tribute
Revolutionary resolve Perween
Rahman had a capacity to pick up on the potential of people, and believe in them until they had no choice but to believe in themselves
By Rabia Ezdi
It is a natural human instinct to celebrate those that leave us. But a tribute to Perween Rahman is like sharing some of the stuff that real legends are made of. Not the people of big awards and media coverage, but those that make change on the ground while shunning publicity; the true heroes of Pakistan.

politics
Rulers and Pirs
What compelled Prime Minister Pervaiz Ashraf to visit Ajmer Sharif at a 
crucial time when his presence was most wanted in the country?
Alauddin Masood
It has become a tradition with most of the holders of top public slots in Pakistan to visit foreign lands to pay homage, in person, to saints buried there. For instance, on March 9, 2013, our Gujar Khan-born and Sangarh-bred prime minister went to India, on a private visit, to pay homage to Sufi saint Hazrat Moinuddin Chishti, whose shrine is located in Ajmer Sharif. The saint is popularly called Khwaja Gharib Nawaz and his 13th century mausoleum is 130 km from Jaipur, capital of the northern India desert state of Rajasthan.

Can private sector mitigate conflicts?
In a recent study, large percentages of respondents think that lack of social services and employment opportunities are issues contributing to conflicts in Pakistan
By Dr Vaqar Ahmed and Safwan A. Khan
The phrase ‘from Karachi to Khyber’ appears to have taken a different connotation. While the phrase was earlier used to describe the richness of the land of sacred souls, it now reflects the breadth of bloodbath across the country. Are we really heading backwards to an age of barbarianism? There could be several explanations to the question of why the country seems to be in a perennial state of conflicts. However, the answers to the question may not be that difficult after all.

talks
Dandy diplomacy
The situation seems to be extreme on both ends on the issue of talks with the taliban
By Arbab Daud
9/11 was a defining moment in the global history. The event not only changed definitions of many issues but also evolved some new concepts for the world. At that point of time, it was a unanimous decision by most of the developed world that Islamic extremism is the root-cause of all the worldly ills and that is why it should be wiped off the face of the earth in order to make this planet livable. Most importantly, the actions against the perpetrators was planned to be precise, well-coordinated and swift. 

Solving the water problem
While there are many hurdles, there is no technical or economic reason as to why all Karachiites cannot have access to clean water 
By Professor Asit K. Biswas and Asif Mehmood
Karachi is in turmoil. But it’s the crisis of urban order that always hits the headlines and not its water woes.  While the water organisations continue to struggle and Karachiites suffer on the issue, any plausible solution is far from the sight. 

Free education under 25-A
PML-Q wants to build on the success of Parha Likha Punjab and take it further
By Shahzada Irfan Ahmed
With elections round the corner, it’s a pleasant surprise to see parties stressing a lot on importance of education in their manifestos and campaign material. 
Pakistan Muslim League-Q is one such party which claims it gives education sector number one priority in its manifesto and terms it “central to building a modern developed society.” The party showcases the “Parha Likha Punjab” project executed by former Punjab chief minister Pervaiz Ilahi as a role model and intends to replicate it all over the country. 

Islands of prospects
The plan of constructing modern islands off the coast of Karachi 
has its pros and cons
By Naseer Memon
According to newspaper reports, real estate tycoon Malik Riaz’s Bahria Town and a US investment group signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) for $15 to 20 billion investment on March 11.
Under the project, Bahria Town, in collaboration with foreign companies associated with prominent US investor Thomas Kramer, would construct the world’s tallest building and a number of other projects some 3.5 kilometres off the Karachi shore. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

tribute
Revolutionary resolve Perween 
Rahman had a capacity to pick up on the potential of people, and believe in them until they had no choice but to believe in themselves
By Rabia Ezdi

It is a natural human instinct to celebrate those that leave us. But a tribute to Perween Rahman is like sharing some of the stuff that real legends are made of. Not the people of big awards and media coverage, but those that make change on the ground while shunning publicity; the true heroes of Pakistan.

I first met Perween eleven years ago. After being disillusioned by the role of mainstream architects in making the kind of change that was needed in our cities, I had decided to plunge into the NGO sector. The replication of the OPP (Orangi Pilot Project) model in Punjab had begun, adding to its recognition as a development alternative with much promise. I expected Perween to be the proverbial ‘NGO-type’: scary, aggressive, intimidating. She was none of these. With a warm smile, a chirpy voice, and a kind demeanour, she welcomed me to the OPP-RTI (Orangi Pilot Project-Research and Training Institute) and told me that I should spend the first two weeks just trying to understand the work of the organisation.

OPP was at the time and still is, running on the momentum of Dr Akhtar Hamid Khan’s teachings; simplicity, frugality, and the ideals of love and humanity. Two of the first of Dr Sahib’s axioms I was told I must remember were: “I made a mistake”, and “I have not understood”. Being used to an academic and professional world where flaunting one’s knowledge, talking more than listening, and proving one’s point often in heavy jargon, were characteristic of ‘strong’ professionals — this new ethos was most liberating, and one of the things that made me fall instantly for the OPP’s development philosophy.

