|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
tribute politics Can
private sector mitigate conflicts? talks Solving
the water problem Free
education under 25-A Islands of
prospects
Revolutionary resolve Perween Rahman had a capacity to pick up on the potential of people, and believe in them until they had no choice but to believe in themselves By Rabia Ezdi It is a natural
human instinct to celebrate those that leave us. But a tribute to Perween
Rahman is like sharing some of the stuff that real legends are made of.
Not the people of big awards and media coverage, but those that make
change on the ground while shunning publicity; the true heroes of
Pakistan. I first met Perween
eleven years ago. After being disillusioned by the role of mainstream
architects in making the kind of change that was needed in our cities, I
had decided to plunge into the NGO sector. The replication of the OPP (Orangi
Pilot Project) model in Punjab had begun, adding to its recognition as a
development alternative with much promise. I expected Perween to be the
proverbial ‘NGO-type’: scary, aggressive, intimidating. She was none
of these. With a warm smile, a chirpy voice, and a kind demeanour, she
welcomed me to the OPP-RTI (Orangi Pilot Project-Research and Training
Institute) and told me that I should spend the first two weeks just trying
to understand the work of the organisation. OPP was at the time and
still is, running on the momentum of Dr Akhtar Hamid Khan’s teachings;
simplicity, frugality, and the ideals of love and humanity. Two of the
first of Dr Sahib’s axioms I was told I must remember were: “I made a
mistake”, and “I have not understood”. Being used to an academic and
professional world where flaunting one’s knowledge, talking more than
listening, and proving one’s point often in heavy jargon, were
characteristic of ‘strong’ professionals — this new ethos was most
liberating, and one of the things that made me fall instantly for the
OPP’s development philosophy. Anyone interested in
being a part of this most beautiful process of true, rooted change, could
just sit back, listen, observe, and internalise when ready. There was no
room for ego. Also, where mainstream development work is about ‘doing’
for the poor, this was about learning from the poor, and supporting their
initiatives with whatever know-how is appropriate, from technical input,
to maps and training. It was the self-help model, committed to bringing
human dignity back into the formula of helping the poor help themselves. It was this that I
learnt most from Perween and those at OPP: working for ‘real’
development is, more than anything else, a spiritual discipline. On the operational side
of the organisation, there was the weekly Monday meeting. In appearance
just a tedious reporting of the week’s progress by every OPP-RTI team
member including Perween herself, in reality it is an exceptional tool for
accountability, transparency, and inclusive decision-making. It was the
platform for debate, disagreement, acknowledgement of failures, and a
celebration of small and big successes. In work ethic, Perween
was a disciplinarian and this had trickled down to all members of the
institution. Work was the temple, the worship; there was no compromise.
While she was gentle, she was as firm and upright as the trunk of an oak
tree. The OPP-RTI research objective was clear: advocacy for the poor. The
methodology was simple — interview, mapping, writing, and dissemination.
And then there was
Perween’s insistence on using the right words; “It is the terms we use
that shape our biases towards the poor,” she would say. Perween was not
opposed to the city’s ‘mafias’ any more than she was saddened by the
government’s indifference in solving the problems of the poor. She had
come to realise that the term ‘mafia’ is misleading; in a system that
is not fair by its very nature, and where the majority has no choice but
to fend for themselves, a ‘mafia’ was simply an opportunist’s
response in a crisis. The word ‘katchi abadi’
she would say, leads to an automatic anti-poor prejudice. It was merely
‘People’s Housing’, “They are people who have found no alternative
and this reflects the failure of the government to
absorb them”. And ‘informal settlements’? Perween had
concluded that there is no such thing; it was simply that which was
‘unofficial’ planning, unofficially supplied services, and unofficial
systems, versus what was ‘officially’ done and recognised. And it was
these ‘unofficial’ systems that existed often in collusion with the
government, and supported the lives of 70 per cent of the city’s
population, hence the need to recognise and understand them. Perween was high on
life. Along with countless people from community-based organisations in
Sindh and Punjab, we travelled across the country several times a year,
trying to understand and support poor people’s initiatives. Travel was
not just business; while the tone was always jovial, it was above all an
opportunity to make connections and give people hope. It is this
people-building that was the real and lasting investment. Perween had a
capacity to pick up on the potential of people, and believe in them until
they had no choice but to believe in themselves. She would instil
idealism, humane values, and a work ethic without overtly ‘preaching’.
