreigners. Experts believe the LEAs need to formulate a pro-active strategy to counter terrorism in the country; so far they have been following a reactive strategy against terrorists and extremists.

Qazi Inayatullah, head of Diamir Aman Jirga and leader of JUI-F, believes that the incident is part of international conspiracy against his area. “The people of Diamir are religious-minded and if needed would be on the forefront to fight jihad. This incident is part of the plan to crush jihadi elements and to clear a way to launch a military operation in this area. There are dozens of graves of martyrs of Kashmir and Afghan jihadis in different areas of Diamir,” he says. “After the Swat operation, the Taliban tried to slip into our area but we requested them to leave our area alone and go somewhere else.”

Inayatullah clarified that in the April 2012 incident, “people of Diamir saved more than 200 Shia passengers belonging to Gilgit and Skardu. What is highlighted is the killing of people. That incident was a reaction of killings of Deaobandi people from Diamir in Gilgit.”

“No locals are involved in the killing of foreign climbers,” he says. But the next minute he tells TNS that families of four out of 10 locals identified by the police as attackers have told the jirga that their sons are not in their control. “They have linkages with jihadi organisations and do not listen to their families. They may have been used by some anti-Pakistan group. We have already decided to make a list of such young people and then we would also contact the Taliban leadership and request them that do use these young men of Diamir in Afghanistan war but please do not use them in our area. It is a very sensitive area and such activities create a lot of problems. If they do not listen to us, we would cooperate with the government to take action against them.”

 

 

 

 

Tourism to terrorism

The incident no doubt has directly hit the tourism sector in Pakistan, especially high-altitude tourism in Gilgit-Baltistan. Between 250-300 teams of trekkers and 50-80 teams of mountaineers visit GB in the summer season. A team of trekkers usually consists of 15-20 people and spends 15-20 days and around 25,000USD. On the other hand, a team of mountaineers spends at least 60 days and 100,000USD. At least 250 locals are directly employed with one expedition.

The people in Buner valley through which the climbers travel to reach the base camp receive Rs100 million only as tourism royalty every year. Amjad Ayub, president of the Pakistan Tour Operators’ Association, tells TNS that this was the most promising season after 9/11 but the incident has ruined everything.

“Over 70 per cent reservations have already been cancelled,” he says, adding that a Japan-based company which used to deal in ‘Pakistan only tourists’ has already gone bankrupt after the incident.

Ghulam Nabi, owner of the Fairy Meadow Tours, tells TNS that more than 500 tourists, mostly locals, were visiting Fairy Meadows this year before the incident. “95 per cent of all bookings have been cancelled. All 250 families in the Fairy Meadows area depend on tourism.”

He terms the government more responsible for the damage than the terrorists. “The post-incident handling by the government was poor. It did not allow the tourists to cross Chilas and Babusar Pass. Hundreds were stranded there for hours and there was nobody to guide them. No senior government official showed up at Chilas. They took it as a normal incident.”

Nabi says Diamir is not on the priority list of rulers in GB. They instead try to isolate the area from the rest of the region. “This has provided opportunities to religious fundamentalist organisations like Sipah-e-Sihaba Pakistan (SSP) and intelligence agencies of our enemy countries to increase their influence in the area.”

He says the current incident may have been a foreign conspiracy against his area but definitely done with the help of locals. “The pathway to the base camp is so complicated that nobody without the help of locals could reach there,” he says, adding that since 1998 scores of incidents of sectarian violence and terrorism have taken place in GB but the government has not arrested even a single culprit to date.

— A Sahi

   

 

review
Of flags and other fallacies
In her ongoing show at Drawing Room art Gallery, Imrana Tanveer converts the form of flag in a comical way to reveal the reality behind the local and international play of power
By Quddus Mirza

On the Independence Day of Pakistan in 2002, novelist and social activist Arundhati Roy spoke to a large crowd in Lahore. To this mesmerised audience, the Booker Prize winner talked about the pomposity of patriotism, the false construct of nationalism and the practice of dividing human beings into countries, states and alliances that pitches the citizens against an imagined ‘Other’.

Seen through the eyes of the state, the Other becomes the enemy, hostile and alien; despite the fact that there may be more common elements than differences among two warring nations. For instance, Pakistan and India or Israel and Palestine have many linguistic and cultural similarities.

States in their attempts to keep their individual and distinct identities rely on a number of symbols; like the national map, which is regarded a sacred demarcation of boundary but is nothing more than a result of decisions made by a few leaders and groups. In fact the idea of fixed borders is a modern concept; during the medieval and ancient times, territories were altered with each new expedition and invasion.

Another symbol of nationalism, the country flag, is a sacred item which commands such power and prestige and respect that to rip, burn or drag it is considered a criminal offense. Without realising that a piece of fabric in two or more colours and with some patterns or motifs is designed by some humans and then the state decrees it to be its national emblem, which can be modified with the consent of the majority; hence the change in the national flags of Afghanistan, Iran and Libya with the shift in regimes.