Anyone interested in being a part of this most beautiful process of true, rooted change, could just sit back, listen, observe, and internalise when ready. There was no room for ego. Also, where mainstream development work is about ‘doing’ for the poor, this was about learning from the poor, and supporting their initiatives with whatever know-how is appropriate, from technical input, to maps and training. It was the self-help model, committed to bringing human dignity back into the formula of helping the poor help themselves.

It was this that I learnt most from Perween and those at OPP: working for ‘real’ development is, more than anything else, a spiritual discipline.

On the operational side of the organisation, there was the weekly Monday meeting. In appearance just a tedious reporting of the week’s progress by every OPP-RTI team member including Perween herself, in reality it is an exceptional tool for accountability, transparency, and inclusive decision-making. It was the platform for debate, disagreement, acknowledgement of failures, and a celebration of small and big successes.

In work ethic, Perween was a disciplinarian and this had trickled down to all members of the institution. Work was the temple, the worship; there was no compromise. While she was gentle, she was as firm and upright as the trunk of an oak tree. The OPP-RTI research objective was clear: advocacy for the poor. The methodology was simple — interview, mapping, writing, and dissemination.

And then there was Perween’s insistence on using the right words; “It is the terms we use that shape our biases towards the poor,” she would say. Perween was not opposed to the city’s ‘mafias’ any more than she was saddened by the government’s indifference in solving the problems of the poor. She had come to realise that the term ‘mafia’ is misleading; in a system that is not fair by its very nature, and where the majority has no choice but to fend for themselves, a ‘mafia’ was simply an opportunist’s response in a crisis.

The word ‘katchi abadi’ she would say, leads to an automatic anti-poor prejudice. It was merely ‘People’s Housing’, “They are people who have found no alternative and this reflects the failure of the government to       absorb them”. And ‘informal settlements’? Perween had concluded that there is no such thing; it was simply that which was ‘unofficial’ planning, unofficially supplied services, and unofficial systems, versus what was ‘officially’ done and recognised. And it was these ‘unofficial’ systems that existed often in collusion with the government, and supported the lives of 70 per cent of the city’s population, hence the need to recognise and understand them.

Perween was high on life. Along with countless people from community-based organisations in Sindh and Punjab, we travelled across the country several times a year, trying to understand and support poor people’s initiatives. Travel was not just business; while the tone was always jovial, it was above all an opportunity to make connections and give people hope. It is this people-building that was the real and lasting investment. Perween had a capacity to pick up on the potential of people, and believe in them until they had no choice but to believe in themselves. She would instil idealism, humane values, and a work ethic without overtly ‘preaching’. She was that rare combination of mentor and friend.

Perween was not the change itself, she was one of change’s most potent agents — the faith of change, the brain behind change. In her inside-out understanding of the city’s ways, and in the networks and relationships with government and communities that she had forged over the years, Perween had crystallised a movement of sorts, where the marginalised were shown ways in which they would really no longer be the city’s ‘Citizen X’. And it is always the true change-makers of the world that shake the hold of those who live only to maintain a ruthless status quo.

Many theories abound about who would want to so heinously rob this gentle soul of her life, this soul that couldn’t hurt an ant. The truth is simply that in the years since she first joined OPP, Perween had quietly grown and come to a point where she could move mountains. The OPP’s ground-breaking low-cost sanitation model, and the upgrading of housing in Orangi, were the primers. The Karachi master plan for the conversion of Karachi’s open nallahs into box culverts was achieved through an arduous process of lobbying with the KWSB. Research into the truth about Karachi’s water crisis, and unearthing water ‘thefts’ was geared by the OPP.

The 2006 floods in Karachi and their connection with the choking of Karachi’s storm-water nallahs due to encroachments by government and private interests alike, was investigated by the OPP. And now the Secure Housing Initiative, wherein it was discovered that pre-partition villages or Goths in Karachi’s peripheral areas, were being evicted by political interests in order to create new constituencies for political parties. Where the government’s figures recognised these goths to be 400 in number, through research the OPP-RTI discovered that there were more than 2000. The OPP-RTI had entered into a process of mapping these goths, and supporting goth dwellers to advocate for land title.

In 2010, these maps helped convince the government to issue land titles to over half of those communities. Now, by 2013, more land titles were on their way. “The maps did it. Maps help to build relationships,” she would say, “The maps tell us what to do, where to go, who to lobby. They help professionals to understand the reality and have the courage to accept it. They help government to understand the reality and accept it too, because they are no longer the only ones that have that information. The people have this information now, and the NGOs and media have it too.” Most of these maps of the goth settlements have now been accepted as official government maps. “It is the community youth who actually do the mapping. We only help train them, and then take a back seat, become invisible.”

Despite negativity and despair all around, with the youthful spirit of a sixteen-year-old, Perween never stopped being an incurable optimist.

In a presentation she made in Bangkok in February at a meeting of community-based organisations from Asia, Perween’s words are the only solace one finds in the midst of this painful turn of events: “Today Karachi is in flames, and one of the aspects of the violence in the city is the politics of land and who gets title to it. Getting land title for these goth settlers, who have lived there since long before partition in 1947, has been a very powerful step forward for the peace and the political balance of Karachi. We were just saying amongst ourselves that if we die today, we will die so happily, because we have done it.”