She was that rare combination of mentor and friend. Perween was not the
change itself, she was one of change’s most potent agents — the faith
of change, the brain behind change. In her inside-out understanding of the
city’s ways, and in the networks and relationships with government and
communities that she had forged over the years, Perween had crystallised a
movement of sorts, where the marginalised were shown ways in which they
would really no longer be the city’s ‘Citizen X’. And it is always
the true change-makers of the world that shake the hold of those who live
only to maintain a ruthless status quo. Many theories abound
about who would want to so heinously rob this gentle soul of her life,
this soul that couldn’t hurt an ant. The truth is simply that in the
years since she first joined OPP, Perween had quietly grown and come to a
point where she could move mountains. The OPP’s ground-breaking low-cost
sanitation model, and the upgrading of housing in Orangi, were the
primers. The Karachi master plan for the conversion of Karachi’s open
nallahs into box culverts was achieved through an arduous process of
lobbying with the KWSB. Research into the truth about Karachi’s water
crisis, and unearthing water ‘thefts’ was geared by the OPP. The 2006 floods in
Karachi and their connection with the choking of Karachi’s storm-water
nallahs due to encroachments by government and private interests alike,
was investigated by the OPP. And now the Secure Housing Initiative,
wherein it was discovered that pre-partition villages or Goths in
Karachi’s peripheral areas, were being evicted by political interests in
order to create new constituencies for political parties. Where the
government’s figures recognised these goths to be 400 in number, through
research the OPP-RTI discovered that there were more than 2000. The
OPP-RTI had entered into a process of mapping these goths, and supporting
goth dwellers to advocate for land title. In 2010, these maps
helped convince the government to issue land titles to over half of those
communities. Now, by 2013, more land titles were on their way. “The maps
did it. Maps help to build relationships,” she would say, “The maps
tell us what to do, where to go, who to lobby. They help professionals to
understand the reality and have the courage to accept it. They help
government to understand the reality and accept it too, because they are
no longer the only ones that have that information. The people have this
information now, and the NGOs and media have it too.” Most of these maps
of the goth settlements have now been accepted as official government
maps. “It is the community youth who actually do the mapping. We only
help train them, and then take a back seat, become invisible.” Despite negativity and
despair all around, with the youthful spirit of a sixteen-year-old,
Perween never stopped being an incurable optimist. In a presentation she
made in Bangkok in February at a meeting of community-based organisations
from Asia, Perween’s words are the only solace one finds in the midst of
this painful turn of events: “Today Karachi is in flames, and one of the
aspects of the violence in the city is the politics of land and who gets
title to it. Getting land title for these goth settlers, who have lived
there since long before partition in 1947, has been a very powerful step
forward for the peace and the political balance of Karachi. We were just
saying amongst ourselves that if we die today, we will die so happily,
because we have done it.” This was Perween Rahman.
With the childlike vivacity of a fluttering bird, the resolve of a
revolutionary, and the magnanimity of a sage, this gentle soul had helped
to change the map of Karachi.
politics It has become a
tradition with most of the holders of top public slots in Pakistan to
visit foreign lands to pay homage, in person, to saints buried there. For
instance, on March 9, 2013, our Gujar Khan-born and Sangarh-bred prime
minister went to India, on a private visit, to pay homage to Sufi saint
Hazrat Moinuddin Chishti, whose shrine is located in Ajmer Sharif. The
saint is popularly called Khwaja Gharib Nawaz and his 13th century
mausoleum is 130 km from Jaipur, capital of the northern India desert
state of Rajasthan. Pakistan’s first woman
prime minister, Benazir Bhutto, would also visit shrines or call on
various Pirs for their blessings. She reportedly called on Pir Dhanka in
Hazara, who patted her with his traditional stick to administer the
blessings. The helmsman of one of the two mainstream political parties, it
is said, sets his daily routine in consultation with a revered
personality, who reportedly advised him, some time back, to remain away
from the mountainous arid lands and the top man remained put near the
coastal and sandy terrains throughout the period indicated by his peer.