Artists have been looking at this aspect of our existence in their works; many from diverse backgrounds have used flags to denote more than one theme. Perhaps the most prominent among them is Jasper Johns with his variations on the US flag (and map too). Instead of political content, his flag and map painting are more about the flatness of surface and choosing ready-made flat images for the sake of painting (Other Criteria, Leo Steinberg). Alighiero e Boetti in his  Map, 1971-89, created the world map, while indicating each country with its national flag. Another artist, Yukinori Yanagi, constructed an installation (The World Flag Ant Farm,   1990-91) for 1993 Venice Biennale, in which national flags of different countries were made with coloured sand stored in 170 plastic boxes connected with each other through transparent tubes of the same material. The artist inserted ants in this structure which moved the coloured sand from one box to the other through tiny tunnels. After a few days, flags of all countries blended with each other, to the extent of turning into discoloured collection of sand at the end.

During the Sharjah Biennale 2013, Sara Rahbar also picked the image of national flags and fabricated large scale pieces which were a critique/comment upon these signs of identities and conflicts. Imrana Tanveer’s work falls in the same league. Here, the artist has manipulated the visual of Pakistani flag along with the flags of local parties and portraits of political personalities.

In a series of small pieces, intricately-formed like traditional textile, Tanveer shows (at her solo exhibition being held from July 1-August 10, 2013, at the Drawing Room Gallery, Lahore) how she responds to the surrounding political scenario. She has picked the simple image of green and white flag and has introduced a range of elements which reflect her ideas as well indicate the current situation.

In a combination of 40 pieces (each titled   Road Always Taken), the form of flag is converted to reveal the reality behind the local and international play of power. Among these, the most representative and obvious is the Pakistani flag in which the star is dragged away through a small drone that leaves its smoke line crossing the crescent. In another piece from the same group, little bombs are placed in a grid on green fabric, and are all white except one red (almost about to explode!). In a similar construction, the stars are put on the green portion with the face of General Zia ul Haq in the middle, and composed inside a circle.

These works unfold how the artist is keen on investigating the real reasons for the malice of our nation. Due to her work, it appears that army’s intervention in the political setup has been the main cause of our critical condition, but the content is conveyed in a comical manner (and thank God for that because there is nothing worse than a visual artist trying to be a political performer/reformer or strategic analyst!).

In another work,Golden Moustaches, Tanveer alludes to the rule of Zia ul Haq, with his moustaches sitting prominently on a surface which resembles an indigenous rug. The artist, quite cleverly, colours the hair in the pattern of camouflage from the army uniform; thus invoking the historical role of army which is further illustrated through two rifles placed side by side as if two outstretched arms are drawn against a neutral backdrop.

The artist does not contain her content to these images; she experiments with a range of pictorial stuff and tries to create humour, irony and interest in our grim situation. In that, she heavily relies on the history of visuals or history of art; thus, in one work, the famous Andy Warhol multiple portraits of Mao Zedong is arranged next to an identical composition with each panel consisting of a political leader and a splash of red on his/her face. This suggests the presence of violence or it may refer to allegations of corruption that have disfigured the character of our political leaders.

All these works — with President Obama’s electrical poster, scenes of people pushing a train, Uncle Sam’s figure in a frame with other smaller sections, our newly elected prime minister wearing yellow glasses next to Edvard Munch’s painting      The Scream,  and Hokusai’s well known print of weave in a mirror image — demonstrate how the artist approaches her ideas and pictorial matter with a sense of suspicion. These indicate that, for her, the work is a means to search and navigate the essence of our political problem/existence.

This, along with her experiments with form, is a positive sign and proves that Imrana Tanveer is a searching soul, especially in a time and place where everyone is a self-proclaimed political scientist, regardless of the fact that s/he is sitting at a road side café, in a posh restaurant or on a news channels providing great entertainment to his audience, which Art used to once upon a time!

 

 

 

 



 

 

Thespian’s life
Father of modern Indian theatre Habib Tanvir’s rambling autobiography is well-translated into English
By Sarwat Ali

Habib Tanvir can be called the father of modern theatre in India. He drew his inspiration from the various folk forms that were being staged in the various languages of the subcontinent.

There was obviously a dilemma for the aspiring theatre enthusiasts in the subcontinent who did not want to continue with the heightened traditions associated with the Parsi Theatre and found the western theatre traditions too cold and alien to the Indian temperament. Very early on, he realised that the new Indian theatrical expression had to have links with the age-old folk traditions. It was only then that the people would connect with the thematic content of what was being presented on stage.