This was Perween Rahman. With the childlike vivacity of a fluttering bird, the resolve of a revolutionary, and the magnanimity of a sage, this gentle soul had helped to change the map of Karachi.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

politics
Rulers and Pirs
What compelled Prime Minister Pervaiz Ashraf to visit Ajmer Sharif at a 
crucial time when his presence was most wanted in the country?
Alauddin Masood

It has become a tradition with most of the holders of top public slots in Pakistan to visit foreign lands to pay homage, in person, to saints buried there. For instance, on March 9, 2013, our Gujar Khan-born and Sangarh-bred prime minister went to India, on a private visit, to pay homage to Sufi saint Hazrat Moinuddin Chishti, whose shrine is located in Ajmer Sharif. The saint is popularly called Khwaja Gharib Nawaz and his 13th century mausoleum is 130 km from Jaipur, capital of the northern India desert state of Rajasthan.

Pakistan’s first woman prime minister, Benazir Bhutto, would also visit shrines or call on various Pirs for their blessings. She reportedly called on Pir Dhanka in Hazara, who patted her with his traditional stick to administer the blessings. The helmsman of one of the two mainstream political parties, it is said, sets his daily routine in consultation with a revered personality, who reportedly advised him, some time back, to remain away from the mountainous arid lands and the top man remained put near the coastal and sandy terrains throughout the period indicated by his peer. Former prime minister Junejo held Pir Pagara in high esteem. He would walk bare boot while going for audience with his mentor and would not turn his back towards the Pir while tracing his steps back.

Prime Minister Raja Pervaiz Ashraf and his entourage of 28 persons, mostly his relatives or servants, spent half an hour at Hazrat Moinuddin Chishti’s shrine, a popular place of pilgrimage by the Muslims from all over the South Asia Subcontinent. We hope that the expenses on this private visit would be borne by the prime minister himself and not by the state of Pakistan, which is already heavily indebted due to constant plundering and wastage of public money. He would do well to emulate the noble examples set by some of his predecessors of pre-1958 era, like Chaudhry Muhammad Ali, who had resigned as prime minister of his own free will and without any external pressure.

In Shahab Nama (pages 694-695),.Qudratullah Shahab writes: At one point, after stepping down it became imperative for Chaudhry Muhammad Ali to travel abroad for medical treatment. But, he lacked the required sources. President Iskander Mirza visited Chaudhry Muhammad Ali to convince him to accept treatment abroad on government expense. The ailing former prime minister thanked the president and said; “I have been receiving full compensation in return of whatever services I have been performing for Pakistan. I do not want to be a burden on the public exchequer.” On the president’s insistence, Chaudhry Muhammad Ali agreed to take a loan of Rs20,000, which he returned in a few installments later on.

However, we presume that there must be some compelling reason for the prime minister to leave the country for this pilgrimage at a crucial time when his presence was most wanted in the country. Perhaps, it was an exercise in ‘peace diplomacy!’ We can deduce this conclusion from the impressions that the prime minister recorded, in Urdu, in the visitors’ book kept at the shrine of Khawaja Gharib Nawaz. He wrote: “I wish for peace in the world and for peace and prosperity in Pakistan.”

The third most sacred temple of the Hindus is located at Raj Katas in Chakwal, but so far no holder of top public slot in India has ever visited that place. The only exception was Sindh-born Advani, who came over for pilgrimage to the place when he was no longer the deputy prime minister of his country. In other words, Advani visited Raj Katas purely as a private citizen. That remains the case with the Hindu politicians of our neighbouring country. India’s incumbent prime minister, Dr Manmohan Singh had a burning desire to visit his birthplace in Chakwal, but he did not like to come to Pakistan unless tangible results could be achieved during his visit. But, carefree Pakistani leaders are carried away by passions, and think little about results or outcome of their visits, whether public or private.

According to the teachings of Islam, one can offer Fateha for the departed souls from any corner of the globe and a visit in person to the shrines/graves of the deceased is not mandatory. In the past, the abodes of saints were centres of learning and the people would visit them, from far and wide, for acquiring knowledge about the teachings of Islam and/or to seek guidance from the scholarly/saintly figures about prudently managing worldly affairs. Abbaside Caliph Haroon-ur-Rashid paid a visit to an eminent Sufi saint of his time, Shaqiq Bulkhi, to seek guidance for better governance.

On arrival, Bulkhi entertained the emperor with a glass of water. Later, he enquired from the monarch that if he happened to be all alone in a far away desert where there was no trace of water within miles, and he felt acute thirst and believed that it could prove fatal, what would he do? The Caliph replied: He would give one-half of his empire for a glass of water. Later, the Sufi asked the emperor that if he could not urinate and on that count felt unbearable pain which could result in his death, what would he do in such a situation? Haroon-ur-Rashid said that he would give one-half of his state to anyone who could relieve him from the agony. Bulkhi said: This shows that the intrinsic or real worth of your entire kingdom was not more than a glass of water. Therefore, you should never feel proud on that count.