Former prime minister Junejo held Pir Pagara in high esteem. He would walk
bare boot while going for audience with his mentor and would not turn his
back towards the Pir while tracing his steps back. Prime Minister Raja
Pervaiz Ashraf and his entourage of 28 persons, mostly his relatives or
servants, spent half an hour at Hazrat Moinuddin Chishti’s shrine, a
popular place of pilgrimage by the Muslims from all over the South Asia
Subcontinent. We hope that the expenses on this private visit would be
borne by the prime minister himself and not by the state of Pakistan,
which is already heavily indebted due to constant plundering and wastage
of public money. He would do well to emulate the noble examples set by
some of his predecessors of pre-1958 era, like Chaudhry Muhammad Ali, who
had resigned as prime minister of his own free will and without any
external pressure. In Shahab Nama (pages
694-695),.Qudratullah Shahab writes: At one point, after stepping down it
became imperative for Chaudhry Muhammad Ali to travel abroad for medical
treatment. But, he lacked the required sources. President Iskander Mirza
visited Chaudhry Muhammad Ali to convince him to accept treatment abroad
on government expense. The ailing former prime minister thanked the
president and said; “I have been receiving full compensation in return
of whatever services I have been performing for Pakistan. I do not want to
be a burden on the public exchequer.” On the president’s insistence,
Chaudhry Muhammad Ali agreed to take a loan of Rs20,000, which he returned
in a few installments later on. However, we presume that
there must be some compelling reason for the prime minister to leave the
country for this pilgrimage at a crucial time when his presence was most
wanted in the country. Perhaps, it was an exercise in ‘peace
diplomacy!’ We can deduce this conclusion from the impressions that the
prime minister recorded, in Urdu, in the visitors’ book kept at the
shrine of Khawaja Gharib Nawaz. He wrote: “I wish for peace in the world
and for peace and prosperity in Pakistan.” The third most sacred
temple of the Hindus is located at Raj Katas in Chakwal, but so far no
holder of top public slot in India has ever visited that place. The only
exception was Sindh-born Advani, who came over for pilgrimage to the place
when he was no longer the deputy prime minister of his country. In other
words, Advani visited Raj Katas purely as a private citizen. That remains
the case with the Hindu politicians of our neighbouring country. India’s
incumbent prime minister, Dr Manmohan Singh had a burning desire to visit
his birthplace in Chakwal, but he did not like to come to Pakistan unless
tangible results could be achieved during his visit. But, carefree
Pakistani leaders are carried away by passions, and think little about
results or outcome of their visits, whether public or private. According to the
teachings of Islam, one can offer Fateha for the departed souls from any
corner of the globe and a visit in person to the shrines/graves of the
deceased is not mandatory. In the past, the abodes of saints were centres
of learning and the people would visit them, from far and wide, for
acquiring knowledge about the teachings of Islam and/or to seek guidance
from the scholarly/saintly figures about prudently managing worldly
affairs. Abbaside Caliph Haroon-ur-Rashid paid a visit to an eminent Sufi
saint of his time, Shaqiq Bulkhi, to seek guidance for better governance. On arrival, Bulkhi
entertained the emperor with a glass of water. Later, he enquired from the
monarch that if he happened to be all alone in a far away desert where
there was no trace of water within miles, and he felt acute thirst and
believed that it could prove fatal, what would he do? The Caliph replied:
He would give one-half of his empire for a glass of water. Later, the Sufi
asked the emperor that if he could not urinate and on that count felt
unbearable pain which could result in his death, what would he do in such
a situation? Haroon-ur-Rashid said that he would give one-half of his
state to anyone who could relieve him from the agony. Bulkhi said: This
shows that the intrinsic or real worth of your entire kingdom was not more
than a glass of water. Therefore, you should never feel proud on that
count. Bulkhi said: “Allah
has given you (Haroon-ur-Rashid) the mantle of Hazrat Abu Bakar Siddique
and He wants you to rule with justice. God has given you the power bastion
which was once held by Hazrat Omar, and He wants you to distinguish
between the right and the wrong. The Almighty has bequeathed to you Hazrat
Osman’s lofty position and He wants you to be benevolent. The Creator
has entrusted to you the top-most mantle, which was once held by Hazrat
Ali, and He wants you to be the embodiment of knowledge, and to rule with
justice.” Continuing, Bulkhi said:
“A ruler was like a spring of water and the state officials like
channels sprouting from that spring. If the spring — the source of the
water — becomes polluted how could there be pure and sweet water in the
canals flowing out of it?” According to a legend,
Mughal emperor Shah Jehan, along with his sons, paid a call on a revered
saint of his times, Mian Mir, to seek the saint’s advice about division
of his vast empire among the four princes. During the meeting, the saint
made four equal pieces of bread (Roti) and gave one piece each to the
princes. But, the three princes — Dara Shakuh, Shuja and Murad —
handed on their share of bread to Aurangzeb, who ate all the four pieces
amidst taunts of his brothers. When Emperor Shah Jehan reminded the saint
about the purpose of his visit, the saint replied that he had divided the
empire equally among all the four princes, but the three of them handed
over their share to Aurangzeb, who is destined to succeed the Delhi
throne. We wish our rulers to
approach their Pirs with the request to bless them to rule with vision,
sagacity and honesty and not merely bless them with continuing to
occupying their coveted positions only. Alauddin Masood is a
freelance columnist based in Islamabad. E-mail:alauddinmasood@gmail.com
The phrase
‘from Karachi to Khyber’ appears to have taken a different
connotation. While the phrase was earlier used to describe the richness of
the land of sacred souls, it now reflects the breadth of bloodbath across
the country. Are we really heading backwards to an age of barbarianism?