A rambling autobiography, Memoirs covers not only the professional life of the thespian but also meanders into nooks and corners very personal in nature. His various crushes, infatuations, the temptations of youth and then his more serious involvements, numbering more than one, are very quaintly delineated. He talks about his large family, the various members in total recall, so typical of the extended family scenario of the Muslim household in the subcontinent.

Habib Tanvir came to Pakistan on many occasions; in the beginning, just to see his relatives, and later as a celebrity. His extended family had migrated to the new country in 1947. Like many Indian Muslims, his family too was divided. He refused to migrate to Pakistan and preferred to stay in India along with many of his friends who were progressive poets, writers and film and theatre personnel.

Not a very good student, he dropped out of Aligarh and then the Royal Academy of Dramatics Arts in London but came back to take up theatre as his career in fulfillment to a promise he had made to Qudsia Zaidi before proceeding to London. It was only the personal intercession by Jawalharlal Nehru on the strong recommendation of Abul Kalam Azad that his name was cleared. The communists were not that easily allowed then to travel abroad but he came back after seeing a lot of theatre in Europe.

The bug of theatre had bitten him as a child in his native Raipur. His father was a Pathan who settled in Raipur, then the capital of Central Province, later Madhya Pardesh and now Chhattisgarh. He saw performances of song and dance on important occasions. He worked for the Radio and earned the respect of Z.A. Bukhari and later joined the Indian Peoples Theatre Association in about mid-1940s.

His hands-on exposure to theatre served him well for he worked closely with Balraj Sahni, Shalendre, Khawaja Ahmed Abbas, and Prithviraj Kapoor in the days when it was agitprop theatre at its energetic best. When the top leadership of the Communist Party was arrested, including the leading lights of IPTA, in the late 1940s and early ’50s, Habib Tanvir ran the outfit single-handedly for about a couple of years. 

Beyond IPTA, the theatre scene was bleak. Ebrahim Elkazi did English plays in Bombay and the rest of the theatre was conducted at the amateur level in schools and colleges. Post independence theatre in India was dominated by Utpal Dutt and Shambu Misra from Bengal who were both IPTA-trained and brought in modern techniques. Though they performed in villages, it was basically urban theatre; Elkazi and the National School of Drama productions were mainly based on western theatre techniques but this interaction ushered in new playwrights like Vijay Tandulkar, Grish Karnard, Mohan Rakesh and Badal Sircar.

When Habib Tanvir decided to do a play on Nazeer Akbarabadi in Jamia Millia, Delhi, in the mid-1950s, it was as if theatre was given a new lease of life. In this play, even some of the actors were not trained but were picked up from the adjoining village of Okhala. Since Nazeer as a poet went contrary to the courtly mainstream tradition of high culture song and dance, it was as if a reconnection with folk India. It is difficult to characterise Agra Bazaar as a play — it was at once a play that belonged to the proscenium as it did to the bazaar, a modern narrative as well as a traditional one, a complete story as well as an allegory; its use of song and dance seemed to take it away from modern plays.

When he used Chhattisgrahi folk actors in Mitti Ki Garhi the attempted departure was audacious. Until then, the city dwellers had taken their productions to the rural areas. For the first time, he brought rural actors to the urban stage, not as exotica but as equal participants. He also displayed that the secret of Sanskrit theatre heritage lay via its folk heritage. The latter was a radical idea and his productions were attacked for putting a shastriya tradition into lokadharmi casing. It was a huge success and helped him form the Naya Theatre.

For thirty years, he and his wife worked tirelessly for Naya Theatre, mounting productions, and performing in different spaces. When Peter Brooks came to India in 1981, he preferred Naya Theatre over the National School of Drama and its production Charandas Chor created a storm winning the Edinburgh Fringe First Play Award.

Once he was particularly invited to bring his famous stage play Agra Bazaar to Pakistan during the first Benazir Bhutto government. He came on a recce trip but unfortunately it was not possible for him to bring his play to Pakistan due to the angry reaction of certain sections of the population. He did talk to the audiences and the concerned people about his experiences of theatre and the need to engage with a live art form. He was very keen to get the texts of the Parsi stage plays which had been compiled and edited by Imtiaz Ali Taj while he was heading the Anjuman Tarraqi-e-Urdu in Lahore. He admitted that such a work had not been done in India. His wife of many years Moneeka Di too came with him and was very eager to see visit Kinnaird College where she had been a student before partition.

The Memoir has been translated by Mahmood Farooqui who is the spirit behind the revival of dastangoi in India. He also co directed the acclaimed film Peepli Live with Anusha Rizvi. His “Besieged Voices from Delhi in 1857” was also well-received.

(Memoirs is available at Liberty Books)

Habib Tanvir Memoirs

Translated from Urdu by Mahmood Farooqui

Penguin Vikings India 2013

Pages: 343

Price not mentioned

 

 

 

 

   

 

|Home|Daily Jang|The News|Sales & Advt|Contact Us|

 


BACK ISSUES