Bulkhi said: “Allah has given you (Haroon-ur-Rashid) the mantle of Hazrat Abu Bakar Siddique and He wants you to rule with justice. God has given you the power bastion which was once held by Hazrat Omar, and He wants you to distinguish between the right and the wrong. The Almighty has bequeathed to you Hazrat Osman’s lofty position and He wants you to be benevolent. The Creator has entrusted to you the top-most mantle, which was once held by Hazrat Ali, and He wants you to be the embodiment of knowledge, and to rule with justice.”

Continuing, Bulkhi said: “A ruler was like a spring of water and the state officials like channels sprouting from that spring. If the spring — the source of the water — becomes polluted how could there be pure and sweet water in the canals flowing out of it?”

According to a legend, Mughal emperor Shah Jehan, along with his sons, paid a call on a revered saint of his times, Mian Mir, to seek the saint’s advice about division of his vast empire among the four princes. During the meeting, the saint made four equal pieces of bread (Roti) and gave one piece each to the princes. But, the three princes — Dara Shakuh, Shuja and Murad — handed on their share of bread to Aurangzeb, who ate all the four pieces amidst taunts of his brothers. When Emperor Shah Jehan reminded the saint about the purpose of his visit, the saint replied that he had divided the empire equally among all the four princes, but the three of them handed over their share to Aurangzeb, who is destined to succeed the Delhi throne.

We wish our rulers to approach their Pirs with the request to bless them to rule with vision, sagacity and honesty and not merely bless them with continuing to occupying their coveted positions only.

Alauddin Masood is a freelance columnist based in Islamabad.

E-mail:alauddinmasood@gmail.com

 

 

 

 

 

Can private sector mitigate conflicts?
In a recent study, large percentages of respondents think that lack of social services and employment opportunities are issues contributing to conflicts in Pakistan
By Dr Vaqar Ahmed and Safwan A. Khan

The phrase ‘from Karachi to Khyber’ appears to have taken a different connotation. While the phrase was earlier used to describe the richness of the land of sacred souls, it now reflects the breadth of bloodbath across the country. Are we really heading backwards to an age of barbarianism? There could be several explanations to the question of why the country seems to be in a perennial state of conflicts. However, the answers to the question may not be that difficult after all.

A study conducted by the Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) sought to answer this question, focusing specifically on the role of the private sector in mitigating conflicts in the country. With a rich household-level survey across Pakistan, the study sheds light on community perceptions about the role of businesses with regards to mitigating peace.

Significantly, large percentages of respondents think that lack of social services and lack of employment opportunities are issues contributing to conflicts in the country. A large percentage of respondents (48 per cent) think that lack of basic necessities such as water and other utilities are also contributing to conflicts. The study shows that lack of social services, unemployment, and high cost of living are some of the most cited issues confronting the Pakistani society (note that two these issues are also the most cited ones as contributing to conflicts in the country, as mentioned before).

Even though most respondents (over 93 per cent) think that business expansion is beneficial for communities, a high percentage agrees to the idea of businesses’ involvement in local area development. Again, lack of employment, lack of energy and other utilities, and lack of social services are considered by most respondents as issues where private sector can help.

An interesting finding from the study is the response to ‘factors preventing business engagement in peace-building’. Responses widely varied, covering issues such as lack of legislation, corruption, political resistance and risks to business, among others. It is important to note, however, that even though these issues may prevent proactive peace measures on part of businesses, partnerships with influential rent-seeking groups are also incompatible with a peaceful environment in the longer run.

So what are the lessons to be learnt, and demands made, before we caste our votes later this year. And what should be the lessons for those now shouting slogans to come into power? Regardless of the structure of power, strategic peace in the country demands participation from all stakeholders in the conflict milieu. The study by SDPI identifies three broad sets of stakeholders, and proposes recommendations along the following lines.

Public Sector: Strong business does not always entail a strong private sector. There could be a leader in a certain market with flourishing business (since it enjoys a large market share), while market barriers prevent entry of other businesses. This implies a weak private sector despite strong businesses. On the other hand, the influence of regulatory bodies to enforce compliance even of existing laws appears to be very weak.

A weak private sector in the country coupled with a weak regulatory structure provides perfect opportunity for a middle ground between two contesting schools of thought that advocate for strengthening one against the other. While the private sector needs to be strengthened by opening up markets and allowing a fair and competitive business environment, it is equally important to strengthen the regulatory structure that also ensures inclusive business practices. These include ensuring local employment and strict compliance to regulations, such as the Environmental Protection Act.

Opening up markets may incentivise formalisation of informal businesses and would also create opportunities for small and medium enterprises to become active players in the economy. Parallel development of markets and regulatory structure may ultimately lead to peaceful as well as sustainable economies.

Businesses: A more strategic approach towards inclusive communities on part of large businesses could be to include local small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in their supply-chains. Doing so can also help formalize many operating informally at the local level and fits well with the argument on strengthening the private sector as mentioned above.

Businesses also need to take note of the failure of social service delivery wherever they operate. A useful approach to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in that context could be to institutionalize development programs within the business model. For example, the Hashoo Group of Companies has established and funds the Hashoo Foundation, an NGO actively working on various development themes. The Hashoo Foundation is to a large extent self-sustainable and not vulnerable to availability of funds from international donors.