There could be several explanations to the question of why the country
seems to be in a perennial state of conflicts. However, the answers to the
question may not be that difficult after all. A study conducted by the
Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) sought to answer this
question, focusing specifically on the role of the private sector in
mitigating conflicts in the country. With a rich household-level survey
across Pakistan, the study sheds light on community perceptions about the
role of businesses with regards to mitigating peace. Significantly, large
percentages of respondents think that lack of social services and lack of
employment opportunities are issues contributing to conflicts in the
country. A large percentage of respondents (48 per cent) think that lack
of basic necessities such as water and other utilities are also
contributing to conflicts. The study shows that lack of social services,
unemployment, and high cost of living are some of the most cited issues
confronting the Pakistani society (note that two these issues are also the
most cited ones as contributing to conflicts in the country, as mentioned
before). Even though most
respondents (over 93 per cent) think that business expansion is beneficial
for communities, a high percentage agrees to the idea of businesses’
involvement in local area development. Again, lack of employment, lack of
energy and other utilities, and lack of social services are considered by
most respondents as issues where private sector can help. An interesting finding
from the study is the response to ‘factors preventing business
engagement in peace-building’. Responses widely varied, covering issues
such as lack of legislation, corruption, political resistance and risks to
business, among others. It is important to note, however, that even though
these issues may prevent proactive peace measures on part of businesses,
partnerships with influential rent-seeking groups are also incompatible
with a peaceful environment in the longer run. So what are the lessons
to be learnt, and demands made, before we caste our votes later this year.
And what should be the lessons for those now shouting slogans to come into
power? Regardless of the structure of power, strategic peace in the
country demands participation from all stakeholders in the conflict
milieu. The study by SDPI identifies three broad sets of stakeholders, and
proposes recommendations along the following lines. Public Sector: Strong
business does not always entail a strong private sector. There could be a
leader in a certain market with flourishing business (since it enjoys a
large market share), while market barriers prevent entry of other
businesses. This implies a weak private sector despite strong businesses.
On the other hand, the influence of regulatory bodies to enforce
compliance even of existing laws appears to be very weak. A weak private sector in
the country coupled with a weak regulatory structure provides perfect
opportunity for a middle ground between two contesting schools of thought
that advocate for strengthening one against the other. While the private
sector needs to be strengthened by opening up markets and allowing a fair
and competitive business environment, it is equally important to
strengthen the regulatory structure that also ensures inclusive business
practices. These include ensuring local employment and strict compliance
to regulations, such as the Environmental Protection Act. Opening up markets may
incentivise formalisation of informal businesses and would also create
opportunities for small and medium enterprises to become active players in
the economy. Parallel development of markets and regulatory structure may
ultimately lead to peaceful as well as sustainable economies. Businesses: A more
strategic approach towards inclusive communities on part of large
businesses could be to include local small and medium enterprises (SMEs)
in their supply-chains. Doing so can also help formalize many operating
informally at the local level and fits well with the argument on
strengthening the private sector as mentioned above. Businesses also need to
take note of the failure of social service delivery wherever they operate.
A useful approach to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in that context
could be to institutionalize development programs within the business
model. For example, the Hashoo Group of Companies has established and
funds the Hashoo Foundation, an NGO actively working on various
development themes. The Hashoo Foundation is to a large extent
self-sustainable and not vulnerable to availability of funds from
international donors. Communities and the
Civil Society: The civil society networks provide an excellent platform
for organizing communities. Civil society organizations (CSO) not only
work on different thematic areas of development but also provide a channel
for community interface across a wide range of actors including government
and businesses. Communities at the local level may have to be more
acceptable of CSOs in so far as their inclusion in societal issues is
concerned. Community-led
organizations and associations, in turn, should work to make themselves
sustainable. For example, ExtraCorp, a project of the School of Leadership
Foundation (SOLF) in Karachi, provides vocational and managerial training
to people with disability. Their trainees work as a small enterprise
producing handicrafts. ExtraCorp now generates enough business on its own,
creating livelihoods for those with disabilities. Our private sector also
needs to innovate its role towards promotion of peace in the country. We
have examples from other conflict prone countries such as Sri Lanka, Nepal
and Philippines where private sector played a crucial role for a sustained
time period in bringing down the intensity of conflict through promotion
of CSR, employment and livelihood opportunities at the local level. It is
also time now that our Chambers of Commerce and Pakistan Business Council
look into such initiatives. The authors are
Economists at Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI)
Dandy diplomacy The situation seems to be extreme on both ends on the issue of talks with the taliban By Arbab Daud 9/11 was a
defining moment in the global history. The event not only changed
definitions of many issues but also evolved some new concepts for the
world. At that point of time, it was a unanimous decision by most of the
developed world that Islamic extremism is the root-cause of all the
worldly ills and that is why it should be wiped off the face of the earth
in order to make this planet livable. Most importantly, the actions
against the perpetrators was planned to be precise, well-coordinated and
swift. The initial practice of
smoking out and bombing the “newly-defined evil” seemed to be working
well and was supposed to last till the achievement of the goal. Out of
nowhere, someone or something intervened to stop bombing and the process
of rehabilitation and reconstruction started. The shift in strategy
enabled the extremists to re-group, chisel out their strategy and
retaliate ferociously. Their attacks dripped through at the outset,
streamed gradually and gushed at the close to push the aggressive force on
back foot. This resulted in a shift of perspective as well. The developed
world then tried to declare that there are good and bad amongst the evil
or in other words “lesser of the two evils.” Whether through a meager
happenstance or a well thought out design the global financial crises came
to the fore at the time when the world needed funds for its important war
on terror. The crises clipped the wings of many partners in the
“coalition of willing” and thus started another change in plan i.e.
pull out. At this point in time, the options of the western powers started
expanding and thus an idea was coined that diplomacy is also an option to
deal with only “good” extremists. Still the most suitable option
seemed gunboat diplomacy. Needless to mention,
that the developing world might fail in original thinking but always
succeed in imitating the masters. Now we can see many people who have
started running from pillar to post to bring the Taliban to a talking
table. Some offer themselves as guarantors while others offer their
services as negotiators. However, the genius acts in silence. To look into the issue
in greater detail, we first need to look at what actually the extremists
want? And to answer this question, a rocket-scientist is not needed. The
extremists want to implement a hard-core religious system based completely
on the principles of self-defined Sharia. The rule of law must be based on
religious framework and its implementation must be ensured through brute
force. As per our learning from
the rule of extremists in our neighbouring country in the past, we saw
that for all men growing of beard was an imperative. Women were required
not to come out of their homes alone and must be accompanied by a Mehram.
Women when going out of home must wear a Burqa or in other words they have
to hide themselves from head to toe. A special police unit
was formed by the name “Amr bil Maroof wa nahi anil Munkar” to enforce
the religious practices like five time prayers, dressing code, ethical
code of religion, length of beard etc. The force will capture the
non-follower on spot, hold a trial within seconds and do the execution
abruptly as well. The non-followers of the code were supposed to be
electrified, but in the absence of electricity, the cables were used to
inflict corporal punishments on the culprits. Most importantly, the
governance system selected by the extremists was Khilafa and not the
democratic way of government. Democracy was and still is regarded as a
load of hogwash propagated by the heathenish west and denounced
categorically. In short, the working
style of the extremists was predominantly converged on the saying
“it’s my way or highway.” However, after a show of force by the
western forces through fire-breathing flying metallic dragons nicknamed
drone predators, and spending a long time in caves and mountains the
extremists have agreed to come to a talking table for straightening out
the issues. On the other hand, our
leaders are hell-bent on ironing out the issues with Taliban through
diplomacy. Now, as per the views of all of our political elite the only
way to rule the people is democracy, most of them believe in “La Ikraha
fid Din” or in other words they don’t believe in enforcement of Sharia
in a harsh manner, and most of them also do not believe in forcing women
to wear Burqa. The situation seems to
be on quite extreme on both the ends. Whatever the extremists believe to
be absolutely right is totally left out by the politicians in their
options. It is also a fact that a progressive Pakistan cannot be achieved
without a peaceful Pakistan. However, a tough time is on its way for the
politicians that will hold talks with the extremists. One other option is that
at least 30% of the demands of the extremists will have to be accepted in
order to reach a compromise. Then we will have a strange Pakistan: A
Pakistan where at least 30% women wandering on roads, in bazaars etc must
wear burqa while the rest can have the liberty to wear whatever they want;
a Pakistan where at least 30% of men have to grow beard to a required
level; a Pakistan where at least 30% of the police force will have to be
converted to “Amr e bil Maroof wa nahi anil Munkar” unit so that
Sharia can be implemented with force, a Pakistan where at least 30% of
culprits will get corporal punishments by using the electric cables, a
Pakistan where at least 30% of the people will be ruled through Khilafa
and the rest through democracy. This is the apparent
future of Pakistan; the state that was emancipated on the basis of “Two
Nation Theory” will become a visible platform to a unique and innovative
“Two Ruling System.” And most importantly the
last line of the agreement shall declare that “if at any point in time,
the percentage of Khilafa followers is dropped below 30 per cent of the
total population of Pakistan, the agreement will become null and void with
immediate effect.” Arbab Daud has worked as
a research consultant in Afghanistan for 8 years. He is currently running
a Research and Consulting firm by the name ‘Kaar Pohan’ in Peshawar
Solving the water problem Karachi is in
turmoil. But it’s the crisis of urban order that always hits the
headlines and not its water woes. While
the water organisations continue to struggle and Karachiites suffer on the
issue, any plausible solution is far from the sight. One of the biggest
challenges for the Karachi Water and Sewerage Board (KWSB) is its resource
constraints. The total demand would jump to 1368 Million Gallon per Day (MGD)
in 2020 (from the estimated 941 MGD in 2010). The existing shortage is
estimated to be 430 MGD. Every year 100 MGD is
required to meet the deficit. According to United Nations Department of
Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA), Karachi’s population is projected
to be 20.2 million in 2025. Sadly, KWSB cannot expand its services fast
enough. Only 60 per cent of Karachiites are connected with the existing
supply which is irregular and inequitable — 4 hours per day. Over 50 per cent of the
city population lives in slums. KWSB does not provide water to the slum
residents maintaining they would claim land ownership rights on the basis
of water connections. There are also major
governance issues. The water tariffs are far too low to support operations
of KWSB or promote water conservation. Moreover, effective
collection of tariffs has also been overlooked in the past. Only 60 per