Communities and the Civil Society: The civil society networks provide an excellent platform for organizing communities. Civil society organizations (CSO) not only work on different thematic areas of development but also provide a channel for community interface across a wide range of actors including government and businesses. Communities at the local level may have to be more acceptable of CSOs in so far as their inclusion in societal issues is concerned.

Community-led organizations and associations, in turn, should work to make themselves sustainable. For example, ExtraCorp, a project of the School of Leadership Foundation (SOLF) in Karachi, provides vocational and managerial training to people with disability. Their trainees work as a small enterprise producing handicrafts. ExtraCorp now generates enough business on its own, creating livelihoods for those with disabilities.

Our private sector also needs to innovate its role towards promotion of peace in the country. We have examples from other conflict prone countries such as Sri Lanka, Nepal and Philippines where private sector played a crucial role for a sustained time period in bringing down the intensity of conflict through promotion of CSR, employment and livelihood opportunities at the local level. It is also time now that our Chambers of Commerce and Pakistan Business Council look into such initiatives.

The authors are Economists at Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

talks
Dandy diplomacy
The situation seems to be extreme on both ends on the issue of talks with the taliban
By Arbab Daud

9/11 was a defining moment in the global history. The event not only changed definitions of many issues but also evolved some new concepts for the world. At that point of time, it was a unanimous decision by most of the developed world that Islamic extremism is the root-cause of all the worldly ills and that is why it should be wiped off the face of the earth in order to make this planet livable. Most importantly, the actions against the perpetrators was planned to be precise, well-coordinated and swift.

The initial practice of smoking out and bombing the “newly-defined evil” seemed to be working well and was supposed to last till the achievement of the goal. Out of nowhere, someone or something intervened to stop bombing and the process of rehabilitation and reconstruction started.

The shift in strategy enabled the extremists to re-group, chisel out their strategy and retaliate ferociously. Their attacks dripped through at the outset, streamed gradually and gushed at the close to push the aggressive force on back foot. This resulted in a shift of perspective as well. The developed world then tried to declare that there are good and bad amongst the evil or in other words “lesser of the two evils.”

Whether through a meager happenstance or a well thought out design the global financial crises came to the fore at the time when the world needed funds for its important war on terror. The crises clipped the wings of many partners in the “coalition of willing” and thus started another change in plan i.e. pull out. At this point in time, the options of the western powers started expanding and thus an idea was coined that diplomacy is also an option to deal with only “good” extremists. Still the most suitable option seemed gunboat diplomacy.

Needless to mention, that the developing world might fail in original thinking but always succeed in imitating the masters. Now we can see many people who have started running from pillar to post to bring the Taliban to a talking table. Some offer themselves as guarantors while others offer their services as negotiators. However, the genius acts in silence.

To look into the issue in greater detail, we first need to look at what actually the extremists want? And to answer this question, a rocket-scientist is not needed. The extremists want to implement a hard-core religious system based completely on the principles of self-defined Sharia. The rule of law must be based on religious framework and its implementation must be ensured through brute force.

As per our learning from the rule of extremists in our neighbouring country in the past, we saw that for all men growing of beard was an imperative. Women were required not to come out of their homes alone and must be accompanied by a Mehram. Women when going out of home must wear a Burqa or in other words they have to hide themselves from head to toe.

A special police unit was formed by the name “Amr bil Maroof wa nahi anil Munkar” to enforce the religious practices like five time prayers, dressing code, ethical code of religion, length of beard etc. The force will capture the non-follower on spot, hold a trial within seconds and do the execution abruptly as well. The non-followers of the code were supposed to be electrified, but in the absence of electricity, the cables were used to inflict corporal punishments on the culprits. Most importantly, the governance system selected by the extremists was Khilafa and not the democratic way of government. Democracy was and still is regarded as a load of hogwash propagated by the heathenish west and denounced categorically.

In short, the working style of the extremists was predominantly converged on the saying “it’s my way or highway.” However, after a show of force by the western forces through fire-breathing flying metallic dragons nicknamed drone predators, and spending a long time in caves and mountains the extremists have agreed to come to a talking table for straightening out the issues.

On the other hand, our leaders are hell-bent on ironing out the issues with Taliban through diplomacy. Now, as per the views of all of our political elite the only way to rule the people is democracy, most of them believe in “La Ikraha fid Din” or in other words they don’t believe in enforcement of Sharia in a harsh manner, and most of them also do not believe in forcing women to wear Burqa.

The situation seems to be on quite extreme on both the ends. Whatever the extremists believe to be absolutely right is totally left out by the politicians in their options. It is also a fact that a progressive Pakistan cannot be achieved without a peaceful Pakistan. However, a tough time is on its way for the politicians that will hold talks with the extremists.

One other option is that at least 30% of the demands of the extremists will have to be accepted in order to reach a compromise. Then we will have a strange Pakistan: A Pakistan where at least 30% women wandering on roads, in bazaars etc must wear burqa while the rest can have the liberty to wear whatever they want; a Pakistan where at least 30% of men have to grow beard to a required level; a Pakistan where at least 30% of the police force will have to be converted to “Amr e bil Maroof wa nahi anil Munkar” unit so that Sharia can be implemented with force, a Pakistan where at least 30% of culprits will get corporal punishments by using the electric cables, a Pakistan where at least 30% of the people will be ruled through Khilafa and the rest through democracy.