cent of the total billing comes back with payments. Ever rising cost of
production/treatment of water, theft amounting to be 30 per cent MGD per
day and corruption are serious challenges faced by the KWSB. Ironically, the biggest
defaulters are governmental agencies — Federal and Provincial
governments have to pay arrears to the tune of Rs 2961.19 million. The
line losses are at least 35 per cent of the existing facility due to forty
years old dilapidated water transmission lines. The most important is
the quality of water being consumed in the city. Pakistan Medical
Association (PMA) recently conducted a study on drinking water and out of
600 samples collected from different areas of the city, not a single was
fit for human consumption. This is in spite of the fact that National
Drinking Water Policy 2009 recognises access to clean drinking water as a
citizens’ fundamental right and it is the state’s responsibility to
fulfil this policy goal. Two areas are critical
for the future water policy reforms: The Water Board has to
address its management challenges i.e. revising tariffs to sustain its
operations, focusing on non-revenue water and tackling corruption. The
fundamental argument is that even a resource rich organisation cannot
deliver if it is poorly managed. Even if the Rs 25.5 billion project K-IV
that seeks more 650 MGD from the Indus River for the city is completed,
the growing population and worn out infrastructure will always create
problems for the supply side. Stressing the quality of
water is fighting the case of 60 per cent of Karachiites that are
connected with the urban water utility. Expansion of the existing
facilities would never be enough if the existing service continues to be
substandard. Though there can be more
than one policy objective. KWSB has to see that the water subsidy is
targeted only to the poor. Rich and middle class families must pay for the
water they consume. Global experience shows
that flawed tariff and subsidy designs lead to poor service delivery and
thus become economiclly unsustainable For water losses,
Karachi can learn from the best practices around the world. For example,
Jamshedpur (India) has reduced its losses from 36 per cent to 10 per cent
in the span of four years (2005-09), Phnom Penh (Cambodia) remarkably
decreased 72 per cent to 6 per cent from 1993 to 2008, and East Manila did
the same miraculous task from 63 per cent to 16 per cent in less than a
decade. If Phnom Penh could do
it, so could Karachi, especially as Pakistan has significantly better
management and technical expertise compared to Cambodia. While KWSB has to
struggle hard to come out of its mismanaged past and fight for more
autonomy in decision making, sustainability and improved services,
citizens will have to forge alliances to ensure their fundamental right of
having easy access to clean drinking water. Citizens may file
petitions with the Ombudsman or the superior courts stressing on clear
timelines for policy overhauls. There is absolutely no technical or
economic reason as to why all Karachiites cannot have access to clean
water -24 hours each day. All it will need is to improve substantially,
the management practices of KWSB and reduce political interference and
corruption. Professor Asit K. Biswas
is
Distinguished Visiting Professor Lee Kuan Yew School of Public
Policy, Singapore, and founder, Third World Centre for Water Management. Asif Mehmood is gradute
student of public policy at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy,
Singapore
PML-Q wants to build on the success of Parha Likha Punjab and take it further By Shahzada Irfan Ahmed With elections
round the corner, it’s a pleasant surprise to see parties stressing a
lot on importance of education in their manifestos and campaign material. Pakistan Muslim League-Q
is one such party which claims it gives education sector number one
priority in its manifesto and terms it “central to building a modern
developed society.” The party showcases the “Parha Likha Punjab”
project executed by former Punjab chief minister Pervaiz Ilahi as a role
model and intends to replicate it all over the country. Even the election
slogans are based on this theme and an advertisement reads like this:
“If you want free education, free books, and scholarships to continue,
vote for the PML-Q and stamp bicycle.” Though the party lost its
stalwart Sheikh Waqas Akram, a former federal minister of education, to
PML-N recently, it is confident it has enough fertile minds to come to its
rescue and believes this exodus would not cause much harm to the party. The promises the party
has made in its manifesto include provision of free and universal primary
education in the country, improvement and upgradation of the existing
educational institutions, training of teachers and expansion of their
expertise besides increasing their salaries and enhancing their social
status. The party also feels the
sector of madrassa education is highly neglected in the country and
therefore it finds it necessary to provide all facilities and financial
support for modernization of madrassas, and more importantly the
curriculum taught there. It foresees that once taught modern curriculum,
the madrassa students will be able to benefit both from religious
education as well as the education of mainstream education system. Mian Imran Masood,
ex-education minister, Punjab claims it was the PML-Q which introduced
reforms in the education sector and made education free for students from
class 1 to matriculation level. The party under the leadership of former
Punjab Chief Minister Pervaiz Elahi introduced an incentive based system
which offered scholarships and stipends to bright students, he adds. The incentives policy
offered to high performing students by the outgoing government in Punjab
province is an adaptation of what the PML-Q introduced, he claims. Imran tells TNS his
party believes in meeting the genuine demands of the indigenous education
sector rather than imposing solutions from above. “We would enroll the