This is the apparent future of Pakistan; the state that was emancipated on the basis of “Two Nation Theory” will become a visible platform to a unique and innovative “Two Ruling System.”

And most importantly the last line of the agreement shall declare that “if at any point in time, the percentage of Khilafa followers is dropped below 30 per cent of the total population of Pakistan, the agreement will become null and void with immediate effect.”

Arbab Daud has worked as a research consultant in Afghanistan for 8 years. He is currently running a Research and Consulting firm by the name ‘Kaar Pohan’ in Peshawar

 

 

 

Solving the water problem
While there are many hurdles, there is no technical or economic reason as to why all Karachiites cannot have access to clean water 
By Professor Asit K. Biswas and Asif Mehmood

Karachi is in turmoil. But it’s the crisis of urban order that always hits the headlines and not its water woes.  While the water organisations continue to struggle and Karachiites suffer on the issue, any plausible solution is far from the sight.

One of the biggest challenges for the Karachi Water and Sewerage Board (KWSB) is its resource constraints. The total demand would jump to 1368 Million Gallon per Day (MGD) in 2020 (from the estimated 941 MGD in 2010). The existing shortage is estimated to be 430 MGD.

Every year 100 MGD is required to meet the deficit. According to United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA), Karachi’s population is projected to be 20.2 million in 2025. Sadly, KWSB cannot expand its services fast enough. Only 60 per cent of Karachiites are connected with the existing supply which is irregular and inequitable — 4 hours per day.

Over 50 per cent of the city population lives in slums. KWSB does not provide water to the slum residents maintaining they would claim land ownership rights on the basis of water connections.

There are also major governance issues. The water tariffs are far too low to support operations of KWSB or promote water conservation.

Moreover, effective collection of tariffs has also been overlooked in the past. Only 60 per cent of the total billing comes back with payments. Ever rising cost of production/treatment of water, theft amounting to be 30 per cent MGD per day and corruption are serious challenges faced by the KWSB.

Ironically, the biggest defaulters are governmental agencies — Federal and Provincial governments have to pay arrears to the tune of Rs 2961.19 million. The line losses are at least 35 per cent of the existing facility due to forty years old dilapidated water transmission lines.

The most important is the quality of water being consumed in the city. Pakistan Medical Association (PMA) recently conducted a study on drinking water and out of 600 samples collected from different areas of the city, not a single was fit for human consumption. This is in spite of the fact that National Drinking Water Policy 2009 recognises access to clean drinking water as a citizens’ fundamental right and it is the state’s responsibility to fulfil this policy goal.

Two areas are critical for the future water policy reforms:

The Water Board has to address its management challenges i.e. revising tariffs to sustain its operations, focusing on non-revenue water and tackling corruption. The fundamental argument is that even a resource rich organisation cannot deliver if it is poorly managed. Even if the Rs 25.5 billion project K-IV that seeks more 650 MGD from the Indus River for the city is completed, the growing population and worn out infrastructure will always create problems for the supply side.

Stressing the quality of water is fighting the case of 60 per cent of Karachiites that are connected with the urban water utility. Expansion of the existing facilities would never be enough if the existing service continues to be substandard.

Though there can be more than one policy objective. KWSB has to see that the water subsidy is targeted only to the poor. Rich and middle class families must pay for the water they consume.

Global experience shows that flawed tariff and subsidy designs lead to poor service delivery and thus become economiclly unsustainable

For water losses, Karachi can learn from the best practices around the world. For example, Jamshedpur (India) has reduced its losses from 36 per cent to 10 per cent in the span of four years (2005-09), Phnom Penh (Cambodia) remarkably decreased 72 per cent to 6 per cent from 1993 to 2008, and East Manila did the same miraculous task from 63 per cent to 16 per cent in less than a decade.

If Phnom Penh could do it, so could Karachi, especially as Pakistan has significantly better management and technical expertise compared to Cambodia.

While KWSB has to struggle hard to come out of its mismanaged past and fight for more autonomy in decision making, sustainability and improved services, citizens will have to forge alliances to ensure their fundamental right of having easy access to clean drinking water.

Citizens may file petitions with the Ombudsman or the superior courts stressing on clear timelines for policy overhauls. There is absolutely no technical or economic reason as to why all Karachiites cannot have access to clean water -24 hours each day. All it will need is to improve substantially, the management practices of KWSB and reduce political interference and corruption.

Professor Asit K. Biswas is          Distinguished Visiting Professor Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, Singapore, and founder, Third World Centre for Water Management.

Asif Mehmood is gradute student of public policy at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, Singapore

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Free education under 25-A
PML-Q wants to build on the success of Parha Likha Punjab and take it further
By Shahzada Irfan Ahmed

With elections round the corner, it’s a pleasant surprise to see parties stressing a lot on importance of education in their manifestos and campaign material.

Pakistan Muslim League-Q is one such party which claims it gives education sector number one priority in its manifesto and terms it “central to building a modern developed society.” The party showcases the “Parha Likha Punjab” project executed by former Punjab chief minister Pervaiz Ilahi as a role model and intends to replicate it all over the country.

Even the election slogans are based on this theme and an advertisement reads like this: “If you want free education, free books, and scholarships to continue, vote for the PML-Q and stamp bicycle.” Though the party lost its stalwart Sheikh Waqas Akram, a former federal minister of education, to PML-N recently, it is confident it has enough fertile minds to come to its rescue and believes this exodus would not cause much harm to the party.

The promises the party has made in its manifesto include provision of free and universal primary education in the country, improvement and upgradation of the existing educational institutions, training of teachers and expansion of their expertise besides increasing their salaries and enhancing their social status.

The party also feels the sector of madrassa education is highly neglected in the country and therefore it finds it necessary to provide all facilities and financial support for modernization of madrassas, and more importantly the curriculum taught there. It foresees that once taught modern curriculum, the madrassa students will be able to benefit both from religious education as well as the education of mainstream education system.

Mian Imran Masood, ex-education minister, Punjab claims it was the PML-Q which introduced reforms in the education sector and made education free for students from class 1 to matriculation level. The party under the leadership of former Punjab Chief Minister Pervaiz Elahi introduced an incentive based system which offered scholarships and stipends to bright students, he adds.

The incentives policy offered to high performing students by the outgoing government in Punjab province is an adaptation of what the PML-Q introduced, he claims.

Imran tells TNS his party believes in meeting the genuine demands of the indigenous education sector rather than imposing solutions from above. “We would enroll the out of school children and ensure they get free education. Initially our target is to provide free education till matriculation level and after that we will take it up to graduation level,” he adds. He agrees there is a quality issue with education imparted in government schools and states their education policy brief talks a lot about investing in teachers.

Imran says the PML-Q government raised the salary package of teachers considerably and once it comes to power it will further enhance it. The other targets they have in mind are establishing more and more professional colleges all over the country, especially in the areas neglected in the past.

The party’s inspiration to ensure free education to students, it claims, comes from the Article 25-A of the Constitution, which emphasizes on providing free and compulsory education to children from 5 to 16 years of age. Its education policy has been drafted after thorough consultations and incorporating inputs from various quarters.

For example, a policy working group formed by the PML-Q leadership worked on party policies on youth empowerment, education, justice and economy etc.

Imran vows his party will strictly monitor the private and government sector colleges and universities and ensure they do not issue fake degrees. It will earmark additional resources to increase enrolment of girls in school and increase education budget by 30 to 35 per cent immediately. “We will not make any drastic changes like changing the medium of instruction as others are suggesting. It were we who introduced English as a subject in class 1 of government schools, and we will stick to this decision.”

Senator Kamil Ali Agha, PML-Q Secretary Information, says their education policy revolves around increasing involvement and bringing those children into school whose parents cannot afford to give them education.

This not a political statement, he says adding the PML-Q brought six million students to schools when it was in power. These children were out of school despite being of school-going age.

Kamil vows their party will strive to improve the conditions of thousands of school in the country which are in a dilapidated condition. There are no teachers in many schools, students sit under the sun, there are no benches to sit on, latrines are not functional and building structures are weak. “Before going for new structures, we will take care of those we already have.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Islands of prospects
The plan of constructing modern islands off the coast of Karachi 
has its pros and cons
By Naseer Memon

According to newspaper reports, real estate tycoon Malik Riaz’s Bahria Town and a US investment group signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) for $15 to 20 billion investment on March 11.

Under the project, Bahria Town, in collaboration with foreign companies associated with prominent US investor Thomas Kramer, would construct the world’s tallest building and a number of other projects some 3.5 kilometres off the Karachi shore.

A spokesman for Bahria Town said the project, the Bodha Island City, would be developed within a period of five to ten years, and that it would comprise Net City, Education City, Health City, Port City and other infrastructure projects. The world’s most modern shopping mall would also be built on the Island City.

According to reports, the Island City would be linked with Karachi through a six-lane bridge.

Malik Riaz also approached the Sindh government for issuance of no objection certificate to commence construction work on two islands, namely Bundal and Buddo (locally called Bundaar and Dingi respectively), located near the Karachi coast.

The Sindh government was under severe pressure of a highly influential personality to issue the NOC or stay silent. Port Qasim Authority (PQA), a self-proclaimed proprietor of the islands, has apparently sold these islands for the construction project of Bahria Town.

This is not the first time these islands have been put on sale. Last time, it was in 2006 when former Chief Minister Sindh, Dr Arbab Rahim, attempted to sell these islands to , a Dubai-based real estate company. Emaar promised to invest $43 billion. Emaar had 85 per cent equity in the project, to build a model city in 13 years. PQA held 15 per cent stakes and was supposed to provide land for the project.

The sordid deal was kept so clandestine that initially the Chief Minister of Sindh himself stated that the federal government had not taken the Sindh government in confidence on such a decision, and that his government would take up the matter with the federal government. However, the Sindh government capitulated subsequently. Civil society and environmental groups opposed the shadowy project. The scheme was later aborted without any public information.

The afore-mentioned islands are actually two ends of one long island — locally named as Dingi on the west and Bundaar on the east.

According to the “Compendum Report of High Priority Areas – Pakistan Component” developed by International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the island is actually part of Bundal/Khipranwala/Muchaka Islands Complex, which is included in High Priority Areas of Pakistan by IUCN.