out of school children and ensure they get free education. Initially our
target is to provide free education till matriculation level and after
that we will take it up to graduation level,” he adds. He agrees there
is a quality issue with education imparted in government schools and
states their education policy brief talks a lot about investing in
teachers. Imran says the PML-Q
government raised the salary package of teachers considerably and once it
comes to power it will further enhance it. The other targets they have in
mind are establishing more and more professional colleges all over the
country, especially in the areas neglected in the past. The party’s
inspiration to ensure free education to students, it claims, comes from
the Article 25-A of the Constitution, which emphasizes on providing free
and compulsory education to children from 5 to 16 years of age. Its
education policy has been drafted after thorough consultations and
incorporating inputs from various quarters. For example, a policy
working group formed by the PML-Q leadership worked on party policies on
youth empowerment, education, justice and economy etc. Imran vows his party
will strictly monitor the private and government sector colleges and
universities and ensure they do not issue fake degrees. It will earmark
additional resources to increase enrolment of girls in school and increase
education budget by 30 to 35 per cent immediately. “We will not make any
drastic changes like changing the medium of instruction as others are
suggesting. It were we who introduced English as a subject in class 1 of
government schools, and we will stick to this decision.” Senator Kamil Ali Agha,
PML-Q Secretary Information, says their education policy revolves around
increasing involvement and bringing those children into school whose
parents cannot afford to give them education. This not a political
statement, he says adding the PML-Q brought six million students to
schools when it was in power. These children were out of school despite
being of school-going age. Kamil vows their party
will strive to improve the conditions of thousands of school in the
country which are in a dilapidated condition. There are no teachers in
many schools, students sit under the sun, there are no benches to sit on,
latrines are not functional and building structures are weak. “Before
going for new structures, we will take care of those we already have.”
Islands
of prospects According to
newspaper reports, real estate tycoon Malik Riaz’s Bahria Town and a US
investment group signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) for $15 to 20
billion investment on March 11. Under the project,
Bahria Town, in collaboration with foreign companies associated with
prominent US investor Thomas Kramer, would construct the world’s tallest
building and a number of other projects some 3.5 kilometres off the
Karachi shore. A spokesman for Bahria
Town said the project, the Bodha Island City, would be developed within a
period of five to ten years, and that it would comprise Net City,
Education City, Health City, Port City and other infrastructure projects.
The world’s most modern shopping mall would also be built on the Island
City. According to reports,
the Island City would be linked with Karachi through a six-lane bridge. Malik Riaz also
approached the Sindh government for issuance of no objection certificate
to commence construction work on two islands, namely Bundal and Buddo
(locally called Bundaar and Dingi respectively), located near the Karachi
coast. The Sindh government was
under severe pressure of a highly influential personality to issue the NOC
or stay silent. Port Qasim Authority (PQA), a self-proclaimed proprietor
of the islands, has apparently sold these islands for the construction
project of Bahria Town. This is not the first
time these islands have been put on sale. Last time, it was in 2006 when
former Chief Minister Sindh, Dr Arbab Rahim, attempted to sell these
islands to , a Dubai-based real estate company. Emaar promised to invest
$43 billion. Emaar had 85 per cent equity in the project, to build a model
city in 13 years. PQA held 15 per cent stakes and was supposed to provide
land for the project. The sordid deal was kept
so clandestine that initially the Chief Minister of Sindh himself stated
that the federal government had not taken the Sindh government in
confidence on such a decision, and that his government would take up the
matter with the federal government. However, the Sindh government
capitulated subsequently. Civil society and environmental groups opposed
the shadowy project. The scheme was later aborted without any public
information. The afore-mentioned
islands are actually two ends of one long island — locally named as
Dingi on the west and Bundaar on the east. According to the
“Compendum Report of High Priority Areas – Pakistan Component”
developed by International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the
island is actually part of Bundal/Khipranwala/Muchaka Islands Complex,
which is included in High Priority Areas of Pakistan by IUCN. The island complex,
spread over an area of 17,850 hectares is located at the western end of
the Sindh Coastal Zone bordered by Korangi, Phitti and Jhari creeks. Bundal Island is one of
the biggest and highest of all the islands along the Sindh coast, with a
length of about 8km. The width of the island varies — it is about 4km
wide in the north and 1km in the south. There are shifting sand dunes on
the island, some of which gain heights of up to 3m. A portion of the
northern area of the island is covered at high water and has a thick
growth of mangroves at the extreme northern point. The eastern coast,
covered with sand dunes, is steep and easily approachable by boat. In the south of the
island, the shallow patch of drying sand has developed into a new island
namely Buddo (Dingi) Island, which is the outermost island of this series.