The island complex, spread over an area of 17,850 hectares is located at the western end of the Sindh Coastal Zone bordered by Korangi, Phitti and Jhari creeks.

Bundal Island is one of the biggest and highest of all the islands along the Sindh coast, with a length of about 8km. The width of the island varies — it is about 4km wide in the north and 1km in the south. There are shifting sand dunes on the island, some of which gain heights of up to 3m. A portion of the northern area of the island is covered at high water and has a thick growth of mangroves at the extreme northern point. The eastern coast, covered with sand dunes, is steep and easily approachable by boat.

In the south of the island, the shallow patch of drying sand has developed into a new island namely Buddo (Dingi) Island, which is the outermost island of this series.

Ownership of the islands

Ownership of the islands has remained disputed as the Sindh government claimed the area was not leased to the PQA. Even the area leased to the PQA for port related-operations does not include the islands. However, the former Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz during his visit to Karachi on October 14, 2006 decreed that the land belongs to PQA.

City District Government of Karachi (CDGK) also had claim over the islands. According to a newspaper report of October 8, 2002, the CDGK and four entrepreneurs, including a firm from Thailand, signed a memorandum of understanding for establishing an IT infrastructural project. The Karachi Technology Island City proposed to be set up on a 300-acre piece of land, opposite the creek of Karachi, and was seen as a key technological infrastructure to help institutionalise and internationalise Karachi’s IT industry with the help of international donor agencies and investors.

PQA has been a major player in the race. PQA also considered the Bundal Island as one of the potential sites for setting up a terminal for Liquid Natural Gas (LNG). A consortium of leading Japanese and Korean companies expressed interest in setting up a LNG terminal at Bundal Island in response to an Expression of Interest (EOI) issued by PQA. The EOI sparked strong reaction from the Sindh government and the ownership of the area was challenged.

The Port Qasim Authority also allotted 2,700 acres of land to Pakistan Navy, without any authorisation. Although Pakistan Navy later shifted the facility to Ormara for which the land was acquired yet it maintained its claim over that land.

The Sindh government continued to claim the ownership of the islands. In a meeting held at Governor House, Sindh on February 23, 2006, a senior member of the Board of Revenue said that the island was a property of the government of Sindh. According to him, when PQA was established, its area of operation was defined, which does not include the Bundal Island.

The provincial law department had also been of the view that the land allotted by the federal government was the property of the provincial government. Sindh High Court had also given a judgment in favour of the provincial government in a dispute with Defence Housing Authority about the latter’s claim to 250 acres of reclaimed land near the Clifton beach.

The Constitution of Pakistan also supports the point of view of the Sindh Government: Article 172 (1) of the Constitution states, “Any property which has no rightful owner shall, if located in a province, vest in the Government of that Province and in every other case, in the Federal Government”.

Ecological significance of the islands

Recognising immense ecological significance of the islands IUCN included them in the list of High Priority Areas. According to the “Compendium Report of High Priority Areas – Pakistan Component” developed by IUCN, total area under mangrove cover on these islands is 10,000 ha, which represents the habitat for juvenile fish and shrimp in the area.

Bundal Island is the breeding ground of the Green Turtles. The sandy beaches of these islands are the only areas where the endangered Green Turtles visit the east coast of Karachi for breeding purposes. The ancient Ratoo Kot Fort on Muchaka Island (located closer to the two islands) can form a tourist attraction. It is part of the ancient history of Sindh and if rehabilitated could serve as an interesting historical landmark and attractive place for tourists.

Local fishing community also is also dependent on these islands for livelihood. Out of the population of 25,000 of the coastal villages, 80 per cent fish in these waters. The surrounding waters serve as feeding grounds for two varieties of dolphins (humpback and bottlenose).

The area lies along the Indus Flyway and as such serves as an important breeding and feeding ground for migratory and resident bird species.

Protection of this treasure of nature is also an obligation by virtue of “Convention on Biological Diversity” (CBD). Pakistan is among the 189 signatories of the convention and the government has also prepared an action plan to implement the convention.

Any development scheme which deprives marginalised people of their livelihood resources cannot be called sustainable development. The two islands with mangrove eco-system provide rich fishing grounds for subsistence fishing in surrounding waters. A large population of Ibrahim Hyderi and other small villages of fishermen find their livelihood through shallow water fishing around these islands.

Their earlier fishing grounds became inaccessible due to the “development” of DHA and various boat clubs. Now with this development hundreds of fishermen families are bound to lose the nearest source of their livelihood. About 4,000 to 5,000 fishing boats sail in the open sea through Korangi and Phitti Creeks, located on both ends of the twin islands. There mobility can be restricted in the wake of development on the islands.

It is worth mentioning here that when these islands were being sold during the Musharraf’s era, the then Chief Minister Syed Qaim Ali Shah, General Secretary of PPP Sindh Mr. Taj Hyder vehemently opposed the deal and termed it a conspiracy of federal government against land of Sindh government.

The writer is Chief Executive of Strengthening Participatory Organization-SPO, nmemon@spopk.org

  Home|Daily Jang|The News|Sales & Advt|Contact Us|

 


BACK ISSUES