Ownership of the islands Ownership of the islands
has remained disputed as the Sindh government claimed the area was not
leased to the PQA. Even the area leased to the PQA for port
related-operations does not include the islands. However, the former Prime
Minister Shaukat Aziz during his visit to Karachi on October 14, 2006
decreed that the land belongs to PQA. City District Government
of Karachi (CDGK) also had claim over the islands. According to a
newspaper report of October 8, 2002, the CDGK and four entrepreneurs,
including a firm from Thailand, signed a memorandum of understanding for
establishing an IT infrastructural project. The Karachi Technology Island
City proposed to be set up on a 300-acre piece of land, opposite the creek
of Karachi, and was seen as a key technological infrastructure to help
institutionalise and internationalise Karachi’s IT industry with the
help of international donor agencies and investors. PQA has been a major
player in the race. PQA also considered the Bundal Island as one of the
potential sites for setting up a terminal for Liquid Natural Gas (LNG). A
consortium of leading Japanese and Korean companies expressed interest in
setting up a LNG terminal at Bundal Island in response to an Expression of
Interest (EOI) issued by PQA. The EOI sparked strong reaction from the
Sindh government and the ownership of the area was challenged. The Port Qasim Authority
also allotted 2,700 acres of land to Pakistan Navy, without any
authorisation. Although Pakistan Navy later shifted the facility to Ormara
for which the land was acquired yet it maintained its claim over that
land. The Sindh government
continued to claim the ownership of the islands. In a meeting held at
Governor House, Sindh on February 23, 2006, a senior member of the Board
of Revenue said that the island was a property of the government of Sindh.
According to him, when PQA was established, its area of operation was
defined, which does not include the Bundal Island. The provincial law
department had also been of the view that the land allotted by the federal
government was the property of the provincial government. Sindh High Court
had also given a judgment in favour of the provincial government in a
dispute with Defence Housing Authority about the latter’s claim to 250
acres of reclaimed land near the Clifton beach. The Constitution of
Pakistan also supports the point of view of the Sindh Government: Article
172 (1) of the Constitution states, “Any property which has no rightful
owner shall, if located in a province, vest in the Government of that
Province and in every other case, in the Federal Government”. Ecological significance
of the islands Recognising immense
ecological significance of the islands IUCN included them in the list of
High Priority Areas. According to the “Compendium Report of High
Priority Areas – Pakistan Component” developed by IUCN, total area
under mangrove cover on these islands is 10,000 ha, which represents the
habitat for juvenile fish and shrimp in the area. Bundal Island is the
breeding ground of the Green Turtles. The sandy beaches of these islands
are the only areas where the endangered Green Turtles visit the east coast
of Karachi for breeding purposes. The ancient Ratoo Kot Fort on Muchaka
Island (located closer to the two islands) can form a tourist attraction.
It is part of the ancient history of Sindh and if rehabilitated could
serve as an interesting historical landmark and attractive place for
tourists. Local fishing community
also is also dependent on these islands for livelihood. Out of the
population of 25,000 of the coastal villages, 80 per cent fish in these
waters. The surrounding waters serve as feeding grounds for two varieties
of dolphins (humpback and bottlenose). The area lies along the
Indus Flyway and as such serves as an important breeding and feeding
ground for migratory and resident bird species. Protection of this
treasure of nature is also an obligation by virtue of “Convention on
Biological Diversity” (CBD). Pakistan is among the 189 signatories of
the convention and the government has also prepared an action plan to
implement the convention. Any development scheme
which deprives marginalised people of their livelihood resources cannot be
called sustainable development. The two islands with mangrove eco-system
provide rich fishing grounds for subsistence fishing in surrounding
waters. A large population of Ibrahim Hyderi and other small villages of
fishermen find their livelihood through shallow water fishing around these
islands. Their earlier fishing
grounds became inaccessible due to the “development” of DHA and
various boat clubs. Now with this development hundreds of fishermen
families are bound to lose the nearest source of their livelihood. About
4,000 to 5,000 fishing boats sail in the open sea through Korangi and
Phitti Creeks, located on both ends of the twin islands. There mobility
can be restricted in the wake of development on the islands. It is worth mentioning
here that when these islands were being sold during the Musharraf’s era,
the then Chief Minister Syed Qaim Ali Shah, General Secretary of PPP Sindh
Mr. Taj Hyder vehemently opposed the deal and termed it a conspiracy of
federal government against land of Sindh government. The writer is Chief
Executive of Strengthening Participatory Organization-SPO, nmemon@spopk.org |
|